THE “EDUCATION PRESIDENT”?

Joe and Jill Biden appeared at a National Education Association gathering on the 4th of July.  Jill introduced her husband emphatically referring to him as the “education President.” (Question, are we to assume this is another moniker to go along with Biden’s self-designated title, “Bidenomics president?”)   Moving on, I take “education president” as a short-hand way of implying that he has fostered plans and programs to get education out of its present pathetic performance mess. Before we make that leap of faith, perhaps we should review the bidding on Biden’s education track record. 

EDUCATION IN AMERICA TODAY:

One, public education is facing a crisis of epic proportions by flooding society with functionally illiterate high school graduates. 

Two, proficiency levels in all subjects took a nose-dive during the pandemic.

Three, proficiency levels have continued to decline in the post-pandemic school year.

Four, poor education and high drop-out numbers are particularly harmful to minorities and low-income families.

Five, Biden will not talk about the above four facts.

BACKGROUND:

The best way to nail down a definition of the education problem is to look at data from the reputable National Assessment of Education Progress:

Math:

4th grade, 67% are below Proficiency level.

8th grade, 75% are below Proficiency level.

12th grade, 76% are below Proficiency level.

Reading: 

4th grade, 68% are below Proficient level.                

8th grade, 71% are below Proficient level.

12th grade, 63% are below Proficiency level.

This data is a combination of results from both charter schools and traditional public schools (TPS). The Wall Street Journal recently reported that independently run schools, commonly referred to as charter schools, are, “blowing away their traditional public-school competition in student performance.” 

Stanford’s Center for Research on Education Outcome, (CREDO) has been tracking charter school performance since 2009 covering over two million charter students in 29 states.

In 2009, CREDO’s study concluded that charters did not provide better performance outcomes than TPS. However, the latest review found that charters “advanced more than their TPS peers by a large margin in math and reading.”

One reason this charter vs TPS discussion is so important is that school choice has become a national political issue, generally with the Republican Party advocating for the advancement of school choice and the Democrat Party limiting school choice in general and charter schools in particular.

CHARTER SCHOOL DEFINED:

Public charter schools served 3.7 million students in 7,800 schools during the 2020-2021 school year which is 7.5% of all public-school students. And charters have waiting lists for millions more.  It is important to note that 69% of charter students are minority and two-thirds are from low-income households.

Facts shared by nearly all the states: Charter schools are authorized by the State Boards of Education. Charter schools are tuition-free schools of choice that are operated mostly by independent non-profit boards of directors. 

The two major teachers’ unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) consistently spread false information against charter schools. 

  • Lie # 1: “Charter schools are unaccountable, private schools that take money away from district schools.” Truth: Charter schools are 100% accountable to state authorities. Charter school students are typically funded at $0.73/dollar compared to TPS students.
  • Lie # 2: “Charter schools don’t serve a diverse population of students; they get to hand pick their students to populate their schools.” The truth is, if a child is eligible to attend a public government school, parents may apply to any charter school.  If a charter school receives more applications than its capacity, a lottery is conducted. Discrimination based on race, national origin, or religion is prohibited. While only 4% of traditional public schools have student bodies that are 99% minority, 17% of charter schools are 99% minority.
  • Lie # 3: “Charter schools are not academically superior to government-run public schools.”  Truth: In New York City, for example, in a number of minority communities, traditional public school and charter school classes are co-located in a common building.  In one co-mingled building, in 28 different classes, less than 10% of the government-run public school students tested to a proficient level while 81-100% of charter students were proficient.

Why do charter school students perform better?  Government-run public schools are top-down highly regulated vs charters with their own organization, planning and programs allowing them the freedom to

use innovative school models and customized approaches to curriculum, staffing, budgeting and teaching. The bottom line is that attributes like organization, innovation and freedom make a difference in any organization. Charters feel less constrained and every day are seeking to be all they can be for students and parents.

This is a summary of what the teachers’ union leaders are telling we-the-people about charter schools: Charter schools are privately-operated, deregulated, segregated, poorly-supervised, de-unionized scandal-ridden contract schools that drain much-needed funds from demonized public schools.  Those descriptions are all lies.

To illustrate how out-of-control the teachers unions can get, when California was considering sending teachers back into the classroom in 2021, the Los Angeles Teachers’ Union made the following demands: “defund the police, a moratorium on new charter schools, new wealth taxes on California millionaires and billionaires and Medicare-for-all at the federal level.” Three questions come to mind: 1) How did they get so far out of their lane?  2) Why are they a decision-maker on when teachers return to the classroom? 3) How did they get that much power and influence?

FAILING SCHOOLS:

Almost 2,000 high schools across the U.S. graduate less than 60% of their students. Those “dropout factories” account for over 50% of the students who leave school every year. One in six students attend a dropout factory.  One in three minority students (32%) attend a dropout factory compared to 8% of white students.

