WE HAVE TO TAKE OUT THE MEXICAN CARTELS

President Biden says “White supremacists are the most lethal threat to America.” Are white supremacists killing, on average, 302 young American every day?  Why won’t our president talk about the threat from Mexican narco-terrorists who are systematically killing us with opioids and responsible for 110,236 deaths in 2022.  If there was any other single issue causing 302 deaths daily of young people the nation would be up in arms demanding the president take immediate action. 

No president in our history has knowingly and deliberately threatened our national security to this degree.

BACKGROUND: The Mexican Cartels are a narco-terrorist organization operating inside the U.S. and they are gaining ground every day.

By comparison, ISIS is a terrorist organization that took up lodging in Syria and Iraq and created a separate state from 2014 through 2017. The U.S. was instrumental in eliminating ISIS leaders and collapsing their caliphate.

The cartels in Mexico have essentially done the same thing as ISIS. The primary actors are the Sinaloa Cartel, for many years the most dominant drug trafficking organization in Mexico. Cartel Jalisco is the emerging power; engaged in drug trafficking, kidnapping, extortion, oil pipeline tapping and general criminal activity. Additionally in the mix is the Los Zetas Cartel, Gulf Cartel and Juarez Cartel. All are engaged in holding their current territory and/or expanding their territory thus creating one of the most violent areas in the world today with an enormous impact on the Mexican economy and society as a whole.

The Sinaloa and Jalisco Cartels have each split into 35-40 subordinate cells each with a chain of command similar to paramilitary organizations.   

In addition to the cartels, over the past few years there have been about 400 new gangs and splinter groups formed to challenge the cartels; all of which has overwhelmed Mexican law enforcement.

A footnote to all of this is that fentanyl has changed everything. It is so profitable and can be moved in such small quantities thereby making the cartels even more empowered and enriched.

So, what are Mexican and American leaders doing about all this?

President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, elected in 2018, has undertaken a non-confrontational security strategy against some of the most violent originations in the world, which he has referred to as “hugs not guns.”  February 28th 2023, during his morning briefing President Lopez Obrador stated, “Here we do not produce fentanyl, and we do not have consumption of fentanyl.”  Surprise, his “hugs” strategy is not working. President Biden’s response to the narco-terrorists is, “the border is secure.” Let’s call it the head-in-the-sand security strategy.  Both are pathetic, disappointing, an insult to our intelligence and clearly in violation of their oaths of office.

On March 3rd, four U.S. citizens were kidnapped in Mexico; two of them were killed. At his daily news conference President Lopez Obrador said “we are working and cooperating with our American counterparts.”; but that his government wouldn’t allow “foreign countries” to intervene.

On 7 March Senator Lindsey Graham said he will introduce a bill in Congress to set the stage for the U.S. to use military force in Mexico.

On 9 March Lopez Obrador called plans for U.S. military action against the cartels, “irresponsible.”

On 13 March Lopez Obrador made additional comments, “Mexico is safer than the United States; there is no problem traveling safely in Mexico.”  By the way, Mexico’s nationwide homicide rate is 28 per 100,000 inhabitants while the U.S. is one quarter as high.

On 18 March President Lopez Obrador spoke out again with these words of wisdom to sum up the fentanyl problem in America, “There’s a disintegration of families; there is a lot of individualism, there is a lack of love, of brotherhood, of hugs and embraces.”  Then he went on to promise Republicans they will not see a single vote from Mexican or Hispanic voters living in the U.S.

The Biden administration never misses an opportunity to show off a confiscated shipment of drugs from Mexico. A recent event included more than 4.5 million fentanyl pills, 140 pounds of fentanyl powder, 3,000 pounds of methamphetamine and 135 kilograms of cocaine in all, totaling a street value of roughly $13 million. But the take-away form this comes from Anthony Coulson, a retired DEA special agent, who pointed out that. “A $13 million loss won’t stop the Sinaloa cartel, first because it’s a drop in the bucket, and second, because this is to be expected. An insignificant loss such as this is just a normal part of their operation.”

What the Biden Administration will not do is speculate on the estimated quantity of drugs that do not get confiscated.

