WORLD PEACE FOREVER

NOW, FEBRUARY, 2025

During the first three weeks of President Trump’s new administration he:

Sent his Secretary of State to Panama to talk sense and send China a message about their intent to control the Canal.

Sent his Secretary of Defense to Europe to talk defense and deterrence.

Sent his Vice President to Europe to speak at the European Security Conference.

Successfully negotiated a prisoner release with Putin.

Planned for a meeting with Putin to discuss ending the war in Ukraine.

Met in the White House with Israeli President Netanyahu.

Met in the White House with India’s President Narendra Modi.

Met in the White House with a long-time friend to the United States,

Jordan’s King Abdullah.

Convinced Mexico President Sheinbaum to send 2,000 troops to help secure the Southern border.

Convinced Canadian Premier Trudeau to implement a set of sweeping new security measures along the U.S. Canadian border.

By suggesting that the U.S. rebuild Gaza he thoroughly embarrassed the terrorist-loving Palestinian nations who have refused to take in the millions of Gaza refugees.

Offered to buy Greenland.

In just a few days’ time, President Trump walked onto the world stage and made it crystal clear that he is not about to exit stage left any time soon. 

 The point being, there is every indication that President Trump is willing and able to think out of the box, think big and think about the welfare of everyone; in this case not just every American but everyone on earth.

Three years ago, I published a concept of operations for establishing world peace forever. Do we need it? As of January 2025, the Russian forces have suffered over 800,000 losses in the war in Ukraine; Again Israel  has had to fight off Palestinians on four fronts in order to survive; Iran is now part of the China/Russia/North Korea cabal; Rebels recently killed nearly 3,000 people in the city of Goma in the Republic of Conge; Iran can be a nuclear power in days or weeks; North Korea has, since 2021, fast-tracked its nuclear missile-delivery capability as a threat to the U.S.; terrorists are at work all over the world.

When the World Peace Forever concept was published, it was, at that time, a total waste of good ink. The entire Biden/Harris administration was incapable of comprehending or leading such an endeavor. 

Back to one of my favorite quotes from Shakespear, There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat, And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures.”

For sure Biden/Harris had our once-great nation “bound in shallows and in miseries” on the world stage.

It is time for the United States to fix this ugly world and we have a leader hell-bent on doing so. World Peace Forevercan be the center piece.

 BACKGROUND ON WORLD PEACE PROPOSALS

THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS: 

With technically-advanced machine guns, tanks, and chemical warfare, World War I was optimistically referred to as “The war to end all wars.”  January 1918, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson outlined an idea for an organization that would be charged with resolving conflicts before they exploded into bloodshed.  In 1919 the structure of The League of Nations was laid out in Paris and the Treaty of Versailles went into effect in January 1920 with 48 member countries. The U.S. Congress failed to ratify our membership in the League.  Between 1920 and World War II there were numerous opportunities to act, but it never did.  The League of Nations was abandoned during World War II.  The League was not necessarily a bad idea, but numerous times, when actions were required, European countries found it too difficult to put together an effective united front against an aggressor to include the rise of Germany.

THE UNITED NATIONS:

In June 1941 representatives from thirteen nations (the U.S. was not included) met in London and signed the Declaration of St. James’s Palace expressing a vision for postwar world order.  The next step was the Atlantic Conference in August 1941, at which President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill laid out a more detailed form of the alliance called The Atlantic Charter. The final step was the Yalta Conference, in February 1945 when Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin agreed on the establishment of the United Nations as well as the structure of the Security Council.   

Despite having endured for 80 years, generally speaking, the UN is a weak-intentioned, expensive, bureaucratic mass that is involved in everything and accomplishes very little.  Case in point, did the UN even bother to responded to the Russian 24th of February invasion of Ukraine?  Yes, on March 3rd they voted overwhelmingly for a resolution deploring Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and called for the immediate withdrawal of its forces.  Wow, that must have shaken Putin to his core.

The UN is an established international organization perfectly positioned to be a greater force for the greater good of the collective world.  But in its current condition, it is incapable of deterring or bringing to a close aggression anywhere in the world. We need to completely rethink this issue, right now while at “the flood”.

THE UN AND THE SECURITY COUNCIL TODAY: 

The UN’s number one priority has always been and continues to be, “to insure international peace and security.” How are they doing?

The Security Council consists of five permanent members, the U.S., China, Russia, France, and the UK (allies during WW II), and ten elected member nations.  The presidency of the Council rotates among the fifteen members, each serving for one month.  Is anyone surprised that Russia was president of the Security Council in February 2022 when they attacked Ukraine? But it gets worse. All important issues and initiatives in the UN pass through the Security Council for a vote of approval. To pass, there must be 9 of the 15 votes for approval and the nine must include all five of the permanent members.  Stated another way, any single permanent member can vote “no” and the issue is dead. With Russia and China as permanent members, nothing positive rarely passes.

Under the United Nations Charter, the principal function of the Security Council is to also “Ensure international peace and security.”

Given these clearly articulated responsibilities and authority, we can conclude that the UN in general and the Security Council, in particular, have been abject failures for eight decades. 

First of all, can you imagine a large international company CEO having fifteen Executive Vice Presidents, each allowed to lead for a month every fifteen months; thereby allowing each to bring his or her biases and priorities to the forefront? It’s at least stupid if not also insane.

CONCLUSIONS TO THIS POINT

The world is a tinder box ready to explode.

Neither the United Nations nor the Security Council  have not, can not and will never be able to take on its priority mission, “to ensue international peace and security.”

We need a new way to think about and then to accomplish continued peace and security for the whole world. President Trump can make this happen.

HOW PRESIDENT TRUMP SHOULD PROCEED

First, what not to do.  Do not turn this over to the State or Defense Departments; it will immediately have a staff of hundreds doing nothing productive. Do not get Congress involved yet.

The president should initially work this action within the White House with a small team set up in the National Security Advisor’s office.  Keep it close hold initially.

The way ahead is for President Trump to get a few national leaders on face time or teams meet. Begin with our long-serving allies through the Cold War; UK, France, Canada, Germany and Italy.

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TALKING POINTS TO EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR UNITED FOR WORLD PEACE, UWP.

Thank you for taking my call. As we speak, my people are sending a document to your offices which lays out the who, what, when, where, why and how to achieve and sustain world peace forever. My intent today is to talk you through the concept of operations and take your questions at the end.

Some facts bearing on the issue:

In the past year hundreds of thousands of military and civilian persons have been killed or wounded by warring factions.

For the past eighty years the United Nations has had as it number one priority mission to “insure international peace and security”. They have failed 100%.

The world is currently a powder keg in Europe, the Middle East and in Africa. We can and should end this.

I am NOT proposing we attempt to fix the UN; that is impossible with the one-vote veto available to Russia and China on the all-powerful Security Council.

What I am proposing is the creation of a new global organization absolutely and completely separate from the UN that will have as its only mission, continuous international peace and security. The mission, in a word, is deterrence. I will refer to the organization as United for World Peace, UPW.  I envision having at least 150 member nations.

The concept of operations is for every member nation to be prepared, at all times, to rapidly deploy their highly trained piece of the overall global deterrent force. For nation X their contribution might be a mechanized brigade with tanks, mechanized infantry, supporting field artillery and a support battalion.  For nation Y it could be tactical air.  For nation Z it could be naval forces or it could be special operations forces. For the 36 nations without a defense budget, there will be requirements for logisticians, medical personnel, police or provide a forward-based airfield that can support tac-air and cargo planes. For the U.S. the contribution could be its entire fleet of 900 military cargo aircraft to rapidly move forces to designated hot spots; a critical capability that no other nation can provide.  

There should be a small United for World Peace (UWP) headquarters led by a president elected by the member nations.  The staff will conduct daily operations by video with the Ambassadors from each nation who are routinely at their home-station. 

There will be a separate military headquarters with an experienced 4-star military officer nominated by the UWP president and approved by a majority vote of the member nations.

The military element will be referred to as the IDF.  Not to be confused with the Israeli Defense Force, the “D” for our organization stands for Deterrence.  This International Deterrence Force will have zero “defense” functions.  This force will be about continuous deterrence and massive rapidly deployable offensive capabilities when it becomes necessary to immediately overwhelm an aggressor nation or aggressor group.

The military staff will consist primarily of experienced operators who will lay out a vast number of potential aggressor contingencies that could possibly occur. Then they will tailor an IDF force from the coalition nations’ contributions that will, when deterrence fails, be trained to rapidly deploy to counter attack the aggressor with an overwhelming strike force.  The underlying concept for tailoring the force is, “never take a knife to a knife fight”. Always plan to overwhelm the enemy with a superior force.

Secondly, in the IDF headquarters, there will be intelligence experts pulling applicable intel from all the member nations and keeping it current for every region and every individual nation that may have a high potential for aggressor activities.

The IDF conditions will be as follows:

IDFCON 1:  Normal peacetime condition.  A completed deployment plan will be in place for every member nation.  Readiness standards will be clearly articulated and be enforced for every IDF element.

IDFCON 2:  The UWP president and IDF Commander, having identified a potential threat to a member nation, will tailor a force for deployment and place them on 24-hour alert.

IDFCON 3:  All personnel and equipment for the designated units will move to assembly areas.  Deployment aircraft will move to their first pick-up airfield. Forward deployment airfields will be manned and prepared for 24/7 operations.

IDFCON 4:  Deploy all designated IDF elements to the target area and prepare to initiate an overwhelming counteroffensive.

Let me be very clear at this point. Neither the UWP nor the IDF will necessarily be led by the United States. What I intend is for the U.S. to lead the formation of the organization and make the two headquarters functional.

Will this concept of a coalition of nations with a military mission actually work?  Yes, for example, as you know NATO was formed in 1949 with 12 members and successfully deterred the Soviet Union from its intended end state of world domination and the destruction of the U.S. until its collapse in 1991.

Can a coalition of nation rapidly deploy and launch a successful counter offensive. Yes, it has already been done. I want to refer you to the document that should be arriving at your location about now. Please study the part about the coalition action in 1990 and into 1991.

You will recall in 1990 Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi forces attacked, defeated and occupied Kuwait. In January 1991 a 39-nation coalition attacked and defeated Saddam Hussien’s vaunted “Mother of All Armies” in just six weeks of air and ground operations. The U.S.-led coalition of nations in a very short period of time deployed a massive air and mechanized army of about a half a million strong to conduct a counter offensive. The ground war lasted about 100 hours during which Iraq lost about 3,700 tanks, 70,000 soldiers taken prisoner and over 100,000 killed.

Funding would be by member nations for two small UWP and IDF headquarters. But, in reality your overall military budget could actually be reduced.  Formation of this organization could potentially reduce world-wide military spending by trillions of dollars per year. Member nations  do will not need to maintain a defensive force; that is what the IDF deterrence is for.

Most nations today have a full complement (air/ground/naval) force structure.  In reality, what each nation will need under this concept is to support only their element of the entire IDF.

The power in this concept of operations will be the inclusion of Article 5 borrowed from the NATO Treaty which declares that an attack on one member is an attack against all members. That is the ultimate deterrent.

With this coalition in being, potential aggressors will have to contemplate that on day-one of an attack they will face odds of 1 against potentially 150. 

With the UWP in place as Russia was deploying a massive invasion force to the Ukraine border in late 2021 and early 2022, the President of UWP and the Commander of IDF would have visited Putin and explain to him that if the first shot is fired, he would be, within 7 days, facing a massive counter offensive that would destroy his military and likely take down his government. Ukraine would not have happened; millions of casualties would have been avoided and Ukraine would not be faced with rebuilding its cities.

With the UWP in place Israel would not have been fighting invaders on four fronts for its very existence.

If UWP was in place, Rwanda-backed rebels would not now be killing Republic of Congo citizens in central west Africa. The origin of the current fighting can partly be traced back to the genocide in Rwanda in 1994 when about 800,000 Tutsis were slaughtered by ethnic Hutu extremists; 30 years of senseless killing.

What I have discussed to this point has to do with a conventional battlefield. But in the world today we must also be aware of the destruction that can be brought to bear with ciber attacks. Imagine the loss of life involved if, for example, the entire power grid of your country was taken down and could not be restored for months or years. Nations must expend continuous efforts internally to take down ciber attack capability or face the consequences of a counter ciber attack from the IDF.

Finally, there is significant discussion today about “a new world order”. It is within the art of the possible that the new world order could be world peace forever.

Thank you for listening, your questions please.

President Trump should within a few days quickly repeat this small-group discussion with Japan/South Korea/Australia/India and perhaps a couple Southeast Asian nations. Then another European non-Nato group, a Middle East group, Latin American nations and Africa.  By then the word will have leaked out.  To attempt to quiet the uninformed naysayers the President should speak to the nation with a formal address that will be picked up by the remainder of potential member nations.

Following that, President Trump should begin asking nations to commit to membership in United for World Peace and proceed to establish the two required headquarters. Make all that happen within a two -week period and build international momentum.  

WE HAVE BEEN THERE, DONE THAT

A coalition of nations can be rapidly formed to counter an aggressor. Here are the numbers associated with the 1990-91 Gulf War. it is worth going over the numbers a couple times to get a sense of the enormity of the air-lift and how quickly the nations molded into a far-superior offensive force.  

Coalition member nations: 39 countries, of which 28 contributed combat forces.

Force size: Approximately 670,000 troops from 28 countries, 425,000 of which were from the United States.

Coalition air component size: 2,250 combat aircraft, 1,800 of which were American.

Coalition airlift: 509,129 passengers and 594,730 tons of cargo carried.

Coalition sorties flown: 100,000+.

Aerial refueling: 15,434 sorties that dispensed 110.2 million gallons of fuel.

Number of dumb bombs dropped: 210,000.

Number of smart bombs dropped: 9,342.

30mm depleted uranium rounds fired by A-10 manned aircraft (tank-killers): 782,514.

Duration of air campaign before ground invasion: 39 days.

Iraqi tanks lost during the war: 3,700 out of 4,280 in inventory.

Number of U.S. Carrier Battle Groups on station: 6.

Coalition POWs taken during the war: 26.

Iraqi POWs taken during the war: 70,000+.

U.S. combat related deaths: 147

Iraqi military deaths: 100,000+.