The key question is, what happens to these failing government-run public schools?  Usually nothing.

By contrast, if charter students do not measure up to standards, the school is subject to being shut down by state law.  Is accountability important in education?  Yes, it is the ultimate arbiter.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND EDUCATION:

February 2020, Biden campaigning in South Carolina, “I am not a charter school fan.” No explanation as to why he not a fan.

Biden during the 2020 campaign: “There are some charter schools that work.”  Wow, what a resounding endorsement!  And, “I will stop all federal funding for for-profit charter schools.” Only about 16 percent of charter schools across the country are operated by for-profit entities.

2021, a small provision tucked into a massive federal budget proposal put forth by the Democrat House Appropriations Committee would cut money for charter schools by $40 million and could potentially limit many charter schools from receiving federal funds altogether.

March 2022, the Biden administration’s Office of Elementary and Secondary Education issued 13 pages of rules designed to cut off charter schools from federal support and that will likely serve as a model for state regulations limiting charters. One of the new regulations essentially provides public schools with veto power over a decision to locate a charter school in their area.Newsweek, “A plain reading of the text makes the absurdity obvious. Charter schools compete with public schools. The Biden Administration is trying to force charters to be subservient to traditional public schools.”

Leaders across the charter school community have said the new requirements would quell the growth of such schools.

MAY 2023, new rules proposed by the Education Department to govern a federal grant program for charter schools are drawing bipartisan backlash and angering parents, who say the Biden administration is seeking to stymie schools that have fallen out of favor with many Democrats but maintain strong support among Black and Latino families.

CONCLUSIONS

The U.S. is becoming increasingly more functionally illiterate. Covid was a setback in terms of the numbers of K-12 students who are not proficient in all of their subjects; but results from Covid are an anomaly in an ongoing national education crisis; post-pandemic proficiency is still on the decline.  

Various studies and statistics tell us that students who come from lower-income families or students who are English language learners have higher success and performance rates in charter schools than their public-school counterparts.

Generally, across the nation, charter school students score higher on achievement tests than students in government-run public schools.

A study from Bellwether Education Partners shows charter schools are finding what works through innovation, replicating their success and ultimately producing accelerated achievement gains for students.

BOTTOM LINE:

If we want to help minority Americans, we need to give them a better education and thereafter a better chance at a better life. But our education president’s track record speaks for itself; he will forego desperately needed improvement in education because of his blind fanatical support for unions.

Mr. President, listen to Americans and then build policies to support them; 67% of voters support school choice and it is increasing every year. Stop your senseless pandering to unions; they are not part of the education solution.  We have an education national crisis and you won’t even talk about it. Obviously, you are not actively looking for solutions with your anti-charter school stance. You, Mr. president, with your leadership of the Democrat Party, are standing in the way of potential progress especially for minorities and low-income families; those you profess to care about. Your conduct is shameful and unamerican.   

The Wall Street Journal has an insightful concluding remark in their article, “The real reason the unions object to more charter schools is that charter school learning proves there is no excuse for failing children.”  Amen.

Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of VISION TO EXECUTION, a book for leaders, and a new book May 2022, FIX THE SYSTEMS, TRANSFORM AMERICA as well as the author of a blog WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.

RNC, HELLO, ANYONE HOME…..HELLO….?

NEWS FLASH:  The 2024 campaign is well underway.  What are the Republicans generally campaigning for? What are the new policy initiatives? What are the priorities?  What are we against? How can I find out more about the 2024 Republican Platform?  Good questions; let’s go to the RNC website and get some answers. 

OK, I’m in the RNC website; here is the platform page:

“RESOLUTION REGARDING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM”

During the 2020 presidential campaign, because of Covid, the Platform Committee did not meet. While the remainder of society was conducting business via zoom the Republican Party powers-that-be decided to take a pass.  After all, it was just a campaign for the Presidency, 35 Senators, the entire House of Representatives, 11 governors and 44 state legislatures.  Just 78 days before the 2020 presidential election, on 22 August, 2020, the RNC published these applicable Resolutions:

“RESOLVED, that the 2020 Republican National Convention will adjourn without adopting a new platform until the 2024 Republican National Convention;

RESOLVED, that any motion to amend the 2016 Platform or to adopt a new platform, including any motion to suspend the procedures that will allow doing so, will be ruled out of order.”

If you are one of the thousands of Republicans who will be campaigning over the next year and you want to be on-board with what the Republican Party is all about, go to this page in today’s RNC website:

“REPUBLICAN

PLATFORM

2016”

That’s it, that’s all the RNC has to offer the thousands of Republican candidates across the country until the Republican National Convention 15-18 July NEXT YEAR.