CARTELS, HOW THEY OPERATE:

The cartels are violent organizations engaged almost continuously in turf battles with rival cartels.  Additionally, cartels are known to use a portion of their vast profits to pay off judges, police, military and politicians. Should the individuals reject the bribe their families will likely be at risk of torture, kidnapping or worse.

U.S. gangs have an important role in cartel ops. The FBI reports there are about 33,000 violent street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs criminally active in the U.S. today with about 1.4 million members.  Additionally, the number of street gang members is increasing in 49% of FBI jurisdictions. Many gangs are sophisticated and well organized; all use violence to control neighborhoods and boost their illegal money-making activities, which include robbery, drug and gun trafficking, prostitution and human trafficking.

The relationship between the U.S. gangs and the cartels is that the gangs represent an in-place nation-wide resource of foot soldiers for drug distribution and street sales.

Cartels excel at getting drugs over the border; then, for the most part, they cede operations in the U.S. to local or regional groups. The Drug Enforcement Agency’s 2023 assessment is that Mexican Cartels have operations in at least 60 American cities.

There are no accurate estimates of the cartels’ income but it is certainly in the billions of dollars.

Most of the illicit drugs entering the U.S. that are seized by authorities are discovered at the 300-plus official ports of entry. More than 90% of the Meth, fentanyl and heroin seized is at ports of entry.

THE FENTANYL TRIP:

Fentanyl, which often gets mixed with heroin or cocaine is 50 times stronger than heroin and 100 times more powerful than morphine. It’s also cheaper to produce than either of those drugs.

In 2022, a record-setting 14,700 pounds of fentanyl shipments was seized by US Customs and Border Protection agents; there has already been 12,500 pounds confiscated in 2023. But that’s just a fraction of what enters the U.S.

Here’s how fentanyl gets from China to America’s streets; data taken from an article in the NEW YORK POST, February 18, 2023 by Michael Kaplan.

STEP 1: China to the west coast of Mexico.

Chinese chemists produce powdered chemicals known as “precursors” that are fentanyl’s building blocks. It is not unusual for the precursors to be packages looking like dog food.

Approximate value of the precursor, $200 per kilogram  It is interesting to watch the price grow as the journey continues so I will print them in bold type.

STEP 2: Mexico,

There is so much corruption at the ports that a couple hundred bucks will make authorities look the other way as chemicals are unloaded.

“Laboratory” is a glorified word for the Mexican fentanyl production facilities. Much of the fentanyl is brewed outside in pots over open flames where the “cook” tries to stay up-wind in order to live through the process The drugs get diluted, mixed with other chemicals and the final product is either powder or fentanyl pressed into pills that resemble pharmaceuticals or candy.

Approximate value per kilogram: $3,000 to $5,000 (depending on purity).

STEP 3: Crossing the border.

Drug dealers routinely stash the fentanyl in trucks, usually mixed in with other shipping products. With 200,000 vehicles crossing the Mexico/US border each day, it’s not difficult for the deadly cargo to slip through.

Approximate value per kilogram: $20,000

STEP 4: Urban hubs. Once over the border, the idea is to quickly reach a drop-off spot. For example, before drugs enter New York City, there is often a distribution point where the trucker will rendezvous with smaller vehicles.

Approximate value per kilogram: $35,000

STEP 5: Drug mills

Inside apartments, houses, garages, wherever it is convenient, fentanyl is cut with adulterants and sealed in glassine (smooth and glossy paper that is air, water and grease resistant) envelopes that contain single-sized doses.  A crew of 12 can package 100,000 glassines in 24

hours. On the street a glassine packet becomes a $10 sale.

One glassine usually contains less than two milligrams of fentanyl. Keep in mind that there are 28,000 milligrams in one ounce. According to the DEA, two milligrams of fentanyl constitute a lethal dose.

Approximate value per kilogram: $300,000

STEP 6: From the streets to the user. This is where U.S. gangs become an important part of the cartels’ distribution plan.