Ground war duration: 100 hours.

This all happened between August and the following February. Beyond the magnitude of the war-fighting personnel and equipment, just think about the daily logistics of delivering food, water, millions of tons of ammunition being moved and handling 70,000 POWs all of it happening in the Saudi Arabian desert. Simply remarkable.

CONCLUSIONS

With the IDF in place, global defense spending could probably be reduced by trillion of dollars per year.  

There will no longer be a need for nations’ bilateral treaties for mutual defense. 

With world peace assurances in place, the next step could be a world without nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, or biological weapons.

The UN “peacekeeping force” budget for 2021 was $6.38 billion.  With active worldwide deterrence and an overwhelming rapidly-deployable counter-offensive force, peace will be the standard day-to-day condition.

This is also an opportunity to innovate when dealing with the possibility of World War III with China. Here is a plausible scenario that demonstrates the versatility and power of the UWP concept. 

 China continues to threaten Taiwan with aggressive air and naval operations. It is determined by the IDF Commander that the demonstrations are a rehearsal for an actual attack. President Biden once declared publicly that if attacked by China, the U.S. would provide military aid to Taiwan.  A naval showdown with China could become the U.S. worst nightmare.

 Recognizing that China’s Achilles heel is imported oil, about 11 million barrels per day, the IDF Commander could Inform China that a combined naval force from all IDF member nations is in route to the South China Sea to create an impenetrable blockade of all incoming gas and oil tankers. Additionally, missiles and aircraft capable of taking out the gas and oil pipelines from Russia will be immediately forward deployed.  This scenario could shut down China in a few weeks.  The UWP President will request China publicly sign a pledge to acknowledge that forevermore Taiwan will be considered an independent nation free of all ties to China and provocative military actions against Taiwan are forbidden. Deterrence in action in support of world peace. Deterrence in action; not a shot fired.

PROOF OF CONCEPT

One of the problems associated with a new idea is dealing with the naysayers, change and fear of the unknown. But with this initiative we have proof of concept, a rare advantage. 

With respect to the issue of deterrence, NATO vs the Soviet Union for decades is proof of concept.

The U.S. led counter offensive against Iraq in 1991-1992 is proof of concept with respect to the formation and rapid deployment of an overwhelming counter offensive force.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Mr. President, you are currently, “The leader of the free world” in name only.  Here is an opportunity to lead the world towards sustained world peace not for the sake of the United States but for the sake of the world.   Make it your number one, non-political priority. 

Author’s note:  I would not expect all of you reading this to agree with all of the details. But if you at least agree with the concept, please forward it to your Senators and Representative in Washington.  Perhaps someone with a national voice will take up the challenge.

Mister President, this will be your legacy, perhaps the greatest in U.S. history. Become the global peacemaker.

TAKING DOGE ONE STEP FURTHER ON A DUAL TRACK

From what we have seen so far, the new Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE appears to be concentrating on spending.  That’s good, they are reportedly uncovering some massive government waste, fraud and abuse of power.

What is “spending”?  Spending is the end state of the entire, huge budgeting process.  Determining the federal spending parameters begins with the development of the President’s Budget submitted to Congress every year in early February. Congress then begins a well-defined but normally almost completely and irresponsibly ignored specific timelines to determined what will be spent, when and by whom during the next fiscal year.  

While DOGE is into spending, we must also have an in-depth look at budgeting if DOGE is to be completely successful.

President Trump can accomplish both simultaneously, efficiently and effectively and thereby arrive at the desired end state.  Keep in mind that every successful strategic plan must begin at the end; that is, by defining the end state.  But if the president does not also launch a look into the entire Executive Branch budgeting piece, the overall plan will be only half-baked. 

GROUND TRUTH:

A mammoth, sprawling, uncontrollable, federal government currently numbering over 4 million employees plus hundreds of thousands of contract personnel was never the vision or intent of the Founding Fathers.  Organizations have a propensity to grow to a point of diminishing returns; cease to be efficient, effective, and/or no longer perform the functions for which they were created.  At that point, a large organization will tend to look inward and become self-perpetuating rather than value-added for the greater good.

Some or all of that applies today to the Departments and agencies in the Executive Branch of the federal government. This results in three major problems that desperately need to get fixed.

One, it costs hundreds of billions of dollars annually to maintain and sustain office space, salaries, health care and long-term retirement pay and benefit to the massive Executive Branch.

Second, and more importantly, the annual U.S. budget boils up out of this massive organization. Every government-funded program is maintained and sustained inside these bureaucracies.  These programs are this organization’s product.  General Motor’s product is vehicles; the Executive Branch’s product is taxpayer-funded programs.  The question is, what is the value added of those programs?  An in-depth review will undoubtedly find programs that have existed for decades, their original purpose no longer relevant; programs that sounded good at their inception but have failed in execution; programs to solve a problem that should have been the purview of state or local officials; programs initiated to solve a short-term problem but have lived on forever.  The list is long.  President Reagan summed up the problem with this statement, “Government is like a baby, an alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.”

Why specifically do all of the organizational elements in the Executive Branch exist? For the most part they are formed to support a law, a regulation and/or an internal rule or one sent down from Congress or the White House. There is an interesting measure of an administration’s regulatory activity; it’s called The Federal Register. it is a daily journal of federal government activity that includes presidential documents, proposed and final rules, and public notices. It is a common measure of an administration’s regulatory activity.

Some recent administrations’ Federal Registry activity: According to government data, the Federal Register hit an all-time high of 95,894 pages in 2016, during the last year of the Obama/Biden administration (the Affordable Care Act contains about 17,000 pages of regulations). The first year of the Trump administration, 2017, there were 61,950 pages, the lowest recorded page total since 2001. In Bidens last 12 months in the White House, his administration created 3,248 new “rules” and finished out the year by publishing 107,262 pages in the Federal Register.

We are a regulation nation; an administrative state and it must get cleaned up.

In his first days in office, President Trump has declared that for every new regulation federal agencies must delete ten existing regulations. Not good. There is a quote that sums up that directive, “For every complex problem, there is a simple solution and it is usually wrong.”  The point being, the process of deleting regulations needs to be a critical element in the bottom-up Executive Branch review wherein there will be direct and thoughtful linkage of regulations to organizations to budget to value added and then a thoughtful decision can be made as to whether the executing organization and regulation should go, stay or be altered.

HOW TO PROCEED WITH THE BOTTOM-UP PART OF DOGE

First recognize this will be a difficult process because we are talking about change, massive change, within each Executive Branch organization. We must recognize that for any large organization, especially one as large as the Executive Branch, change is very difficult. Fear of the unknown is a powerful human force, especially in government with an entrenched, layered bureaucracy that is stiff, stifling, and, in many respects, self-serving.

How does all this get accomplished? It will be a months-long tedious but critically important process. There are no viable shortcuts to re-thinking, re-designing, and re-structuring large organizations and making them be all they can and should be. 

Vice President Vance should lead this effort in concert with what Elon Musk and his team are doing on the spending issues. Vance should first set up a senior task force consisting of the deputies of all the departments, agencies, and commissions. They will be the change-agents and become the junkyard dogs of Washington.

Define the end state for this campaign. For example, the Vice President might say, “Over the next few months our task force will look inside every organizational element of the Executive Branch.  We will assess their mission (is it relevant today), their structure (too many or too few people), layering (is it OK or dysfunctional), can the organization integrate (communicate) vertically and horizontally efficiently and effectively on a day-to-day basis? Is the organization as a whole agile (able to deal with change as a matter of course) and is there overall value-added for the government and especially for the American taxpayer?”

The process begins in every named organization by putting together a very detailed organization chart. That’s the essential visual element for the task force and it provides an immediate sense of size, complexity, and layering.  Why the organization chart?  Because it allows the task force to begin the analysis and restructure at the bottom of the organization. Without the org chart the process will just not work effectively.

Using the Department of Agriculture as an example, there are 65 different organizational elements that come under the headings of departments, agencies, councils, institutes, programs, foundations, services, authorities, offices of, boards and facilities.  Inside them are departments, directorates, branches, sections, cells, and individual elements.  Every one of those becomes a “box” in the organization chart.  Each organizational box must list the name of the element, number of employees, and the grade of the leader, GS 10, 12, whatever.

Within the Department of Agriculture, for example, the Deputy Secretary, part of the VP’s senior task force, will form his/her own internal departmental task force. The Department Task Force’s first action will be to send out an internal memo to the leaders of every “box” to submit, in one week, “a no-more-than-two-page, font 12” report to the Deputy Secretary.  The report format should include, as a minimum these six elements:

First, a one or two-sentence mission statement that describes what it is that element collectively does; for example, responsible for writing, executing, and enforcing Department Regulation 135, Beef Export Program, and reporting results quarterly to ………

Keep in mind that there are undoubtedly tens of thousands of worthless reports written every year by an entrenched bureaucratic mass that lives on forever sucking up tax dollars, stifling initiative, and being a roadblock to progress.

Second, the report should describe the grade structure of all the employees in the box.

The Department task Force will look at the grade structure for each of the boxes in the organization chart.  Is it commensurate with the degree of complexity of the mission? Could two or more similar “boxes” be combined with fewer total people?

Third, describe a typical work week to include the number of meetings and amount of travel.  

This can reveal a lot about an organizational element and its leader.  Many meetings are just to fill up time, or are a daily social coffee clutch, or make the person in charge feel like he/she is actually “leading”.  Many are a colossal waste of time. If employees have time to attend too many meetings, they probably are not very busy to begin with. Is the travel critical to success, nice to have, or perhaps just to fill up the workweek? Travel is very expensive and too many times it is the recipients’ worst nightmare, “I’m from the federal government and I’m here to help.”

Fourth, what laws, rules and/or regulations guide that organization’s work? 

This is a critical element in the review.  Has this organization been acting out a scenario that is unnecessary or at least should better reside at the state or local level?

Fifth, a list, in single sentences, of major accomplishments in the past twelve months.

The task force will then determine if the accomplishments are in line with the mission or are just doing busy work?

Sixth and finally, a short statement of value-added. For example, without us the Department would not/could not do the following………

The Department Task Force will begin a detailed review of every input report. Their job is to ask, do we need Regulation 135 (Beef Export Program) any longer?  If so, could this be done with fewer people?  Could the same number of employees also be responsible for regulation 246 (Pork Export Program)? Do we need the report quarterly? And most importantly, what is the value-added of that organizational element to the overall Department’s mission? Was it formed long ago to solve a problem that no longer exists?  Is it in fact harmful?  Does anyone up the chain actually need the quarterly report or is it just a nice-to-know information?

By bringing together the three critical elements (the guiding law/regulation/rule, the number of people involved and the value added), the Department team then comes to the conclusion that there are not sufficient reasons to justify keeping that “box”.

Two things just happened. One, part of the Executive Branche’s annual budget just got cut out.  Multiply that equation by perhaps thousands of similar actions and the President’s budget will be reduced by billions of dollars.  Secondly, when the box goes away, so does the regulation/rule that caused it to exist. This reduces the regulation nation in a logical way.

Additionally, this type review and action will fly under the radar and not create Democrat or radical-left media hysteria about MAGA-reductions.

WHAT CAN GO WRONG?

Some of the Vice President’s senior task force may not be completely on board.  Agriculture Department Deputy Secretary to Vice President Vance, “I’ve taken a look at the 100,000 end-strength in the Department of Agriculture and believe it is about right.”  That person must be immediately replaced; they are part of the problem.  

Some of the reports from the “boxes” to the Department task force will not be two pages in length.  The box leader will want to make an impression and he/she will send in a 15-page tome.  The senior task force leader must immediately scribble a note on the front page, “What is it you don’t understand about 2-page limit.  Back on my desk by close of business.”

The point being, the Vice President and every leader on the senior task force must send a hard message about change; get with the program or be immediately replaced. 

This process, will consume much of VP Vance’s time for a few months. He should routinely go to all the Departments and be satisfied they completely understand that their review of the input from the bottom-up is all about policy, practices, process, grade structure commensurate with overall responsibility, span of control, layering, and value-added. Are they tough enough, too tough, thorough enough, on the right track, or being overly protective of the status quo?  

 By frequently visiting the subordinate task forces, VP Vance will also be able to pick up strong points and failures and pass them along to other Departments as best/worst practices. 

The leaders of the Executive Departments along with the VP’s senior task force members will conduct a monthly in-progress-review for President Trump where they will lay out their findings to date and get marching-orders for continued work.

WHY DO ALL THIS WORK?

 One the most common attempts at downsizing, in my experience used numerous times over the past decades, have been to declare a hiring freeze and/ or order an across-the-board, for example, ten percent personnel cut, neither of which make any sense nor achieve any lasting positive results. 

Second, what I have described above has never been done before.  We have just allowed the Executive Branch to grow without ever undertaking a necessary pruning process

CONCLUSIONS

Once the task force has worked its way up from the bottom, looking at every element, their individual mission, and value added, then and only then will they be capable of looking back and seeing how many subordinate elements are off track, irrelevant, unnecessary or even counterproductive.  They will then be capable of restructuring, re-aligning, re-tasking, reorganizing the subordinate elements to create an organization that is more focused, aligned, responsive, innovative, agile, and rid of pockets of resistance.

Having reached the top of the organization chart it is possible the Vice President’s senior task force could conclude that an entire department’s continued existence should be questioned.  A prime example is the Department of Education.  We know that education in America is a national disgrace and not getting better in spite of (or because of) the 4,400 employees and a 2024 budget of $79 billion; an $11 billion increase over 2023.

The task forces must be especially mindful of the phrase, “we provide oversight.”That is a red flashing light that an organization does not, in and of itself, produce anything of value. They simply exist to grade papers, expand their purview, inhibit progress and expend tax dollars. 

During the process, it is important to not lose sight of the two-fold objectives.  First, the objective is NOT to reach some specific lower end-strength number of federal employees.  The objective is to rid the government of boxes” in the organization charts that have no valueadded, they just exist because they have always been there.  The end state is an organization that is leaner, more focused, more efficient, more effective, and agile. The second objective is to end up with an organization that has a much smaller and more realistic annual budget.