Let’s step back and take a look at the lunacy of this entire platform business. If this was a normal functioning organization, the presidential campaign would be looked upon as a long-range (four year) on-going, strategic planning process.  The RNC’s Campaign OPPLAN 2024 would consist of some number of phases. Phase 1 would be the RNC planning phase and would take about 30 days to lay out the whole program. Campaign OPPLAN 2024 could/should contain the following elements:  

  • Define a realistic end state.
  • Draft a mission statement for everyone to see and understand.
  • Provide a statement of the RNC’s intent for the 4-year plan.  
  • Develop Centers of gravity for each phase; i.e., a place, person, thing belief, circumstance or condition that is central to success or could possibly cause failure in that phase. Track them every day.
  • Specify how the RNC will organize for action:

–Have a 2024 War Council: A few of the best and brightest at the RNC headquarters who can be brought together at any moment to provide the boss with some immediate comments on a new proposal or crisis issue.

–Have a 2024 Red Team: A small group at the RNC Headquarters who are tasked to be knowledgeable about everything the Democrats are doing/saying/thinking and how they believe the Democrat Party will respond to each RNC initiative.

—Have a 2024 Kitchen Cabinet consisting of three or four grey-beards who are highly respected experienced Republicans (the likes of former Secretary of Education, William Bennett) who will be consulted on every large issue and are invited to provide advice even when not asked.

–organize 2024 Review and Analysis Teams: Example, Biden gets behind a microphone and proclaims, “Today my administration announced that this year the deficit fell by $1.4 trillion, the largest one-year drop in American history.” An R&A team will be assigned to immediately (within minutes) get on it.  They will fact check the statement, do some quick research on what the real deficit will be and get a Fact Sheet posted on the RNC website by close-of- business THAT DAY. Have a system in place that would allow the thousands of Republican candidates to be an R&A Subscriber; meaning, they will get an alert any time an R&A fact sheet is published. Result, get the Republican Party aligned and energized on the issue-of-the-day.

Back to the Republican Platform document. The platform should be a central feature of Campaign OPPLAN 2024. But and this is a huge “but”, we cannot/should not wait until the Republican National Convention 15-18 July of 2024 for the Republican Platform Committee to meet and draft a 2024 Platform document.  This is simply the dumbest possible sequence of events imaginable.  Candidates will have been actively campaigning for over a year without this major policy document in place. In fact, Presidential candidates are campaigning right now, today, with a worthless 2016 Republican Platform as their primary reference document. Who the hell is running this shit-show?

The Republican Platform should be a central feature of Campaign OPPLAN 2024.  It should be published early, perhaps in phase 2 or 3 of the OPLAN.

In the 2016 Platform there are about 90 different subjects in narrative form; many are outdated, some are too long, some too brief, there are different presentation formats, and many are lacking enough facts.  Additionally, the format is such that it is not easy for candidates to readily copy off a one-page subject with talking points for use during a campaign day. 

We need a Platform document that is a useful, convenient campaign tool-box.  For example, each subject should be presented in a stand-alone talking-paper formatted something like this:

SUBJECT: VOTER ID

CURRENT SITUATION: Use lots of facts, for example: There are X-million ineligible voters on existing voter registration rolls, X dead voters voted in 2020, X districts had more votes counted than existing eligible voters, voter fraud is associated with mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting and ballot drop boxes, State legislatures changed laws and rules during the voting period. Polls tell us XX% of Americans believe a voter should be able to provide a document proving their eligibility to vote. Etc.

DEMOCRAT POSITION: “Voter ID is racist

REPUBLICAN SOLUTION:  Briefly outline the voter ID reform law proposal.

CONCLUSIONS:  Free and honest elections are a cornerstone of this country.  We cannot allow election results to be in question. Voting is both a right and a responsibility.

The point of having a format is that it will be familiar, usable, brief and assist in getting Republican candidates across the nation aligned on the major issues of the day.

FINAL THOUGHTS:

The website issues are more complicated by the fact that there isn’t just one official website, there are two; www.gop.com and www.rnc.org. You have to open both to get the whole picture.  Crazy.

The RNC website is not, in its current state, a useful resource.  To make it more effective, first get the RNC organized for action around a Campaign OPPLAN 2024 and then build a supportive website around that concept.

Rule # 1, when making an assessment of any organization it is always helpful to begin by looking at the organization diagram. Starting at the top for the RNC, you will see, “Chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, Co-Chair Drew McKissick”.  Rule-of-thumb for leading an organization, when two people are in charge, no one is in charge. Co-chair?

BOTTOM LINE:

Without a Platform document, the Republican Party is already behind the power curve for the 2024 election. Get it done, now.

Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of VISION TO EXECUTION, a book for leaders, and a new book May 2022, FIX THE SYSTEMS, TRANSFORM AMERICA as well as the author of a blog WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.