Wholesalers’ pick-up glassine-enveloped goods from the drug mill and then meet up with their street dealers. Street dealers make approximately $2 for each $10 bag of fentanyl that they sell to their customers.

Approximate value per kilogram: $1 million; from $200 per kilogram leaving China to $1 million on U.S. streets.

And once on the streets, fentanyl is killing, on average, 200 young Americans every day.

AUTHORITY TO USE THE U.S. MILITARY IN MEXICO:

Can the U.S. use military force inside Mexico to defeat the cartels? Former Attorney General William Barr, I assume after extensive research by his Justice Department staff, believes so.  In 2020 he wrote;

What will it take to defeat the Mexican cartels? First, a far more aggressive American effort inside Mexico than ever before, including a significant U.S. law-enforcement and intelligence presence, as well as select military capabilities. Optimally, the Mexican government will support and participate in this effort, and it is likely to do so once they understand that the U.S. is committed to do whatever is necessary to cripple the cartels, whether or not the Mexican government participates.

Second, the danger cartels pose to the U.S. requires that we confront them primarily as national-security threats, not a law-enforcement matter. These narco-terrorist groups are more like ISIS than like the American mafia. The only way to defeat them is to use every tool at our disposal inside Mexico.”

Constitutional War Powers, Article II, Section 2 grants the President the power to direct the military after a declaration of war by Congress.

Presidential Policy Guidance on Procedures for Approving Direct Action Against Terrorist Targets Located Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities (PPG): Put into place under the Obama administration, the PPG established standard operating procedures for circumstances when the U.S. takes direct action against terrorist targets outside of the US and outside of areas of active hostilities.

Article 51 of the United Nations Charter specifies that, “Nothing in this Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs.”  The U.S. interpretation of the Charter recognizes three circumstances under which the use of force is permitted: 1) the use of force authorized by the UN Security Council under Chapter VII of the Charter; 2) the use of force in self-defense, including against imminent attacks; and 3) the use of force in an otherwise lawful manner with the consent of the territorial state.

Some examples of the U.S. engaging terrorists in foreign nations in the past:

Somalia. Operations against al-Shabaab terrorists with the consent of the government of Somalia in furtherance of U.S. national self-defense.

Libya. Operations against Daesh were conducted 2015-2019 with the consent of the Government of National Accord in furtherance of U.S. national self-defense.

YemenOperations against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula have been conducted since 2015.

Given the above, one could argue that the cartels have become a clear and present danger to the United States; that Congress has acknowledged inherent executive power in accordance with the Joint Resolution passed by Congress on September 14, 2001 which states the President may deploy military force preemptively against terrorist organizations in the states that harbor or support them, whether or not they can be linked to the specific terrorist incidents of September 11.

CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUR MILITARY IN MEXICO:

Begin by defining the overarching Rules of Engagement, ROE. 

  1. Trust no one.  Too many Mexican politicians, law enforcement and military at all levels are on the cartels’ payroll, accepting bribes and/or living under threat of violence for themselves and their families. 

Case in point: A former Mexican presidential cabinet member, Garcia Luna, was convicted February 2023 in the U.S. for taking bribes to protect the violent drug cartels. He has been sentenced to 20 years in prison.  Note he was convicted in the U.S., not in Mexico.

2. The second ROE is to secretly develop detailed strategic and tactical plans before any U.S. forces are introduced into Mexico.

3. Conduct Mexico-wide operations without a significant military foot-print inside Mexico.

4. Do all of this with, at least, tacit approval by President Lopez Obrador.

5. All of the planning and on into execution must be Close Hold, Need-to-Know only. There will be no media briefs in order to preserve and protect military Opsec, Operational Security.

January 2023 , Reps. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, and Michael Waltz, R-Fla., introduced a joint resolution authorizing Biden to use military force to combat the cartels pumping fentanyl and other similar, dangerous substances across the border. Pass this resolution ASAP.

March 2023, Senator Lindsey Graham announced he would introduce legislation designating Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and granting Biden authority to use American troops in Mexico. Pass this legislation ASAP.