When completed, many positions, perhaps thousands of them, will be eliminated. It will then take a couple years of shuffling the deck by the Office of Personnel Management to get folks reassigned or retired, but it is within the art of the possible and worth the effort. 

There is also a states’ rights issues in all of this.  As the federal government grows, a natural outcome is that they over-reach into areas that are better and more effectively handled at the local and state levels.  Federal over-reach tends to result in a one-size-fits-all approach to problem-solving and creates a stifling regulation-nation.

BOTTOM LINE:

Getting spending and hence debt under control will resonate with Americans and fit perfectly with the Trump movement for necessary governmental change.

We need to accomplish a number of really big things in order to move towards a balanced budget and away from continuously approving another debt-limit increase.

This dual VP Vance/Elon Musk DOGE undertaking is one of the keys to success and is clearly within the art of the possible. Without it, DOGE will be incomplete.

President Reagan got it right when he reminded us that:

“Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.”

“Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”

“Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.”

Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of two books, Vision to Execution and Fix the Systems, Transform America as well as the author of a blog, WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.

UNIVERSAL SERVICE FOR AMERICA (USA)

BACKGROUND:

Compulsory national service for all 18-year-old Americans is a program that has never existed in our nation.  It has the potential to transform America in a very positive way.

THE DRAFT:

Drafting U.S. men in times of national emergencies has been a tool since the colonies drafted them to fill the ranks of their militias to fight in the Revolutionary War.  The latest draft was in effect from pre-World War II until discontinued in 1973.

THE SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM:

The Selective Service System is run by an agency in the Executive Branch of the federal government. Selective Service is responsible for registration and running a draft in times of national emergency.  Currently, men aged 18-25 who are U.S. citizens or are immigrants living in the U.S. are required to register with the Selective Service System within 30 days of turning 18.  Immigrants must register within 30 days of arriving in the U.S. Those who fail to register will not be eligible for federal student aid, federal job training, or a federal job and may be prosecuted and face a fine of up to $250,000 and/or jail time of up to five years.

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON SERVICE:

Since the dissolution of the draft in 1973 there have been sporadic conversations about a compulsory national service program for all young adults.  As part of the FY 2017 Defense Authorization Act, President Trump and the Congress established a National Commission on Military, National and Public Service.  Their specific mission was to accomplish two things:  Conduct a review of the military selective service process and consider methods to increase participation in military, national and public service in order to address national security and other public service needs of the nation.

After two and a half years of public engagement, the Commission issued its final report in March 2020, containing its findings and recommendations which include:

One, requiring women to register with the Selective Service System at age 18. 

Two, increasing military outreach, particularly to those areas with a low-propensity to join the armed forces.

Three, expanding educational opportunities during military service and developing strategies to recruit and retain in high-demand occupations.

Four, expanding civic educational programs in schools.

Five, significantly increasing non-military service opportunities in order to create, “an expectation of service” by 2031.

The Commission’s report, entitled Inspire to Serve, explains a vision that, “…. every individual will be exposed to voluntary service opportunities throughout their lifetime, beginning with young people….”.  They also repeatedly commented on the need to create an American culture of service by 2031.  What was most important about the report was what they did not say.  Two things:

One, they completely failed to recognize the elephant in the room, that is, do we need compulsory national service for everyone 18-years old? 

Two, while they frequently emphasized the importance of creating a national culture of service, they provided zero insights into how that was going to become possible. 

The final Commission’s hearings were held by the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 11, 2021, where their recommendations appeared to be well received by Senators of both parties. But, not surprising, there was zero action on this important issue during the Biden/Harris administration.

On 5 November, 2024, 77 million American voters proclaimed loud and clear, “we want change; lots of change.” In the first days of his administration, President Trump demonstrated that every aspect of American life is under consideration for change. He and VP Vance are the change agents. 

There is a scene in Shakespear’s Julius Ceasar that points the way forward on the subject of a Universal Service program for America.

There is a commonly-used quote that is applicable. “There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.”  

Shakespear goes on to explain eloquently in more detail what he meant: “On such a full sea are we now afloat and we must take the current when it serves or lose our ventures. Power is a force that ebbs and flows in time and one must go with the flow. Waiting only allows the power to pass its crest and begin to ebb. If the opportunity is missed, you will find yourself stranded in miserable shallows.” Is that not exactly where our nation is today?

There is so much wisdom in Shakespeare’s words; Mr. President, over to you for action.

ABOUT A CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS:

A concept of operations is a good place to begin a long-range strategic planning process.  Its purpose is to tell the story by first defining the problem to be solved, providing a vision of the end-state, that is, what we believe can be accomplished, and finally, filling in some of the blanks by describing the who, what, when, where, why and how of the program.  When completed the concept of operations can become a public affairs tool, a sales pitch and in this case, it can become legislation.  

DEFINING THE PROBLEMS:

 Begin with these two questions: Are there any identifiable problems that need to be solved among our young Americans? Yes.

Are there existing programs that specifically address these problems? No and not completely.  A wise person once said, “If you cannot define the problem, there is no solution.”

There are six identifiable youth-related issues that will continue to plague this nation far into the future unless bold steps are taken to fix them.

One, GANGS

The FBI reports, “there are some 33,000 violent street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs with about 1.4 million members criminally active in the U.S. today. Many are sophisticated and well organized; all use violence to control neighborhoods and boost their illegal money-making activities, which include robbery, drug and gun trafficking, prostitution, human trafficking, and fraud.”  Youth gangs are the training ground for a life of crime. 

The average number of members per gang is reportedly 42.  About half of all homicides in the U.S. are gang-related.  The Justice Department reports that, “The average age of gang members arrested in the U.S. is 17 or 18.”  This information, in and of itself, is sufficient justification for a mandatory youth program in America.  We need to take these young adults off the streets and introduce them to a different way of life.

Two, DROP-OUTS AND ILLITERACY:

 According to the National Center for Education Statistics, in 2022, 2.1 million U.S. students dropped out of school; that is on average over 11,000 students every school day. Statistically, 90% of them will end up on welfare at some point and 68% of all males in prison do not have a high school diploma.

The National Assessment for Educational Progress, NAEP, is the largest continuing and nationally representative assessment of what U.S. students know and can do in various subjects. Based on its decades of measuring and reporting it is referred to as “the Nation’s Report Card.”  NAEP is the gold standard for measuring what U.S. students know and can do in math, reading, writing, science, U.S. history, and civics. While they continuously publish reams of data, NAEP’s bottom line says it all, “An education system in which more than half of students entering 9th grade either drop out or graduate incapable of further education or satisfactorily performing in the private sector or the military is unsatisfactory.” That aptly defines where our, about 4.4 million, 18-years old Americans are with respect to academic excellence or the lack thereof.

Three, YOUTH OBESITY:

Obesity is a common, serious and costly disease. In the early 1960s, roughly 13% of Americans were considered obese by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. Recent figures suggest that a current national obesity rate is closer to 43%.

In addition, nearly 10% of all Americans were morbidly obese during the 2017-2018 survey,

compared to less than 1% in 1960-1962. Childhood obesity rates tripled from 5% in the early 1970s to more than 19% by March 2020.

In a Universal Service program, mandatory participation in daily exercise and counseling on healthy habits can help to establish a healthier future America. 

Four, CULTURE:

Culture is a powerful and pervasive force in every organization; it is an organization’s personality. It can be described as caring, hateful, fast, energetic, visionary, risk-taking, vengeful, etc. etc.  Right now, America, when viewed as an organization, is drowning in a culture of hate and blame which destroys any sense of unity and cooperation.  A year of character development can change young adults and henceforth, transform America.

Five, RACE:

There is no way to explicitly measure the state of race relations in the United States, but they are at least not what they should be.  What we do know is that babies are not born bigoted, disrespecting or hateful.  While growing up they learn it at home, in school, on the playground and on the streets. A Universal Service program’s character development along with integrated team work every day will enhance the understanding and cooperation among all races represented.  The U.S. military has successfully practiced this solution for decades.

Six, WELFARE:

 It is a fact that the more education one completes, the less likely they are to be on welfare. The government Office of Human Services Policy, has reported that in 2019, 99.1 million Americans were participating in at least one of the more popular programs such as medicaid, food stamps, subsidized lunches, public housing, unemployment and/or some sort of direct cash assistance. Universal Service for America will provide young men and women the opportunity to be better prepared to hold good jobs and stay off welfare.

Given that background, the question before us is, should we have Universal Service for America?

In consideration of these six problem areas (gangs, drop-outs, obesity, culture, race and welfare), the better question is, are these problems in the process of being solved with or by other national programs?  I believe the answer is an unequivocable NO.  Universal Service for America, or as it may become known as, the U.S.A. Program, can be a transformational undertaking and is therefore worth the effort to make it happen. It can become a rite of passage for all Americans. 

EXISTING NATIONAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS:

There are national service organizations in existence, such as AmeriCorps, Youth Build, Senior Corps and the Peace Corps. What they have in common is that they are relatively small in size and they are 100% voluntary.  One of the most enduring government youth programs has been Job Corps, a free residential education and job training program for young adults, aged 16-24, run by the Department of Labor.  Let me provide some revelations about Job Corps in order to make a couple important points.

From July 2016 to June 2017, Job Corps reported 3,673 safety and security incidents among the 79,000 enrollees (drugs, assault, alcohol, security breach, serious injury) according to the General Accounting Office analysis.  Other headlines over the years include, “Job Corps is one of the most wasteful, least effective programs in the federal government.” “Congress spends billions on ineffective job-training programs.” “Job Corps, a recipe for waste, fraud and failure.” “The Federal Job Corps training program is a flop.” “The government has taken on a role for which it was never intended, pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into a broken web of job training.”

The point to be made here is that the federal government has a very long history of attempting to build organizations and run them effectively and efficiently.  Their success rate is about zero.  If we are to move forward with legislation for Universal Service for America, it must NOT be organized, over-regulated and operated by government officials and bureaucrats.

HOW SHOULD UNIVERSAL SERVICE for AMERICA, BE ORGANIZED AND FUNDED? 

To avoid the pit-falls of the decades-old Job Corps program, Universal Service for America should be organized as a non-profit 501-C3 national non-governmental organization, NGO.  An NGO is a non-profit, citizen-based undertaking that functions independently of the government.  NGOs are organized on local, national and international levels to serve specific social or political purposes.  Despite their independence from the government, many NGOs receive funding from local, state, and federal governments. 

There are about 1.5 million NGOs operating in the U.S. Widely known examples are Doctors Without Borders and the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP).  The federal government should fund salaries, housing, meals, transportation and medical services for Universal Service for America.

OPERATIONAL UNDERPINNINGS:

For Universal Service for America to be successful it must be based on and encompass, as a minimum, the following nineteen resolutions:

  1. At age 17 all U.S. citizens and non-naturalized immigrants must register for Universal Service for America with the existing Selective Service System. Congress should amend the Selective Service System Act with two changes:

Amend the enrollment age from 18 to 17.  This will provide Universal Service for America staff with a valid database of potential participants a year in advance of their reporting for duty at age 18.

Currently the law says that, “Failure to register with the Selective Service is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment.”

The law should be amended to read:  All American citizens must register with the Selective Service within 30 days after their 17th birthday. Immigrants residing in the United States who are 17 through 25 years of age must registerwithin 30 days of arrival in the U.S. Those who have not done so by their 18th birthday are subject to imprisonment for five years.  If, after one year in prison, they register with the Selective Service and report to the next available Universal Service for America program, the remainder of the 5-year sentence will be forgiven. 

2. Attendance is mandatory for all high school graduates who are 18 years old plus all 18-year-old non-graduates.  Exceptions include: women who are pregnant or have a child; individuals who are physically or mentally impaired; and those who join the military immediately after high school graduation. Individuals who are head-of-households may apply for an exemption. 

3. Universal Service for America will be 12-months in duration beginning June of each year. This needs some discussion:

Unlike AmeriCorps, YouthBuild and Job Corps that may have just a few thousand up to 75,000 enrollees, Universal Service for America will have about four million enrollees on a continuous basis. That is almost twice the size of the entire U.S. military, active duty, Guard and Reserve combined. 

Compulsory service for all 18-year-old Americans and immigrants will be an enormous undertaking.  For a 2-year program, following the first-year enrollment of 4 million people, all succeeding years would have about 8 million continuously in residence.  For example, a small city, population 50,000, would have about 1,600 participants in residence at all times.  Conclusion: 2-year program may be too large to run efficiently and effectively.

If it is a 12-month program, that begs the question: What impact will it have on all of our colleges and universities which will, the first year of the program, be without an entire incoming freshman class? There are three possible solutions to this problem:

The first is exempt compulsory service for all high school graduates who will be enrolled as full-time college students by the fall semester after high school graduation.  There are enormous downsides to this alternative: It defeats the overall intent and purpose of the program, which is to create a culture of service for all Americans; many students have no business going to college, but may use college enrollment simply as a way to dodge the compulsory service; and it would create an unhealthy division in America for all times, meaning those who did and those who didn’t “serve”.  It will defeat the advantages resulting from “rite of passage”

A second alternative is to require all college students to attend at least two, and perhaps three or four summer sessions of Universal Service for America; the first immediately following high school graduation.  There are potential downsides for this alternative:  Every June there will be (in round numbers) about 4 million new candidates for Universal Service for America; about 2.5 million will be college bound in September and 1.5 million will begin their full year of service. 

If the college students are to complete their service commitment by attending only summer sessions, after the first year of the service program there will be an additional surge of 2.5 million (those having just finished one year of college), 6.5 million total for the second summer; then a summer surge to 8 million the third June and to 10.5 million for the 4th June and 10.5 million every summer thereafter.

The logistics associated with those summer surge numbers would be staggering to begin with and creating these summer surges will likely negatively impact the overall quality of the program. 

The third alternative is for the federal government to create a one-time bailout fund for colleges and universities to offset the no-freshman-class situation that will occur the first, and only, year of Universal Service for America.

(Continuing with the program’s operational underpinnings:)

4. After 6 months in the program, anyone who is qualified to do so may enlist in the U.S. military.

5. All attendees will be provided with a photo identification card with personal description information, a Universal Service for America ID number and expiration date.  The ID will enable free local public transportation while in the program. In conjunction with the Selective Service, each states’ DMV facilities will produce and issue the ID cards.