Having passed the above legislation, Presidents Biden and Lopez Obrador should secretly meet for a weekend working session at Biden’s home in Delaware. The Biden team should consist of the JSOC Commander (Joint Special Operations Command), CIA Director and the Director of National Intelligence. Of course, there could be a very long list of senior government officials (Sec Def, Joint Chiefs, Secretary Homeland Security, etc. etc.) who believe they should be included. But therein lies a big problem. Each would have subordinates working on remarks, power point slides, fact sheets, position papers, etc. Questions would be asked down the chains of command and within a few days thousands would be on the Close Hold, Need-to-Know list followed by headlines in the Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, etc. The cartels would be ready and negative world opinion (China, Russia, etc.) would flood back to President Biden. 

The point of the meeting is for President Biden to assert to his Mexican counterpart that his country is in serious trouble, his government has lost control of large sections of territory, it is getting worse, it is negatively impacting the U.S. and we have no intentions of having a narco-terrorists nation, the likes of ISIS, on our southern border. We are not asking for permission but very much want Lopez Obrador’s blessing and cooperation.

President Biden then turns the meeting over to the JSOC Commander who will explain that tanks will not be rolling south, the 82nd Airborne Division will not be parachuting into Sinaloa State, and we have no intention to subsume control of Mexico.

Commander JSOC will go on to explain that the military footprint inside Mexico will be almost invisible. This will be a war fought at night by special operations forces; namely, Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, Army Rangers, Army Special Forces and Army Delta Force.  You will not see US military vehicles patrolling your countryside, road blocks, checkpoints, or military formations attacking Cartel militias.  

President Biden interjects to explain that what President Lopez Obrador will see and hear is that Cartel leaders are missing, their chains of command are being killed and captured, incoming supplies and outgoing products are not on schedule, production facilities are disappearing and cartels are blaming other cartels for a takeover of their territory. This will allow Mexican military and law enforcement to go on the offensive and regain control of territory and generally reduce the violence.  

The meeting will then be turned over to the Director of National Intelligence who will explain that every operational collection element of the U.S. intelligence inventory will be focused on Mexico. These intel capabilities will be temporarily placed under the operational control of a special intel task force for Operation Cartel. Of particular importance will be Humint, Human intelligence. Because of the decentralized, mom-and-pop production of fentanyl powder and tablets, we need a nation-wide Humint collection effort. Find a production facility today, take it out tonight. Find a collection point today, take it out tonight. Locate cartel leaders, at every level, today take them out tonight. 

The Director of National Intelligence will go on to explain that every intel organization in the U.S. will be tasked to provide all of their individuals of Latin American heritage to be temporarily assigned to a CIA-led Operation Cartel task force for human intel collection. They will be given credentials for in-country personal security, inserted into communities all over Mexico, begin building local cells and reporting findings.

Drones of every size and capability will fill the sky; surveillance drones with real-time downlinks to Special Operations forces on the ground; drones armed with 16 Hellfire missiles in the air and on station for immediate use by ground forces against high-value targets and targets of opportunity.

Tell the Mexican president that nothing that has been discussed during the meeting will be disclosed to the media and especially not to his subordinates; politicians, military or law enforcement. The first ROE will be immediately applicable; trust no one.

The applicable elements of the U.S. government will begin immediately to transform the concept into a phased plan for execution of actionable intelligence.  Every element will be placed under the operational control of he JSOC Commander for phase 1, planning (about six weeks) and throughout the execution phases. The intent is to begin operations with a Mexico-wide shock-and-awe attack on headquarters, production facilities, collection/distribution points and supply chains to immediately put the cartels on their heels and in a defensive mode. Then increase the operational tempo to the maximum extent.

CONCLUSIONS:

 Mexico is in deep trouble. Cartels are gaining ground every day and Lopez Obrador’s strategy of, “Hugs, not guns” is going nowhere at the speed of heat.  The U.S. has no plan. The U.S. and Mexico must help each other.  Put the cartels back on their heels and give Mexico’s law enforcement and military the confidence to wade in and finish the job.

While taking out the cartels, the U.S. must completely rethink its operations at the 300-plus ports of entry. Over 90% of all the hard drugs confiscated is accomplished at the ports of entry. While that is good news, it also implies that there is such an enormous volume that gets by and on the streets.