6. Everyone will be stationed at a location removed from their home of record and will not be stationed with others from their home community.  

7. Men and women participants will not cohabitate.

8. The majority will be stationed in urban areas.

9. Every full-time attendee will be authorized vacation days over religious holidays and during July or August.

10. Lodging, meals, uniforms, transportation and medical care will be provided.  Each attendee will receive a stipend of $500 per month.

11. Uniforms will consist of dark blue pants/shorts, white shirts and a red hat.  Uniforms will include a name tag, a Universal Service for America logo, which will include the American flag.

     12.Everyone will participate in physical training five days per week.

    13. Everyone will abide by the Universal Service for America Code of Conduct.

    14. No one in the program is exempt from any local, state or federal laws. Universal Service for America will not provide legal counsel to attendees when apprehended for violations of the law.

    15. Transgender individuals will abide by local, state and federal rules in force for where they reside during their term of service.

    16. Mandatory unannounced drug testing will be the norm.

    17. All will participate in leader training by being team leaders or higher as they move through the program.

    18. This should be a no-frills experience for each participant consisting of long work days, community service on the weekends, and basic accommodations. 

    19.There will be two Universal Service for America websites: One to keep the general public apprised of every aspect of the program; and the second will be an internal site available to leaders and staff.  Innovation has been the lifeblood of this nation since its inception; best-practices will be templated and shared. Additionally, the internal site can be used to clarify program policies and procedures.

    PARTICIPATION NUMBERS:

    For a 12-month, all-18-year-old program:  Using 2020 data, it is possible to forecast the approximate number of participants if Universal Service for America could begin operations within the next few years; 3.7 million 18-year-old high school graduates, plus 300,000 18-year-old non-graduates and some, yet to be determined, number of 18-year-old non-citizens living in the U.S.

    A TYPICAL DAY:

     The intent of the schedule is to address the problems associated with gangs, dropouts, illiteracy, obesity, culture, race relations and welfare. And most importantly, to build a culture of service to society.  The days will be tailored to individual needs with the objective of transforming lives and thereby giving them a greater chance at a successful life.

    MORNING SCHEDULE:

    Physical training

    Gather in a classroom setting, in groups of about 25, with a volunteer instructor, and discuss elements of the Character Development curriculum which I will get to in a few minutes. This period every day is priority one.

    For the remainder of the morning, based on arrangements with local schools, those who have not graduated from high school, could, attend virtual classes and gain credits towards receiving a high school diploma.

    Through arrangements with local Community Colleges, those participants interested in some type of technical training could take morning classes. 

    Those seriously deficient in reading, writing and math skills could attend remedial morning classes.

    Have an “open” period each morning for guest speakers, leadership training, lessons on U.S. history and civics; whatever subjects enhance the overall program.

    AFTERNOON SCHEDULE:

    Generally, this will be the time for community service.  There are so many ways to help out and become visible to the public in positive ways, for example:

    Clean parks and playgrounds, volunteer at a museum, assist at a walk-a-thon or community run, deliver food to the homebound, work at a food bank, take care of animals at a shelter, tutor students who have fallen behind in their studies, walk kids home from school, donate blood, help kids with their homework, offer free music lessons, coach a youth sports team, teach adults internet skills, teach CPR, assist immigrants with conversational English, chaperone a field trip, help out at a community center, volunteer as a lifeguard, be a crossing guard, do social media for a local nonprofit, help set up a community event, organize a clothing drive, adopt a highway and clean it, participate in musical performances at nursing homes, deliver groceries to the elderly, write letters for a senior citizen, lead an exercise program, sponsor an animal at the zoo, work for a charity like Habitat for Humanity, volunteer at a fire station, teach self-defense, paint over graffiti, work with special-needs kids; there is no end to this list.

    CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT

    Values are key drivers in our lives.  Our values motivate us, determine what we strive to become in both life and in the work place, determine how well we will fit into an organization.  Values are drivers in our decision making and set out moral compass.  Character Development is value development; here are the building blocks:

    Five days per week, following breakfast, participants will assemble, recite the Pledge of Allegiance and then participate in a character development class. 

    The Character Curriculum will be, ACCOUNTABILITY, CITIZENSHIP, COMMITMENT, COMPASSION, COURAGE OF CONVICTIONS, COURTESY, CONFIDENCE, HEALTHY HABITS, HONESTY, HONOR, HUMILITY, INTEGRITY, JUDGMENT, LEADERSHIP, MORALITY, PERSEVERANCE, PUNCTUALITY, RESPECT, RESPONSIBILITY, SELF-RESPECT, SELFLESS SERVICE, SPORTSMANSHIP AND TRUST.

    Just imagine the impact this can have with four million young adults having a substantive discussion about one of the subjects in the Character Curriculum five days a week and then adjourning to live/be/do/demonstrate those values on a daily basis.  It is a powerful initiative and will displace our current culture of hate and blame.

    GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR USA: 

    For this Non-Governmental Organization, the federal government will be responsible for financing the bulk of operational costs, including salaries, housing, food, transportation and medical services.

    The states will use their Division of Motor Vehicles facilities to produce and issue Universal Service for America ID cards for each 17-year-old as they register with the Selective Service.  

    Local officials will provide free-of-charge public transportation.  They will also become points of contact for program officials to coordinate the use of participants to fulfill community service tasks.

    LEADERS IN THE FIELD:

    There is and always will be a perfect source of men and women to become qualified leaders and staff for the program. Annually the Defense Department retires thousands of men and women who have just finished 20-30 years of service, are looking for a second career and all have four things in common.  One, they are proven leaders.  two, they have years of experience teaching and training.  Three, they understand standards and have spent two or three decades living up to them.  Four, and perhaps most importantly, they have served in a totally integrated inter-racial environment with an overarching value base of accountability, respect and trust.  What more could one ask for in a person to lead and mentor these young adults?

    OPERATIONAL LOCATIONS

    It will not be practical to run the program with individual participants scattered across sparsely populated rural areas.  This will, by necessity, be a program where they are housed and operate in urban areas with population densities of at least 50,000.  The total U.S. population living in areas with at least 50,000 density is about 250 million.  Doing the math, there are about 5,000 urban segments, each with a population of about 50,000.  To accommodate all 4 million participants June through the following May would require housing nearly 800 participants per 50,000-population segment. A city of 200,000 would need to house 3,200 (800 x 4) etc. across the U.S. urban landscape. 

    UNIVERSAL SERVICE FOR AMERICA HEADQUARTERS’ OPERATIONAL CONCEPT

    Centralized planning with emphasis on maximum decentralized execution is a must.  The federal government is infamous for getting it backwards. When they attempt to run an operation, invariably they will, through thousands of pages of regulations, create a top-heavy bureaucratic mass attempting to micromanage all aspects of an operation.  And, in most cases they fail.  Without decentralized decision making and execution, innovation and operational flexibility will be unachievable.

    Centralized planning by the CEO, the planning staff and Board of Directors will prescribe policy and articulate achievable standards.

    LAUNCH THIS OPERATION WITH A PHASED PLAN

    In long-range strategic planning, phasing the operation is an imperative.  Simply put, at the front end you don’t know what you don’t know. As you move forward in time, key data will come to light and can then be properly assimilated into the total equation. 

    Phase 1, If this was a military operation this step would be called Shaping the Battlespace. For this program to succeed we need a strong, robust, multi-faceted Public Relations Campaign to generally enlighten everyone and to convince the general population that this is worth the effort, worth the investment in tax-payer money and will make our nation better and stronger than it can otherwise become. We must recognize that mandatory participation is potentially a tough sell.

    The intent is to get a lot of traction with the White House, Congress, Governors, local officials, the general public and media. Also in phase 1, find a pro bono CEO for this program.  The first order of business will be to pull together a pro bono Board of Directors, composed of movers-and-shakers to find financing for a national Public Relations Campaign.

    Phase 2, the CEO and his/her Board of Directors should push for Universal Service for America Non-Governmental Organization, NGO, funding to be included in the President’s budget and that it is looked on favorable by the Congress during the budget process.  

    Phase 3, the first-year funding will be modest in that it may be prudent to begin the programs with a pilot program.

    It would be very difficult to begin this operation with a full complement of young adult participants (about 4 million) on day one and a fully-staffed and trained national organization to run it.  Therefore, the first-year funding should accommodate a pilot program with about 1,000 volunteer participants in each state.

    Also, in Phase 3 the CEO will give the states a heads-up that, if passed by Congress, the law will require the states’ DMV facilities to be prepared to coordinate with the Selective Services System and register prospective attendees

    Phase 4, the President signs the bill which will provide pilot-program funding for Universal Service for America as a Non-Governmental Organization.

    Upon passage of the Univer Service for “America Act the CEO will hire a staff to complete the phased plan.  There will be hundreds of issues to work on, for example: develop an organization chart; hire and train leaders and staff; logistics for housing and feeding attendees; initial registration to get the program started; develop a national database of those who register as a 17-year-old; develop a recruiting and training program for volunteers; liaise with state and local authorities; construct plans for Character Development; write a Code of Conduct; determine pay scales for permanent and temporary hires, etc.

    The planning staff must also deal with the subject of discipline, a very delicate and important issue.  Inevitably, established rules and standards will be violated. The planners must define in detail who will have disciplinary authority and what the punishments will be for various categories of infractions.  Additionally, the headquarters staff must have a robust Inspector General Directorate to deal with complaints, potentially fraudulent activities, and any other activities that may call into question the integrity of the organization. 

    Phase 5 will begin in June, bringing 18-year-old volunteers into the program in each state. 

    VOLUNTEERS:

    Where do the volunteers come from to teach the Character Development curriculum?  There are about 70 million Baby Boomers currently retiring at a rate of about 10,000 per day and many are looking for something interesting, meaningful, and challenging to do in retirement.  Additionally, many local organizations, (country clubs, churches, charitable organizations, etc.) will be willing to sign up for a number of volunteer positions and keep them filled on a permanent basis.

    COMMUNITY INTERACTION:

    The nation needs to buy in to the idea of compulsory national service. They need to meet these young people, see them volunteering and working in teams for the betterment of the community. Therefore, a key to success will be the extent to which the participants can be temporarily joined up with businessmen and women, civil servants, first responders, and every part of what is going on in the community every day.   Arrange for participants to walk the beat with a law enforcement officer, spend a night in jail, see what goes on in the backroom of a supermarket, ride along when a fire truck is called out, spend some nights in a hospital emergency room and be a part of every community group doing volunteer work.  Participants need to be visible, see the good, the bad, and the ugly America and expand their horizons by seeing and doing new and different things every day. 

    A logical and valuable extension of this interaction is to institute, in every community, a mentoring program wherein leaders in all walks of life can personally, one-on-one interact with one or more of the participants over the year and by extension, into the future.  Mentoring can be a life-changing event for both. 

    VISION:

    All planning should begin at the end with a clear vision of the end-state. This first step is a must-do because there is truth in the old saying, “If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there.”

    The vision for Universal Service for America is to set in motion, through positive training and mentoring of all the nation’s 18-year-old young adults, a process that will mitigate the problems associated with gangs, dropouts, illiteracy, obesity, race, culture and welfare. Over a period of years Universal Service for America will transform this country into a better, safer and more prosperous place for everyone. 

    Vision is WHERE we need to go with this vital and important program.  

    MISSION:

    Once in place, there needs to be an overarching clear and brief statement defining what it is the organization is to focus on and accomplish every day.  For example, the U.S. Army’s mission is to prepare to fight and win the nation’s wars; clarity and brevity. 

    The Universal Service for America mission is to annually engage all 18-year-old Americans in a program that will enhance their education, build character, strengthen their self-determination and set in motion a lifelong appreciation for community service, all while internalizing and learning to live in a culture of accountability, trust and respect. 

    The mission is WHAT Universal Service for America needs to engage in each day.  

    THE CEO

    The position should be filled by an American patriot who is an influential and respected voice on cultural, political, and educational issues; preferably someone who has held positions of great importance in America to include perhaps an Executive Branch department head for a previous president. He/she should be a familiar voice for traditional American values.

    CONCLUSIONS

    It is within the art of the possible for Universal Service for America to become a valuable national recruiting resource. The military can now be more focused on a single group of 18-year-old Americans.  Local businesses may find a beneficial fit with some of the participants and offer them positions at the end of their national service obligation.  Technical businesses may look at the training the participants are engaged in at the community colleges to find prospective hires. The federal and state civilian work forces are constantly in need of an infusion of young talent, etc. 

    The percentage of the U.S. population which has benefited from compulsory service will grow every year and become transformational and drastically reduce the severity of the problems we are faced with today; gangs, dropouts, illiteracy, obesity, culture of blame and hate, race relations and welfare.

    This campaign with its character development, daily emphasis on values and teamwork, participants living and working in a culture of accountability, trust and respect can ultimately change how a nation thinks and acts, from the bottom up, for generations to come. 

    THE POWER OF THE CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT:

    Discussions with every participant each day will result in the following:

    As participants learn more about a life of accountability, they will be less likely to resort to hatred and blame.

    Participants who are steeped in commitment, confidence, perseverance, punctuality and responsibility do not skip classes or work schedules, do not fall behind or drop out and are more likely to pursue additional education, get a job and stay off welfare. 

    Participants who are deeply rooted in trust and respect will rally against bullying and are unlikely to become racially bigoted adults.  And they will believe, “They will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”  MLK

    Participants who accept being compassionate, courteous, honorable, and demonstrate the courage of their convictions, will not return home to their street gangs.

    Participants who accept honesty, morality and integrity as their guiding light are more likely to become life-long upstanding citizens.

    Participants who understand, live and accept a life of selfless service are unlikely to become self-serving adults.

    Participants who gain an understanding that there is a lot they don’t yet know and even part of what they believe might be incorrect, will have the quality of humility

    Participants who gain an understanding of self-respect will recognize that they are now better than they used to be and can be counted on in times of temptation because they are morally dependable. 

    With this value base, graduates of Universal Service for America are more likely to exercise good judgment and become good-to-great leaders.

    Universal Service for America will be expensive but there is a huge difference between an expense and an investment. 

    Amtrak is a good example of a tax-payer funded government-run expense.  Over fifty years ago, President Nixon signed the Rail Passenger Service Act creating the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, later known as Amtrak, to take over intercity passenger rail obligations. Amtrak has lost money every year requiring a federal subsidy.  In 2019 it was $1.9 billion in the red. As if that is not enough, the government Covid relief packages in 2020 provided $2 billion dollars to Amtrak.  Additionally, the infrastructure bill passed by the Senate in August, 2021 contains $66 billion for intercity rail. That, Mr. and Mrs. taxpayer, is a government expense.

    Universal Service for America, on the other hand, should not be categorized as a government expense; it is an investment in the future of our great nation.  Yes, it will be expensive but the pay-back is incalculable.  Go back and review the problems associated with young Americans today and then ask yourself if those problems could be even partially eliminated, would it be worth the investment?  The offset for U.S.A. program operational costs will be more Americans employed and paying taxes and fewer on welfare and in jail.

    Additional take-aways from this subparagraph on expense vs. investment: 1) The government must never take over the program and attempt to run it.  If that happens the program will fail from being ineffective, inefficient and lacking in ingenuity; and 2) The Congress must never be allowed to insert its partisan influence into the program’s curriculum via the annual appropriation to the NGO. If they do, the program’s integrity will be lost. 

    A PARTING THOUGHT:

    As we consider this legislation there is value in looking at the Israeli program of mandatory military service for all men and women. Four things that stand out are:

    One, mandatory military service has become a rite of passage for all Israeli citizens.  The U.S.A.  Program can become that for all Americans.

    Two, the army serves as Israel’s melting pot. Participants from every background are blended together for better understanding, appreciation and tolerance of each other.  The U.S.A. Program can do that for the United States.

    Three, women have equal status. and equal responsibilities.  The U.S.A. Program can promote and advance that in our nation.

    Four, service in Israel’s defense force is viewed as a precursor to the nation’s economy which has grown faster than any other developed country in the past 25 years. The parallel is that these young people learn how to solve problems, work with diverse groups of people and build networks. The U.S.A. Program can do that in the United States and easily offset the program’s investment dollars.

    What comes to mind is a photo I recently saw of five young women, probably in their late teens, casually dressed, smiling and obviously having a delightful conversation as young ladies are want to do.  It is the type of photo that might have been taken in any other nation but not this photo; these were Israeli women because each had with them an M16 military rifle. They were holding the weapons casually, safely, expertly and with obvious confidence as if it was a purse or backpack.  What came to mind was that these young adults were probably already steeped in accountability (for themselves, defense of family, teammates and country), citizenship, commitment, courage of convictions, confidence, honesty, honor, integrity, morality, perseverance, punctuality, respect, responsibility, self-respect, selfless service and trust.

    Israelis consider the end result of their mandatory service to be national pride, skill and gender equality.  It can do the same in the United States.  Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery; we should not be too proud to copy something that works for others. 

    KEYS TO SUCCESS: 

    A critical step in every long-range strategic planning effort is to STOP about now, take a deep breath and consider that when the overall Concept of Operations has been thought through and at least has touched on most of necessary questions (who-what-when-where-why-and-how?) then ask, what are the keys to success?  Or stated another way, what can cause this to fail? The keys to success for Universal Service for America are:

    A Public Relations Campaign that is nation-wide and very robust.

    Resist becoming fully engaged until we have had the opportunity to learn from a pilot program of at least one year.  Learn to walk before we try to run.

    Character Development is the pillar that will make Universal Service for America last for a lifetime.  In the daily routine, the period devoted to Character Development must be priority number one.

    Everything in the program must contribute to and point toward creating a lasting culture of accountability, respect and trust. 

    The program will fail if it becomes government-run. It will fail if it becomes a political football from administration to administration and/or from one Congress to another. Character development cannot ever be viewed as a partisan issue.

    BOTTOM LINE

    If goodness, and hence greatness, is to be regained for this country, it will be accomplished one person at a time through character development and a culture shift from blame and hate to accountability, trust and respect.

    Just for a moment imagine, across this great nation, millions of young adults in classrooms with their hands on their hearts, looking at the American flag, reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and then sitting down with a dedicated patriot volunteer to discuss character and values. The result will be transformational for generations to come.

    Why should we do this?  To paraphrase a French political philosopher, Alexis de Tocqueville, who came to America in the 1820s to study our nation; he concluded in his book, Democracy in America, that America is great because it is good; when it ceases to be good it will cease to be great.  There needs to be a time and a place wherein all Americans can contemplate goodness and thereby plan to live a more fulfilling and productive life by being all they can be. That time is now and that place will be as a participant in Universal Service for America.  Goodness doesn’t just happen; it is a work in progress. Our intent has to be focused on refreshing and perpetuating America’s goodness.

    WHY NOW?

    On October 30, 2008, just before his election, Obama publicly declared, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” No one at the time understood the details of his intent.  Eight years later his transformation end state was becoming clearer.  The first Trump administration was a bump in the road for the Obama transformation but the Biden/Harris debacle nearly finished the job.  Every aspect of American life; economy, energy, military readiness, deterrence, foreign affairs, lawlessness, wokeness, internal national security, education, culture, etc. etc. are in post-Biden/Harris shambles. 

    On 5 November 2024 the American people voted for change, lots of change. Universal Service for America, if instituted and then institutionalized will, in and of itself, be a transformational undertaking that will positively impact much of the damage the far left has done to our once-great nation.   Now, right now, is the time to act.

    Without action, we can find ourselves, as described so aptly by Shakespear, “stranded in miserable shallows.”

    Put Vice President Vance in the lead of two national issues; 1) make Universal Service for America a reality before the end of this Trump/Vance administration and 2) transform our education system into one in which everything at the local school district level becomes a piece of an overarching, singular, operating Culture of Academic Excellence.  

    Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of VISION TO EXECUTION, a book for leaders, and FIX THE SYSTEMS, TRANSFORM AMERICA as well as the author of a blog WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.

    EDUCATION IN AMERICA IS A DISGRACE

    Certainly not every school is failing and I’m sure most are dedicated and trying hard to do the best they can to turn out well-educated youngsters.  But the facts tell us that in general our education system is not anywhere near what it should be and can be.  In terms of “proficiency”, a very large percentage of students are currently deficient, too many kids dropout of school and way too many high school graduates are in fact functionally illiterate.

    What are we doing about this?  Habitually, when concern over education achievement reaches a critical point, we, the federal and/or state governments, throw money at the problem, and/or increase the number of bureaucrats involved and/or publish more regulations. This has not, is not, will not fix the problem. President Biden’s Dept of Education budget requests were $79.2 billion, FY 2023 and $90 billion, FY 2024.

    It is somewhere between difficult and impossible to solve a problem until one adequately defines the problem.  Let’s see if we can get there.

    SOME GENERALIZATIONS

    Worldwide, there is a correlation between a country’s education system’s quality and its economic status. Quality levels move up from “not developed” nations to “developing” to “developed.” The U.S. should be high on the list.  We are not.

    Results from a 2023 Maryland state math exam reveals that 13, which is 40%, of Baltimore’s High Schools did not have a single math-proficient student. ZERO.

     As of first quarter, FY 2024, there are 115,171 schools in the United States; 95,852 public and 19,329 private schools.

    TESTING ORGANIZATIONS

    There are two organizations that are considered credible when it comes to rating education results. 

    PISA, the Programme for International Student Assessment. The international PISA test is taken by 15-year-olds every three years. in 2019, pre Covid, the U.S. ranked 36th out of 79 countries and regions that participated in the test.

    NAEP, the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests 4th and 8th graders every two years and 12th grade every four years. NAEP, often referred to as “the nation’s report card,” is a congressionally mandated large-scale assessment administered by the National Center for Education Statistics in various subject areas; mathematics, reading, and science are assessed most frequently. Results are reported based on “gender, race/ethnicity, public or nonpublic school, teacher experience, and hundreds of other factors.” NAEP has been testing in the U.S. for over 50 years.  The point being, they appear to be a credible organization and we should be capable of drawing some conclusions from their findings

    The 2019 NAEP results found that U.S. achievement has not progressed over the past decade and, for low-performing students, was the same as 30 years ago.

    NAEP student achievement levels are performance standards that describe what students should know and be able to do.:

    • NAEP Basic: This level denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge.
    • NAEP Proficient: This level represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter to include application of such knowledge to real world situations
    • NAEP Advanced: This level signifies superior performance.

    HOW ARE OUR SCHOOLS DOING?

    High school graduation rates vary by state from 82% to 96%.  But that does not necessarily tell the whole story because it is a fact that some states have lowered the standards for graduation in order to achieve a higher number.

    According to ELEVATE USA, on average, over a million students drop out of high school in the U.S. every year; that’s 5-6,000 every school day thereby creating a linkage to a life of crime and/or welfare.

    “Dropout factories” refer to high schools with less than 60 percent graduating seniors when compared to the number of freshmen. Of the 26,727 public and private high schools in America, almost 2,000 graduate less than 60% of their students. Those dropout factories account for over 50% of the students who leave school every year. One in six U.S. students attend a dropout factory.  One in three minority students (32%) attend a dropout factory compared to 8% of white students.

    Throughout the U.S., of those graduating high school, over 20% are unable to pass the test to enter the U.S. military because they are functionally illiterate.

    In the U.S., high school dropouts commit about 75% of the crimes.

    About 70% of prison inmates do not have a high school diploma.

    More snapshots that illustrate the problems in government-run public schools: 

    • Providence, RI:  Only 5% of eighth graders are proficient in math. 
    • Newark, NJ: 21% proficiency in math.
    • North Carolina: From NAEP 2022 testing, 68% of North Carolina fourth graders were not proficient in reading.
    • Wisconsin: Black American eighth graders perform only slightly better than white fourth graders in reading and math. 
    • Oregon Governor Kate Brown quietly signed a bill on July 14, 2020 that suspends a requirement for Oregon students to demonstrate reading, writing and math proficiency in order to receive a diploma.

    And so it goes across the country.  A recent survey found that 20% of American adults cannot name even one of the three branches of government.

    END OF GRADE TESTING

    My sense is that there is too much emphasis on EOG and when a student does not do well on EOG tests, it is already too late to do anything about it. Normally our school systems do not have summer school programs for deficient students. Proficiency deficiencies just get passed on and, of course, compounded the next year as the teacher has to move on to more advanced subjects.  It is a formula that will guarantee failure on through middle and high school and leads us to our country’s unacceptable dropout numbers.

    HOW BAD IS THE PROFICIENCY ISSUE?

    PRE-COVID NAEP REPORT CARD: In 2019 NAEP tested 150,600 grade 4 students, 143,100 grade 8, and 26,700 grade 12 students and reported the findings.  Here is a summary pulled from a very large comprehensive report:

    READING:  The assessment measures reading comprehension by asking students to read selected grade-appropriate materials and answer questions based on what they have read. 

                                                    Grade 4           Grade 8           Grade 12

    NOT proficient:                         59%                   66%                     76%

    MATHEMATICS: The assessment measures both mathematics knowledge and the students’ ability to apply their knowledge in problem-solving situations.

                                                    Grade 4           Grade 8           Grade 12

    NOT proficient:                         65%                    66%               63%

    Other subjects were even worse.  For high school seniors 88% NOT proficient in history, 77% NOT proficient in writing ability and 78% NOT proficient in science.

    Also keep in mind that there is a category lower than “proficient.” Many of those who are below proficient are actually in the “basic” category or less.  

    CONCLUSIONS

    The above narrative and statistics are designed to do two things. One is to impress on you the length and breadth of the overall education crisis. And secondly to begin to identify and then define problems.  If we cannot articulate the problem, there is no solution.

    What is the main reason students get poor grades?  Why do they fail end-of-grade tests? Why do they drop out? Why do they graduate high school functionally illiterate? The shortest, simplest answer is, at some point THEY GOT BEHIND.

    Once behind they could not catch up and as they moved on to more complex material in the next grade they got even further behind.

    If you look at enough of the NAEP proficiency test results one thing will jump off the page. That is, if the proficiency levels are bad in 4th grade they are going to be worse in 8th grade and too often also worse from 8th to 12th.

    Once behind, grades continue to get worse, students get frustrated, harassed, ridiculed and get to the point that dropping out looks like a good solution and put school in the rear-view mirror.

    UNDERSTANDING THE ABOVE, PERHAPS WE CAN DEFINE TWO PROBLEMS:

    • One, it is inevitable that some students will get behind but, in most schools, there are no adequate systems in place to assist them in quickly catching up. For example, in 2022 only 32% of North Carolina’s 4th grade students scored at or above proficient on the NAEP reading assessment, placing NC 23rd among all states. There is no way for those thousands of kids to catch up during their upcoming 5th grade year.
    • Two, “basic training” is inadequate.  It is a valid conclusion that almost any training regimen in life will begin with what we usually refer to as “basic training”, that is, the fundamentals upon which everything thereafter will hinge. Think of it as the foundation. That is exactly what is supposed to happen in grades K-4, instill a solid foundation for academic excellence. When NAEP test results tell us that across the country 65% of 4th graders are not proficient in math, basic training gets an “F”.

    A SOLUTION, THE MAIN ATTACK

    Translated, main attack means the three traditional levels of K-12 education, elementary, middle and high school should not be considered equals when it comes to priorities, funding, resourcing, etc. The main attack has to be K-4 with a properly resourced, lasting, comprehensive foundation. One part of the solution might be that all classes K-4 should be smaller with a more effective teacher/student ratio.

    WHEN A STUDENT GETS BEHIND, DEFINE THE WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY and HOW OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE?

    WHO?

    Oversight: We do not need a federal Department of Education. We do not need state Departments of Education.

    Local Boards of Education: They are short-term elected officials.  They need to be supportive but cannot be counted on to consistently articulate and lead the strategic plan for academic excellence. 

    Superintendents: They must be selected based on their strong leadership abilities and dedication to long-term strategic planning for academic excellence for every school in their district. Resourcing and leading academic excellence must be their number one priority.

    School Principals: they must be strong leaders at the operational level; live and breathe academic excellence every day. Their undisputed priorities are number one a safe and secure environment and number two academic excellence in every classroom every day. They must approve every teacher’s layout of lesson plans for every school semester.  Then they must be in the rear of the classrooms part of every school day to assess and if necessary, mentor teachers to perform differently and/or better.