Going back to a previous note, the FBI reports there are about 33,000 violent street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs criminally active in the U.S. today with about 1.4 million members. We desperately need to do something about that.  One suggestion: Designate criminal gangs as domestic terrorists.  Humint in local communities should readily reveal the leaders’ names.  The FBI should arrest them, eventually have them tried, convicted and locked up.  When the replacement leaders emerge, ditto. At some point there will be a lot less than 33,000 gangs.  The upside of this is that the cartels will lose their drug distribution/sales foot soldiers and secondly, the overall crime wave across the nation should abate. 

The Drug Enforcement Agency has to do more and better. If DEA, border patrol and the FBI need more people, take the 87,000 that were planning to be needlessly added to the IRS.

None of this will matter unless President Biden will do a one-eighty and close the damned border and move towards accomplishing the president’s number one priority; the safety and security of all Americans.

BOTTOM LINE:

This plan is a futile effort.  Biden is hell-bent on keeping the border open and thereby being complicit in supporting the Mexican cartels and simultaneously endangering an important neighbor and our second largest trading partner.

Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of two books, Vision to Execution and Fix the Systems, Transform America as well as the author of a blog, WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.

BUSINESSES: REGULATIONS, RULES AND TAXES

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.” Ayn Rand.  Strikes a nerve doesn’t it?

BACKGROUND AND STATS: The Obama/Biden administration set the stage for a regulation nation, Trump made progress in reducing bureaucratic controls but Biden, the good Obama student, is back at it.  During the first three years of the Obama/Biden rule, 1106 new major federal regulations added more than $46 billion per year in new costs for Americans.  That was four times the number and more than five times the cost of the major regulations issued by President Bush,43, in his first three years.

But 2009-2012 was just the warm up for the Obama/Biden regulation nation. January, 2014, “We are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help that they need. I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone.” President Obama

In their sprint to the finish in 2016 nearly 4000 regulations made their way through the federal bureaucracy, costing billions of dollars per year and wreaking havoc on American businesses in particular.

President Reagan aptly described that concept of leading the nation; “Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”

In 2017, a week after the inauguration, President Trump sent a message to the Congress, the government bureaucracy and the American people with his Executive Order, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs”, that required agencies to revoke two regulations for every new rule they want to issue.

On 20 January, 2021 a few hours after being sworn in, President Biden cancelled the Trump 2 for 1 Executive Order.

In 2020, the Trump administration’s regulatory costs were about $20 billion. In 2021, Biden’s first year, the cost exploded to approximately $200 billion.

In 24 months, Biden has demonstrated he is hell-bent on an unprecedented expansion of the regulation nation. According to the American Action Forum, Biden has imposed 517 regulatory actions costing some $318 billion.  By comparison in four years Trump imposed rules at $64.7 billion in net regulatory costs. 

The Constitution specifically gives the power to pass laws to Congress, not agencies. Yet in 2021 federal agencies issued 3,257 rules based on 143 laws. In 2022 another 3,168 rules were added to the Federal Register based on 247 laws.  But as the saying goes, “You ain’t seen nothing yet.” Agencies are hard at work writing the regulations and rules that will be necessary to cover the 4,155-page, $1.7 trillion government funding bill passed December, 2022.

Under Trump, calendar year 2019 concluded with 21,964 final rules in the Federal Register which was the lowest count since records began being kept in the 1970’s.

In Trump’s first year, 2017, the Federal Register finished at 61,308 pages the lowest count since 1993 and a drop of 36% from Obama’s 95,894 pages in 2016 which was the highest in history.

REGULATIONS IMPACT: Regulations are a tax on every American. The Competitive Enterprise Institute estimates that overall regulatory costs to the economy are at least $2 trillion; about 8% of the gross domestic product. If you think of regulation costs as a tax, it would be larger than federal income tax. Or, if it was a country, U.S. regulation would be the world’s eighth-largest economy.