    Teachers: Teachers are the first line leaders at the point of execution every school day. Their constant rhythm must be teach/test/teach/test. From weekly testing, immediately identify any student who gets behind and when identified take immediate action.

    The U.S. President: Advocate publicly for this academic excellence concept of operations.  Give it a name. Talk about it. In 2002 President Bush signed into law the “No Child Left Behind Act.” It was popular, it was a topic of conversation and most everyone was aware of it.  It also failed.  Why? In the final analysis it was just another big government program costing billion with masses of bureaucrats and regulations just like most of the programs administered by the federal Department of Education since 1979 which has led us to where we are today, knee deep in an education crisis. Call this program, No Child Gets Behind.

    President Trump should try to build the same level of awareness that No Child Left Behind had but in its place advocate for No Child Gets Behind that is free, no government oversight and no government regulations.  Make No Child Gets Behind a program that totally lives within the 13,253 U.S. school districts.

    The NAEP, National Assessment of Education Progress is actually a testing organization buried within the Department of Education.  The president should increase their budget to include more testing during the K-4 Main Attack phase.

    Governors:  They should publicly support this decentralized academic excellence, No Child Gets Behind endeavor. Publicly celebrate the state’s best performing school district. The Governor could host an academic excellence best-practices web site to spread the best thinking to all of the state’s school districts.

    Unions:  They are a bigger part of the problem than the solution.  You can count on it, they will raise hell about teachers having to spend time doing more testing. National education unions should have zero input or influence on education policy and practices. 

    The Academic Excellence Team: At the point of execution, the academic excellence team, consisting of the parents, teacher and student, must be in continuous communications with respect to academic excellence and particularly with respect to a student that is getting behind in their proficiency level.

    That was WHO should be involved, now:

    WHAT SHOULD TAKE PLACE?

    For every project or operation there is a center of gravity.  Center of gravity can be a person, place and/or circumstance that is central to success or could cause failure. Centers of gravity must be identified by the leaders before the beginning of every phase of an operation, resourced and tracked continuously.

    Testing is the center of gravity for academic excellence and, as pointed out above, relying on End of Grade testing is grossly insufficient.

    Make every Thursday quiz day throughout the entire school. That is, test the material that was covered over the previous few days.  Short simple questions with short simple answers; the test can be administered in only a few minutes and graded quickly.  Jimmy failed the quiz and the immediate assumption must be that he is behind.

    At the dinner table every Wednesday parents should be asking Jimmy and Susan, “are you ready for the quiz tomorrow?”

    Weekly quizzes will be reinforced with regular 6-week testing followed by issuing individual report cards that must be returned with a parent signature.

    The school Principal must ensure that a catch-up model is in-place and operational at all times.

    Jimmy is behind. First, the teacher will activate the academic excellence team; that is, get the parents involved. Inform then that Jimmy will have extensive homework for the weekend that must be signed by the parents before Jimmy returns to class the following Monday morning. If necessary, continue sending homework home every day for the following week.  Again, all returned homework must be signed by the parents. 

    The second part of the Principal’s catch-up model is a team of volunteer tutors who are available for after-school mentoring of students whose parents are unable, and/or unwilling to help their child through the homework which is tailored to get the student who is behind back on track quickly.

    RESOURCING THIS SOLUTION

    Billions of dollars? No. More bureaucrats for oversight? No. More regulations? No.

    What it will take is stronger leadership, concise standards, ingenuity, a national consensus for change and less or no education union interference.  

    WHEN should all this take place?

    Now. President Trump should meet with all of the Governors for a session specifically on education. Explain all of the above to them in detail.

    Then he should address the nation specifically on the subject of education. Make it clear to the American public that the 13,253 school district Superintendents must lead the effort locally, must innovate, must change, must seek out and implement best practices.

    President Trump should explain that the habitual failed solution of throwing billions of dollars, bureaucrats and regulations at a national crisis is not how his government is going to operate. He has faith in the American people to solve the problem at their level.

    WHERE should this take place?

    Obviously, in every public and private school in America.

    WHY are we doing this?

    Education results in America are unbecoming of our great nation and are degrading the work force.

    HOW are we going to do it?

    With American leadership, intuition, grit and determination, just as we have solved every other great crisis throughout our history.

    BOTTOM LINE:

    Some of you are saying, so Covault you believe all we have to do is begin giving quizzes on Thursday and the education crisis will be solved.

    My response is threefold:

    One, nothing the governments, county to federal, are doing is working.

    Two, it’s not just giving quizzes.  It’s about giving quizzes in an organizational environment that is totally committed, from the student/parent/teacher team to the Superintendent, local Board of Education and to the local community, to an uncompromising all-encompassing culture of academic excellence.

    Three, if you have a better idea that also does not cost anything, I’m all ears.  

    A final thought. We are fortunate to have J.D. Vance as our Vice President. Intelligent, likeable, articulate, great background, great family etc. etc., he has the potential to be one of the greatest VPs in our history and be perfectly positioned to follow President Trump in 2028.  But he should not languish as VP.  He needs President Trump to delegate some of the most important issues and problems to him.  Regaining academic excellence throughout America could be one of those issues.  If President chooses to address the American citizens on the education crisis, it would be the perfect time to introduce J.D. Vance as the education czar.  It is another good reason to eliminate the Dept of Education from the Executive Branch.

    Motivate, don’t regulate. Decentralized execution is the center of gravity for achieving academic excellence again.

    “Education is the wellspring from which a nation ascends … or the quagmire into which it sinks.  Education is everything.”  Michael Russell

    ADD “WELFARE TO WORK” TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TO-DO LIST

    ADD “WELFARE TO WORK” TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TO-DO LIST

    Why add fixing welfare to President Trump’s list?  Because President Clinton and Speaker Newt Gingrich put in a major fix in 1996 and Obama/Biden tore it apart.  Now we have a welfare crisis, control of Congress and it can/should get fixed.  It is another action that will save the taxpayers billions of dollars by putting people back to work.

    There are masses of numbers associated with work, workers and welfare. My intent was to sort through it all and paint a numbers picture of the work, worker, welfare situation in America today.  Numbers are the story and it is not a pretty picture.

    LABOR PARTICIPATION RATE

    According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the labor force participation rate is an estimate of an economy’s active workforce. The formula is the number of people ages 16 and older who are employed or actively seeking employment, divided by the total civilian working-age population.

    Background; when Obama/Biden took over in January 2009 the labor participation rate was 65.7%. That was the beginning of an 8-year steady decline until they departed the White House January 2017 with a participation rate of 62.8%’ about a 3% decline. Is 3% a big deal?  Yes, it’s significant because in 2017 there were 165.2 million workers involved. Each percentage point represents 1.652 million workers time 3 percent equals an Obam/Biden loss of about 5 million workers. That was an element of Obama’s declared formula to “fundamentally transform America.”

    President Trump got the participation rate up from the Obama/Biden low of 62.8% to 63.3% in his first two years in office. By 2019 pre-covid, that was an increase of over 800,000 workers.

    During 2024 the U.S. labor force participation rate has ranged between a low of 62.5% (January) and a high of 62.6%. (October). And Biden kept telling us how successful Bidenomics has been and that he has added 15 million jobs.  No, it didn’t happen, not even close. An increase of one tenth of one percent represents about 165,000, jobs, not 15 million.

    PRESIDENT CLINTON AND SPEAKER NEWT GINGRICH, 1996

    In 1996 President Bill Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. The legislation substantially reconstructed the nation’s welfare system by giving state governments more autonomy over welfare services while also reducing the federal government’s role. Yes, President Trump, it can be done.

    The Welfare-to-Work Act, as it became known, provided for the following:

    • The act ended welfare as an entitlement program.
    • Required recipients to begin working after two years of receiving benefits.
    • Placed a lifetime limit of five years on benefits paid by federal funds.
    • Sought to encourage two-parent families and to discourage out-of-wedlock births.
    • Enhanced enforcement of child support.
    • Stricter conditions for food stamps eligibility, reductions in immigrant welfare assistance, and recipient work requirements.
    • And required state professional and occupational licenses to be withheld from undocumented immigrants.

    As he signed the bill on August 22, 1996, President Clinton stated that the act “gives us a chance we haven’t had before to break the cycle of dependency that has existed for millions and millions of our fellow citizens, exiling them from the world of work. It gives structure, meaning and dignity to most of our lives”.

    The Welfare to Work Act created a foundational principle of “personal responsibility”; it changed the culture of U.S. welfare. Now, 28 years later, we can/should do it again.

    TANF, TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES

    The Welfare to Work Act ended six decades of federal government control of the programs. In the process of dismantling the old model, President Clinton created something, different and critical to success; the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, TANF, which changed the financing and benefit structure of cash welfare assistance. Instead of welfare being funded in an open-ended manner, welfare became funded by federal block grants to states, along with a requirement that states had to match some of the federal dollars.

    TANF:

    • Added work requirements for aid, shrinking the number of adults who could qualify for benefits.
    • It created caps for how long and how much aid a person could receive.
    • It instituted harsher punishments for recipients who did not comply with the requirements.

    Following on, President Bush called on the Senate to take action to continue the historic progress of welfare reform and ensure that more Americans are able to achieve independence through work.

    Did TANF work?  In its annual report to Congress on the level of welfare dependency in the country, the Department of Health and Human Services found that 4.7 million fewer Americans were dependent on welfare three years after welfare reform was first passed in 1996. The percentage of the population dependent on welfare fell from 5.2% to 3.3% during that time. Yes, it worked and it can work again, President Trump.

    WELFARE AND POVERTY, THEY ARE CONNECTED

    As the rate of welfare dependency declined, the overall poverty rate in America fell. In the four years following enactment of welfare reform, 5.4 million fewer Americans were in poverty. Within those four years, the poverty rate for all individuals fell from 13.7% to 11.3%, the lowest rate since 1979.

    2009: ENTER OBAMA/BIDEN WITH THEIR AMERICAN TRANSFORMATION SCHEME.

    “Without authority, Obama moves workers back to welfare” were the headlines.

    In a classic case of Executive Branch abuse of regularity power, Obama/Biden cut the legs off from the TANF program by informing the states that they could apply to the Secretary of the federal Department of Health and Human Services for a waiver of the work requirements contained in the law.  That Obama/Biden move could have and should have been challenged by Congress and/or the Supreme Court because the work requirement was an essential element of the law and one that the statute specifically said cannot be waived. But it was not challenged.

    The Obama/Biden initiative killed a 12-year-old successful program with the following negative ramifications: 

    • As previously pointed out, the U.S. labor force participation rate went down about 3% which meant that about 5 million able-bodied welfare recipients did not transition from welfare to work.
    • The federal government essentially regained control of the welfare program and reverted back to the bad-old-days. Vote buying.
    • Obama/Biden significantly added to the size of the Welfare/Poverty Identity Group voting block that, understandably, can be relied on to vote for the democrats.
    • The Congressional Research Service reported that the number of able-bodied adults on food stamps doubled after Obama suspended work requirements.
    • By 2016, a record 47 million Americans receive food stamps, about 13 million more than when Obama/Biden took office.
    • Increased welfare does not solve the poverty issue. The Census Bureau put the number of Americans in poverty at 45.3 million as of 2013. That’s about 5.5 million more people in poverty than there were in 2008 before Obama/Biden took office.
    • When the labor force participation falls, tax revenue falls and government revenue is reduced as welfare costs go up; the perfect formula for deficit spending and long-rang debt increases.
    • Government spending on welfare increased 32% during the Obama/Biden first term.

    WHAT DID BIDEN LEARN DURING HIS 8-YEAR TUTELAGE UNDER OBAMA?

    Biden’s first budget submission in 2021 expanded welfare without work incentives setting the stage to trap a new generation of Americans into a cycle of dependency and thus poverty.   In fiscal year 2022, the federal government spent$1.19 trillion   on more than 80 different welfare programs. That represents almost 20% of total federal spending and a quarter of tax revenues in 2022. The Congressional Budget Office has projected $12.7 trillion in spending on these programs over the FY 2024-2033 budget window.

    What did Biden learn from Obama? He learned how to advance the movement towards a welfare state. I am not suggesting that Obama/Biden want the U.S. to become a socialist society.  But if one looks carefully at the widely-accepted formula for transforming to a socialist nation, consider the following:

    What are Obama’s building blocks to “systematically transform America? They came from Saul Alinsky, 1909-1972, a Chicago-based organizer, community activist and political theorist. Considered the father of community organizers, he became Obama’s philosophical mentor; Obama quotes him often in his book.

    It is enlightening to align Alinsky’s “eight steps from democracy to a socialist society” with what has happened to America under Obama/Biden leadership.

    • Step one, healthcare: “Control Healthcare and you control the People.” Democrats campaigned in 2020 for “Medicare for all.”  
    • Step two, poverty: “Increase the poverty level as high as possible, Poor People are easier to control and will not fight back if the government is providing everything for them to live.”

    Here are some 2022 quick facts about poverty provided by Poverty USA. The poverty threshold for an individual is a household income of approximately $13,000 per year, and it’s roughly $26,000 per year for a family of four. 37 million Americans are living in poverty, which makes the poverty rate 11.4%. There are over 11 million children in poverty.

    • Three, debt: “Increase the National Debt to an unsustainable level.” Obama/Biden created more national debt in 8 years than all previous administrations in U.S. history combined.
    • Four, gun control: “Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government.  That way you are able to create a Police State with total local control.”  Gun control is a habitual Democrat priority subject. 
    • Five, welfare: “Take control of every aspect of their lives, food, livestock, housing, and income.” Government spending on welfare increased 32% during the Obama/Biden first term.
    • Six, education: “Take control of what People read and listen to; take control of what Children learn in school.” That is currently happening across the nation in grades K-12 and in colleges and universities and hopefully fixing education is already on President Trump’s to-do list.
    • Seven, religion: “Remove faith in God from the government and schools.” Almost there.
    • Eight, class warfare: “Divide the people into the wealthy against the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with full support of
      the voting poor
      .” This was the Democrat campaign plan in 2024, “Tax the rich”.