As President Calvin Coolidge reminded us 100 years ago, “The business of America is business.”  But:

  • Mounting regulations reduce business start-ups; it’s just too hard to counter the massive government red tape.
  • Meeting regulatory requirements costs businesses time and money.
  • Regulations can kill the American entrepreneurial spirit that made this the greatest nation on earth.
  • Mounting regulations slow overall Gross Domestic Product growth and negatively impact everything consumers. During an inflationary period, the last thing we need is more regulation trauma that further raises prices.
  • Forbes reported that a 10% increase in total regulation leads to about a 1% increase in prices and most often impacts low-income households.

While large corporations across America get the spotlight, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration, 99.9% of American businesses are “small” and there are 33.2 million of them. They employ 61.7 million workers, 46.4% of all U.S. employees.

FOR EXAMPLE: Here is one of the thousands of federal and state regulations creating a hostile business environment for small business.  

With the aim of combating wage discrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC requires employers with 100 or more workers to report how much they pay workers, broken down by sex and ethnicity. The form for doing so includes 12 rows for different pay levels in 10 broad job categories, ranging from executives to service workers. For each of these rows, there are 15 columns identifying employees by gender and ethnicity; white, black, Latino, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Asian, Native American, Alaska Native, or “Two or More Races.” Employers also would have to tally the total number of hours worked by employees in each pay band over the past 12 months.

It’s easy to see possibly three problems associated with this report.  First, it’s just a mass of raw numbers. But raw numbers could be misleading because pay disparity could be legitimately due to factors such as seniority, training or decisions workers make on whether to work overtime.

The second problem has to do with perceptions. The EEOC bureaucrats’ most senior boss, aka President Biden, has told the Executive Branch and the American people in prepared remarks, June 2021, that, “White supremacy is the most lethal terrorist threat to America.”  Armed with that guidance from the president, the bureaucrats logically begin to execute their mission by looking at, you guessed it, business owners who are white. 

The third problem is that the regulation exists because of the assumption that wage disparity is so rampant in America that the federal government has to take it on. With that assumption underpinning the whole operation, one weaponized bureaucrat’s conclusions from the raw data can bring the force of the federal government down on large numbers of business owners, strangling them with red tape and legal fees

“The most terrifying words in the English language are; I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.” Ronald Reagan.

NATIONAL SECURITY:  Then there are the senior bureaucrats who can, on their own initiative bend the rules and regulations just enough to produce an outcome that is favourable to their personal viewpoint but not in the best interest of We-The-People or U.S. business.  Case in point is an on-going issue called the Willow Project.  It is part of a decades-long oil drilling venture on Alaska’s North Slope in the National Petroleum Reserve which is owned by the federal government.

First, let’s be clear about the importance of drilling our own oil.  Given the strategically challenging world we live in, energy independence, achieved in 2019 for the first time in 62 years, is a critical national security issue right up there with illegal immigration.

What we should know about the Willow Project:

  • ConocoPhillips acquired its first Willow leases in 1999. Willow is an $8 billion business investment.
  • The National Petroleum Reserve is an area the size of Indiana that Congress specifically set aside for oil development.
  • The project would occupy 0.002% of the National Petroleum Reserve.
  • It would use the existing Alaska pipeline and require no new roads.
  • Willow is capable of providing 180,000 barrels a day from its estimated 600-million-barrel reserve.
  • It would employ 2500 workers, mostly union labour construction jobs.
  • The project has passed every environmental analysis.
  • It has been signed off by every concerned agency to include Fish & Wildlife and the Army Corps of Engineers.
  • Willow is a low-carbon project approved by the Bureau of Land Management.
  • It would generate about $17 billion in new revenue for the feds, the state of Alaska and the North Slope Native communities.
  • The project has overwhelming bipartisan support in Alaska.
  • The Bureau of Land Management issued a statement, “In the absence of production from Willow, energy production from this project’s oil would be replaced by other sources around the globe.”  Which, of course, would include the likes of Venezuela.
  • The final regulatory review was completed in early February

What’s not to like about this project? Notwithstanding the national security issues associated with Willow, the single-focused anti-fossil-fuel crowd is naturally against it.  They have organized online activism to include more than one million letters to the White House and a petition with more than 2.9 million signatures.