    If you believe the Alinsky eight steps to socialism has some validity, and if you also believe the lid is already on the coffin, all that remains is to nail it down. President Trump, we need to act now to reverse these trends.

    CONCLUSION:

    The government is complicit in supporting those who can work but choose not to. Complicit how? By supporting a welfare system that can cause millions of Americas to literally sign up for and be captured in a (President Clinton’s words), “cycle of dependency.”

    BOTTOM LINE WITH NUMBERS:

    • The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that in2024 there are about 209 million working-age men in America,
    • About 89% of them, (186 million) have a job or are actively looking for a job.
    • That tells us there are about 23 million men who do not have a job and are not looking for one.
    • it is not an issue of not being able to find a job, 23 million have simply opted out altogether and are living on the government dole.
    • Meanwhile, a federal count from November 2023 tells us that more than 770,000 manufacturing jobs were open and manufacturing workers are, on average, earning more than $30 an hour.
    • The U.S. welfare system consists of 80+ federal programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care, social services, training, and targeted education aid to poor and low-income Americans. Too much.  Too invasive. And for too many, obviously too tempting. 

    Americans are the most benevolent people on earth.  We will always take care of those who cannot take care of themselves.  But 80+ government welfare programs run by an enormous out of control bureaucracy can actually cause more harm than good. That is evidenced by comparing the Welfare-to-Work results from 1996 to 2008 against the Obama/Biden transformation formula.   

    America was built on a culture of hard work and generally we do not look favorably on those who can work but choose instead to sit on their ass and wait for their monthly welfare checks from we-the-working-people.

    The statistical gains for Americans during the 1996-2008 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families are not just proof of concept, they are proof of policy.  The how to make Welfare to Work a reality again is there for the taking. Just make it happen President Trump.

    AN EPIDEMIC OF BLINDNESS, ADDITIONS TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TO-DO LIST

    Warning to readers, this is long.  I’m into sales and my intent is to convince you that it is possible to solve three of America’s current crises, culture, education and race relations without spending any taxpayer dollars.  If you are interested, please read on. 

    As a New York Times bestselling author, David Brooks observes, “There is one skill that lies at the heart of any healthy person, family, school, community organization or society: the ability to see someone else deeply and make them feel seen—to accurately know another person, to let them feel valued, heard and understood.” Brooks’ latest book, How to Know a Person is a who/what/when/where/why and how in-depth look at us, we-the-people.

    Let’s begin with a list of sad statistics pulled from a short chapter entitled, An Epidemic of Blindness.  He concluded, “We live in an environment in which political animosities, technological dehumanization and social breakdown undermine connection, strain friendships, erase intimacy and foster distrust. Here are some statistics that led him to that conclusion:

    • Between 1999 and 2019 suicide rates increased 33%.
    • Between 2009 and 2019 the percentage of teens who reported persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness rose from 26% to 37%.  By 2021 it had shot up to 44%.
    • The percentage of Americans who said they have no close friends, quadrupled between 1990 and 2020.
    • 54% of Americans reported that no one knows them well.
    • 36% of Americans reported that they feel lonely almost all of the time including 61% of young adults and 51% of young mothers.
    • The General Social Survey asked Americans to rate their happiness levels. Between 1990 and 2018 the share of Americans who put themselves in the lowest happiness category increased by more than 50%.
    • Sadness, lack of recognition and loneliness turn into bitterness, which can lead on to meanness which has caused a marked increase in hate crimes.
    • This social breakdown manifests itself as a crisis of distrust. Two generations ago, roughly 60% of Americans said that most people can be trusted; by 2014, only 30.3% did.
    • Ultimately, the sadness and dehumanization pervading society has led to violence, both emotional and physical. Sadness, dehumanization and Loneliness too often, in reflection, tend to define school shooters which was almost unheard of before 1999.
    • Brooks goes on to introduce the phrase “moral formation” which is about three simple practical things. 

    First, it is about helping people learn how to restrain their selfishness and incline their heart to care more about others.

    Second, it’s about helping people find a purpose, so their life has stability, direction, and meaning. 

    Third, moral formation is about teaching the basic social and emotional skills so one can be kind and considerate to the people around them. 

    Those three items are especially applicable to this article because those words are a part of what I am going to outline as a long-range strategic concept of operations to fix, “the epidemic of blindness” existing throughout our country today.

    Brooks’ research suggests that earlier in our history, education did focus on moral formation. Educators thought it was their primary job to turn out people of character.  But, in mid-20th century the focus on moral formation began to fall away.  By the 1960s deliberate moral education was in full-scale retreat.

    In a sense, American culture became demoralized by the 1990s usage of morality-related words had plummeted; “bravery” down 66%, “gratitude” down 49%, “humbleness” down 52%.  In a 2018 poll only 7% said helping other people gave them meaning in life. 

    Recent generations of Americans have not been taught the skills they need in order to see, understand, and respect other people.

    Thank you, David Brooks, for those insights. Now to the question, how are we going to turn all this around? There are going to be three issues in play in this concept of operations, culture, education and race relations. Why?  Because the solution to any one of the three critical issues, coincidently can be the solution to the other two. Three for the price of one.  And by the way, if done properly, the price to the taxpayers will be $0.00.

    Since 5 November, change is in the air.  There are growing expectations across the country that President Trump has a mandate to fix some of our most serious problems and culture, education and race relations are certainly three of the most critical. Let’s get on with the fix.

    First define the three problems, culture/education/race relations.

    CULTURE IS A POWERFUL, PERVASIVE FORCE

    There is a culture associated with every organization no matter how large or small. A two-person team as well as the largest of organizations will over time develop a culture that can be defined. Culture is an organization’s personality; caring, hateful, fast, energetic, visionary, risk-taking, vengeful, selfless, selfish, accommodating, respectful, unethical and on and an. I believe the pervasive culture in the United States of America can be generally classified as A Culture of Hate and Blame. That is not where we want to be or should be and certainly not a way to move forward.

    EDUCATION IS IN A PATHETIC STATE AND GETTING WORSE

    The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that in FY 2023, 614,000 students dropped out of high school, 3,411 per school day, and statistically become a life-time drain and strain on society. Others are allowed to slip through the system and graduate from high school but are actually functionally illiterate.

    For decades the National Assessment of Education Progress, has been routinely testing hundreds of thousands of students in grades 4, 8 and 12. The results are called The Nation’s Report Card. Reading and math proficiency percentages provide a short-hand look at where we were in 2019, pre-Covid, scoring stats. This is about proficiency or the lack thereof. Proficiency is, “demonstration of some competency over challenging subject matter.”

    Math: 4th grade 67% NOT proficient, 8th grade 71% NOT proficient, 12th grade 63% NOT proficient.

    Reading: 4th grade 68% NOT proficient, 8th grade 66% NOT proficient, 12th grade 69% NOT proficient.

    Statistics are available for all other subjects and scoring is generally worse than math and reading. President Trump is correct, education needs reform. But…..

    Top-down programs do not work: The federal government has a horrible record in trying to run anything, especially education.  Since the Federal Government established the Department of Education in 1979, we have seen one failed program after another as each succeeding administration tries to “fix” education from the top down with hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands of bureaucrats and regulations.

    Our proficiency levels and world rankings in education tell us we are stuck in a place we do not want to be.

    RACE RELATIONS CAN AND MUST BE IMPROVED

    There is no definitive measure of where we are with respect to race relations, but events continue to tell us it is not anywhere near good enough.

    Ground truth, babies of all races are not born bigoted, disrespecting or hateful.  While growing up they learn it. They learn it at home, in school, on the playground and on the streetWe simply have to change what children learn.

    NO QUICK FIX

    To fix all three of these issues, we need to become comfortable thinking in terms of generations to institutionalize this concept of operations and get where we all have the opportunity to be all we can be every day. 

    Today, we adults, for he most part, are a lost cause. The solution will only come if we change what our youngsters learn, how they think, what they believe in and how they behave.

    The good news is this concept of operations does not need federal or state masses of bureaucrats with their reems of regulations and the equally good news is, it is free. 

    CAMPAIGN HOME ROOM, THE WAY FORWARD

    First, who will be involved in some way in this campaign?

    -130,000 K-12 public and private schools

    -50 million K-12 students

    -180 million adults with a school-age child

    -4.5 million teachers

    -2 million Home Room volunteers, (more on this later)

    -Over 200,000 Superintendents, Principles and Education Board members

    That’s over 80% of adults in America involved in some way with this campaign.

    The plan is for 50 million kids to be in a Home Room class at 0800 every school day for about 20 minutes for 13 school-years with volunteer instructors. They will discuss values and character.

    President-elect Trump campaigned on fixing education in America.  Here sir, is a program for you.

    This concept paper is laid out as a national campaign with President Trump leading.  But if that does not happen, the concept as written can also be applicable for action by any individual state led by the Governor. In the absence of any Federal or State sponsorship, Campaign Home Room can be picked up by any county or city Board of Education and executed.  At whatever level this program is activated, it can be successful, it will make a positive difference and it will be transformative for the communities involved. 

    Structure each Home Room with a cross section of the class population.  For example, visualize a school that has 75 new kindergarten students entering school in August, twenty-five kids per class.  Populate each Home Room with students from each of the three classes.  During the following 13 years, some youngsters will move away and some new ones will move in; but for the most part that Home Room group will stay together until graduation.  That is part of the power of the Home Room concept.

    This Concept of Operations to fix the above discussed problems is not a guessing game.  The strength of this concept is that there are existing successful models we can lean on and learn from. 

    Youngsters who are committed to youth organizations such as Scouting, First Tee, Boys and Girls Clubs avoid joining gangs or becoming bigoted because they have developed a positive value base.  They have learned accountability; they trust each other and respect authority.  But these great programs only touch a fraction of the kids.  We have to teach values to every youngster in the United States for generations to come. 

    EXECUTION, THE HOME ROOM CURRICULUM

    The first 20-30 minutes of every school day in every school, K-12, will be Home Room. The subject matter will be:

    ACCOUNTABILITY, CITIZENSHIP, COMMITMENT, COMPASSION, COURAGE OF CONVICTIONS, COURTESY, CONFIDENCE, HEALTHY HABITS, HONESTY, HONOR, HUMILITY, INTEGRITY, JUDGMENT, LEADERSHIP, MORALITY, PERSEVERANCE, PUNCTUALITY, RESPECT, RESPONSIBILITY, SELF-RESPECT, SELFLESS SERVICE, SPORTSMANSHIP AND TRUST.

    That is, teach and talk about values.  Call it the Character Curriculum. There will need to be three versions of the curriculum; elementary K-5, middle school 6-8 and high school 9-12.  Out of this will come an overpowering culture of ACCOUNTABILITY, RESPECT AND TRUST.

    In many large schools a student may not even know all of their “classmates” but they sure will know their Home Room mates.  They will get to know them like brothers and sisters.  They will have deep feelings and respect for their Home Room mates.  Over time Home Rooms will have names, mascots, tee-shirts, a website, competition with other Home Rooms, an unshakable identity, peer pressure and peer support.  “I have your back” will become an unspoken pledge from each to all.  The Home Room will become powerful, effective and it is free.  It is a game changer.

    In this day and age of peer pressure to join a gang the Home Room can, from kindergarten on, provide an alternative.  For every student, their Home Room can become their “gang” throughout their elementary and secondary education years.  Every student in the United States will have a small group they can identify with and turn to for peer support.

    Bullying has always been a problem for youngsters and seemingly more so today with the availability of social media.  Home Room will bring bullying to its knees in two different ways.    First of all, every student will now know that their Home Room gang has their back.  The students will look after each other and protect one another.  Secondly, one of the most powerful subjects in the Home Room Character Curriculum is respect.

    By their very nature, bullies do not respect others or authority.   With respect imprinted on the soul of every youngster and emphasized day after day, year after year throughout their student careers, it is doubtful that bullying will even be a mentionable problem in the future. 

    Truancy is an enormous problem in this country and is the super highway to dropping out of school.  With the bond built among a group of Home Room kids over the years it will not be easy to bring one’s self to skip school.  Accountability will become a powerful way of life for every student. 

    Home Room does not require funding.  Personnel on the educational payroll will not lead or teach Home Room.  It will be done by volunteers and we will need a lot of them.  If the average size Home Room is 25 students, we will have about 2 million Home Room classes in session every school day. 

    Just imagine the impact Campaign Home Room can have with 50 million youngsters standing with their hand over their heart reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and then participating in a substantive discussion about one of the subjects in the Character Curriculum every school day and then adjourning to their class rooms to live/be/do/demonstrate those values.  How powerful is that?

    TWO MILLION VOLUNTEERS

    How do we find and train 2 million volunteers?  The essence of this campaign is decentralized execution.  Each individual school Principal will be responsible for finding a handful of volunteers and that should not be a problem.  For example, there are about 70 million Baby Boomers retiring at a rate of about 10,000 per day and many are looking for something interesting, meaningful, and challenging to do in retirement. 

    Tap in to local organizations and churches for help: Kiwanis, Lions Club, Chamber of Commerce, VFW, American Legion, AARP, Shriners, Country Clubs, etc.  Get them to sponsor an entire school and provide all the Home Room instructors.  Easy to do and retirees bring a wealth of knowledge and experience for the mentoring of youngsters. 

    Additionally, there are almost two million retired military men and women across the country.  They all have three things in common: they are proven leaders, they are teachers and they have spent their professional lives in a fully integrated and value-based organization in which they operated daily immersed in a culture of ACCOUNTABILITY, TRUST AND RESPECT.  They have the perfect skill set to administer the Home Room Character Curriculum. 

    True story. A few years ago, I was invited by the paster of a large church in my community to speak at the Wednesday church supper gathering of about 75 folks; Twenty-minute presentation about the concept of Campaign Home Room and 10 minutes of Q and A.  About a week later the paster called to thank me. He also reported that there was a lot of positive talk around the church about Home Room. He told me that if I could get Campaign Home Room started in our local school system, he already lined up about 300 volunteer instructors from the church. Yes, communities with step forward.

    Teachers and administrators should be seated in the back of the room observing the Home Room instruction/discussion.  Why?  The power of the program is that the students will take the values from the Home Room to the classroom if they are prompted all day to do so. 