Within minutes of her own BLM scientists issuing their favourable report, Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland issued a statement citing “substantial concerns.” Haaland has refused to meet with a delegation of pro-Willow Alaskan Natives who are advocating for the project. Where are her “substantial concerns” over our national security in light of the world’s growing energy security issues and Biden’s depleted strategic oil reserves?

While campaigning for a seat in the House of Representatives in 2018, Haaland stated, “As a Native American woman whose ancestral homeland is under attack from the Fossil Fuel Industry, I 100% support a Green New deal and a Congressional Climate Commission.”

As a new member of Congress in 2019 Haaland stated, “I am wholeheartedly against fracking and drilling on public lands.”

In order to be most efficient and effective with their $8 billion investment, ConocoPhillips is proposing construction of five drilling pads. During its review, the Bureau of Land Management suggested that three drilling pads may be sufficient. What Secretary Haaland can, and may do, in spite of all the approvals by her internal professionals’ advice, is to approve the project but limit the scope to less than three drilling pads. This would effectively kill the project in that ConocoPhillips has already declared less than three drilling pads is economically infeasible.

Additionally, it was reported this week that the production from existing industry-wide drilling was down significantly during 2022; there is a need for new drilling projects. This nation is a long way from the point where we can forget about having a steady, reliable supply of gas and oil. Biden proved that on day-one of his administration when he gutted the energy industry with a stroke of his pen and thereby negatively impacted the financial security of every American with $5 a gallon gas and $5.81 for diesel that drove the inflation equation.

Secretary Haaland’s “substantial concerns” serves to demonstrate the rules and regulations power in the hands of top-tier bureaucrats. 

TAXING BUSINESSES: Let’s begin with some sage advice from Winston Churchill: “I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.” Don’t you love it?

Biden, last week, “I’m going to raise your taxes,” Wow, is he ever; he is proposing $5 trillion in new tax revenue over the next 10 years. Among his business tax proposals is raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%, which would affect all the big corporations and about one million small businesses organized as corporations.

Biden, for the last three years, “I will not raise taxes on those making less than $400,000” Well, I’m sorry Mr. President that is not true; you know it, your economic advisors know it but it is a great sound bite and you use it because you and all of your Democrats believe We-The-People are too dumb to know any better. 

Let me explain it to you one more time Mr. and Mrs. Democrat. Almost 100% of all large corporations and all 33.2 million small business have one thing in common; their balance sheets’ bottom line consists of two main issues, income and expenses.

READER CAUTION:  If you read on, I’m sure what I have written will insult your intelligence because its third-grade math.  But I want to get this on record as the nonsense the White House handlers are putting on the president’s teleprompter.

If you subtract the expenses from the income, you have profit; the end game for every business. When expenses go up (tax is an expense, just like the light bill) and the income remains the same, guess what; profit goes down.  When the profit margin becomes untenable something has to change; the most probable way to remedy that is to raise prices and thereby increase income. 

Headline Mr. President, when prices go up everyone is negatively impacted. Tax is just another expense in the business world; businesses may write the check to the IRS but it is the consumer who actually pays the tax.  By the way, Mr. President 99% of Americans make less than $400,000 per year.  So please stop with the, “I will not raise taxes on those making less than $400,000.”  Business don’t pay taxes, people do.

 CONCLUSIONS:

 Over the decades we have grown a federal bureaucracy which is now at the point of independent power and control that is not in the best interest of our nation.

We should not be driven by single-issue activists who can make enough noise to turn bureaucrat leaders against the best interests of all Americans.

Energy dependence is a critical national security issue that should not be left in the hands of uninformed activists.

As of 11 March, Secretary Haaland had not issued a decision the Willow project.

BOTTOM LINE:  Obama/Biden figured out how to weaponize the bureaucracy and use it against businesses, national security and the American people.  Biden has taken weaponization to an art form. 

Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of VISION TO EXECUTION, a book for leaders, and a new book May 2022, FIX THE SYSTEMS, TRANSFORM AMERICA as well as the author of a blog WeThePeopleSpeaking.com