    FIRST TEE, PROOF OF CONCEPT

    We can begin Campaign Home Room with a load of information and results from actual character training by reviewing what First Tee has accomplished over the past 27 years.

    1997, then-PGA TOUR Commissioner Tim Finchem was joined in New York City’s Central Park by representatives from the leading golf organizations, US Golf Association officials and President George H. W. Bush to announce the launch of First Tee.  

    First Tee mission is, “to impact the lives of young people by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.”

    First Tee is a national non-profit organization devoted to teaching the “Nine Core Values” (respect, honesty, integrity, sportsmanship, confidence, responsibility, perseverance, courtesy and judgment) plus Nine Healthy Habits and introduction to the game of golf.

    Since 1997, First Tee has grown into a preeminent youth development organization with 150 chapters with programs delivered at 1,400 golf courses, 10,000 schools and 1,700 youth centers in all 50 states.

    Golf is a sport enjoyed for a life-time by over 100 million players around the world.  One unique aspect of golf as a sport is that while there are lots of rules, there are no referees. Every player declares their own infractions.  Honesty, accountability and sportsmanship are in play all the time and great practical application for youngsters.

    DOES CHARACTER TRAINING WORK?

    The desire to understand how character training impacts young people prompted First Tee to sanction a study by an outside group of highly qualified researchers.  It began in 2003 with a snapshot look at the program with the following results:

    Communications skills…..74% positive, 24% no change, 2% negative

    Confidence.……………………76% positive, 22% no change, 2% negative

    Responsibility…………………74% positive, 24% no change, 2% negative

    School grades………….….….52% positive, 44% no change, 4% negative

    Social skills………………………66% positive, 30% no change, 4% negative

    With these impressive results First Tee then sanctioned a four-year study, 2005-2008 with the following findings:

    • 73% of The First Tee participants were retained in the program from year one to year four of the research.  This retention rate is impressive given the average dropout rate per year is about 50% in other youth organizations. 
    • Year one:  Character training impacts the lives of students quickly.  During year one the participants declared there was a positive life skill transfer to school work (100%), a job (35%), friends (60%), activities (30%), family (85%) and sports (70%). 
    • Year two:  First Tee participants were compared to youth in after-school activities without a life skills curriculum. The First Tee youth scored higher than the comparison group on use of general life skills including goal-setting, taking initiative and managing their emotions, as well as on most measures of transferring life skills and demonstrating positive character traits. These differences between First Tee youth and the comparison group were statistically significant.
    • Year three:  73% reported high confidence in their ability to do well academically.
    • Year four:  In each of the four years of the study, 100% of First Tee participants identified school as a setting in which the character training transferred positively.

    The best feedback I can report to you is what has been relayed to me in conversations with teachers while working with First Tee CEO and the national staff as well as with a local chapter.  While every teacher was initially skeptical about using 20 minutes of valuable school time each day, every teacher reported that to their surprise and delight within just a few weeks their students changed; became more attentive, more polite, more cooperative and more accountable.  Music to my ears.

    This nation does not need a pilot program to test character training, we just need to execute.

    TEMPLATE BEST PRACTICES:  

    This concept of operations provides the basics for Home Room operations.  But we all know that after implementation there will be a plethora of new good ideas.  Home Rooms will have names, T-shirts, perhaps a website and competition with other Home Rooms.  Community service should become a traditional Home Room activity for high school students. Some schools will reward outstanding high school seniors by having them partner with the Home Room volunteers to teach and discuss the Character Curriculum.  Some schools will use the best and brightest high school students to tutor struggling students whose parents are unable or incapable of tutoring their children.  The list goes on and on and is only limited by imagination. 

    At some point, perhaps in the sixth grade, a Home Room student will suggest to her mates that they challenge the other Home Rooms to a grade-point-average competition.  At that point that school just reached the Promised Land. 

    Innovation has been the lifeblood of this nation since its inception.  Whatever Home Room function is found to work in one community should be templated and shared.  Each Governor should have a Campaign Home Room website set up to publish innovative ideas and best practices.

    MAXIMUM CENTRALIZED PLANNING, MAXIMUM DECENTRALIZED EXECUTION: 

    Since the establishment of the federal Department of Education in 1979 there has been program after program forced down to the states and counties by the federal government.  Additionally, every presidential candidate since then has campaigned on a pledge to improve education.  It has not and will not happen as long as the process is so politicized and frequently changed.  Policy driven, top-down solutions overseen by masses of bureaucrats has not worked in the past and will not work going forward.

    For Campaign Home Room, centralized planning is by the President and Governors and those they have chosen to assist with implementing phase 1 of the campaign.  Maximum decentralized execution is from the County/City Board of Education Chairperson on down through the Superintendent to the school Principals.  There is no requirement for thick pamphlets dictating rules, regulations and reporting requirements; this concept of operations is the basic plan. 

    Maximum centralized planning with maximum centralized regulation is a loser, especially for education.  Maximum centralized planning, maximum decentralized execution is a proven model because it pushes the decision-making down closest to the point of execution. 

    With decentralized execution of Campaign Home Room, the local county/city populace will soon come to understand that the accountable officers, the Superintendent and the School Principals, are right there in their community and are not some nameless, faceless bureaucrat in Washington DC. 

    The Superintendent and the local school Principal can be approached, talked to and debated.  What happens next is that the Superintendents who are weak leaders and the principals who can’t plan will be replaced by leaders who can and will deliver high school graduates in greater numbers and those who do graduate will have the cognitive skills necessary to be productive citizens.

    DEFINING CAMPAIGN FAILURE 

    The four potential enemies of this campaign are politics, the not-invented-here crowd, bureaucratic oversight and impatience.

    Politics:  If this campaign becomes a Democrat vs Republican political pawn, it will crumble and fail.  Therefore, each succeeding President and Governor, in turn, must see the long-range value of this program and keep it on track without federal or state funding. 

    Not-invented-here: In every campaign, there are those persons and organizations that believe if something was not their idea then it most certainly cannot be of much value.  Defeat the not-invented-here crowd with fast action and wide-spread support for the campaign.

    Bureaucratic oversight:  This is not a program that needs a mass of federal or state regulations, rules and reporting requirements.  Keep Campaign Home Room in its simplest form and execute from the County/City Board of Education level down.  

    Impatience:  The campaign will certainly yield improvement in the first two or three years but it must be understood that, generally speaking, this is a generational campaign.   After one complete cycle of K-12 the results, the transforming of this nation, will be astounding. 

    PRESIDENT TRUMP CAN LAUNCH CAMPAIGN HOME ROOM IN THREE PHASES:

    Phase 1 is the centralized planning phase at the federal level January through spring 2025 and at the state level on through August, 2025.

    The senior leader of any large organization will spend a great deal of their time building consensus for strategic campaigns.  It will be critical for President Trump to do so as early as possible.  Governors, minority leaders, educators and legislators must all get briefed and brought on board during early months for phase 1.

    After the Governors meet with President Trump, they should become active by laying out the decentralized plan for leaders in every school district to take the ball and run with it.    

    Phase 2 begins August, 2025 and is one year long.  During this phase the County/City Boards of Education, Superintendents and school Principals will undertake the detailed decentralized planning actions outlined in this Concept of Operations. 

    Phase 3 begins decentralized execution of Campaign Home Room, August 2026, hopefully in every school in America.


    ACCOUNTABLE LEADERS: 

    The President will be overall lead.  His principal responsibility is to shape the environment by bringing all the Governors on board and building consensus among all the constituencies involved throughout the nation. 

    The Secretary of Education, if the department remains active, will advocate nationally for the program.  

    Governors will embrace the program, build consensus among Superintendents, educators, minority leaders, legislators and then quickly decentralize to the local Boards of Education.

    The State Board of Education Chairperson and the State Superintendent of Schools will actively advocate for state-wide buy-in of Campaign Home Room.

    The local Boards of Education, Superintendents and Principals are the accountable leaders for Phase 3, detailed decentralized planning.

    STRATEGIC PLANNING: WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY AND HOW:

    Who: the entire “education organization”; students, parents, teachers, administrators and volunteers; all 236 million of them.

    What: dramatically improve education and race relations while transforming America’s culture.

    When: begin now and look long-range into the future; a generational campaign.

    Where: in all 130,000 private and public K-12 schools in America.

    Why: because our culture is broken, we must learn to be “good” again and

    eliminate the existing “epidemic of blindness.”

    How: character education led by volunteers with every student, every school, every school day, K-12.

     CONCLUSIONS:

    This campaign can change the nation, from the bottom up, for generations to come. Conversely, it cannot be successful from a top-down program. There are historical precedents in the US military and character-building organizations such as First Tee that prove the validity of the concept.  

    Home Room concept will be successful.  We do not need a trial balloon; we just need to execute. 

    BOTTOM LINE

    The power of the Character Curriculum being discussed with every student in every Home Room every day for 13 years, K-12, results in the following:

    Accountable students do not resort to blame.

    Students who are steeped in commitment, confidence, perseverance, punctuality and responsibilitydo not skip school, fall behind or drop out.

    Students who are deeply rooted in trust and respect will strike down bullying and are unlikely to become racially bigoted adults.  And they will believe the famous words of Martin Luther King, “……they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” 

    Students who are compassionate, courteous, honorable, good citizens and demonstrate the courage of their convictions do not join street gangs.

    Students who have accepted honesty, morality and integrity as their guiding light will likely be life-long upstanding citizens.

    Students who understand, live and accept a life of selfless service are unlikely to become self-serving adults.

    Students who have an understanding that there is a lot they don’t yet know and even part of what they believe they know might be incorrect, have the quality of humility. 

    Students who understand self-respect recognize that they are now better than they used to be and can be counted on in times of temptation because they are morally strong and dependable. 

    With this value base, students across the nation are more likely to exercise good judgment and become great leaders.

    Home Room will make every youngster a better student and a better person. Keeping up becomes important, dropping out becomes unthinkable.

    Any organization that wants to be successful will have underpinnings that includes some or all of the following”

    • Take the long view.
    • Decentralized decision making and execution.
    • Focused accountability at the point of execution.
    • Racial integration that emanates from a value base of trust and respect.
    • A transformational culture of accountability, trust and respect.

    FINAL THOUGHTS

    EDUCATION: What has been done for the past 35 years (hundreds of billions of dollars spent on federal and state programs overseen be thousands of bureaucrats administering thousands of pages of rules, regulations and reporting requirements) has not worked.  Education in the U.S. is a national disgrace.  This can and must be changed. 

    CULTURE:  On 31 August, 2015 black and white protesters marched outside the Minnesota State Fair Grounds.  Their chant, “Black lives matter, pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon.”  At other locations, “What do we want?  Dead Cops; when do we want them? Now.” This is not what America has been about for most of its history, but it is where we are today, part of the “epidemic of blindness.”

    DISSENT:  This is a voluntary program at the local level and there will be some dissent. Teachers’ unions will say there isn’t enough time. Some will argue the volunteers will not be qualified. A few will believe character education is a waste of time.  They will all be proven wrong and when the value added begins to spread across the nation, parents will demand their School Board sign on to the program. 

    The shortest list in this country is a list of youngsters who spent ten years as a Boy/Girl Scout or with First Tee and then dropped out of school.  They didn’t stay in school because they learned to tie a knot, pitch a tent or grip a golf club, they stayed in school and excelled because of the character training that is now part of their being and guides them every day, everywhere, doing everything. 

    Just for a moment imagine as the sun passes over every school house across this country, in sequence 130 million K-12 youngsters in 2 million Home Room classes will put their hand on their heart, look at the Stars and Stripes, recite the Pledge of Allegiance and settle in for a discussion of some elements of the Character Curriculum. Campaign Home Room is within the art of the possible and “we the people”, not we the government, can make it happen and transform America forever.

    “We the people”, those first three important words of the U.S. Constitution, we the people have to start over.   We have to begin with the kids; little kids. And “we the people” have to work it hard for a generation.  If goodness, and hence greatness, is to be regained for this country, it will be accomplished one youngster at a time through character education.

    REALITY IN ACTION. Character education is valid; however, that does not mean all 50 states or all of the county/city boards of education are going to sign up for Campaign Home Room the first year.  Initially, some Governors will see this as a Republican issue, politicize it and decline to participate.  Initially, some Boards of Education will shy away from change out of fear or ignorance, and they will opt out.  Initially, some Principals, because they are incompetent, will make a token effort, fail and declare the concept invalid. 

    But education is an issue near and dear to the hearts of most Americans and conversations among family and friends across county and state lines frequently contain questions like: “how are the kids doing in school?”  “How are the schools in your area?”  “Do the kids have good teachers?”

    These conversations will often be between families whose children are beginning each school day with a dose of character education and those who are not.  Character education has an immediate, definable, positive impact on children; particularly on their school work, attitude, perseverance, attention, courtesy, accountability.

    The “have” parents will begin to use the word, “transformational” when describing their kids’ educational environment. The “have not” parents will begin to ask, “why don’t our schools have character education?”  And when they do begin to ask the hard questions, they will not be addressing some nameless bureaucrat in Washington, they will look to the Principal, the Superintendent, the Education Board members or the Governor they voted for. Social media will move character education through the nation’s conscience like a raging wild fire. 

    The positive changes in student behavior resulting directly from character education will manifest themselves early and profoundly.  Within a couple years after phase three of Campaign Home Room is initiated, the bottom-up pressure will mount and, God willing the whole country will get on board. “In God we trust.”

    WORLD PEACE FOREVER, IS IT POSSIBLE? YES

    While war rages on in the Middle East and Ukraine, the American people have just approved a mandate for change in the U.S.; all kinds of change: immigration, crime, military, the economy, out of control government oversight and regulation, judicial lawfare, foreign affairs, it’s a long list.

    The world is currently speculating about what President Trump will do about the two current combat zones, Ukraine and the Middle East.

    While we are leaning forward as a nation, hopeful, optimistic, open to change and expecting strong leadership, why not add world peace to the to-do list?  But, you ask, is it even possible to look for world peace before the Israeli and Ukraine wars are over?  One approach would be to look beyond the two current conflicts and watch them just dissolve as part of a larger success story on peace.

    The key question is, how can we institutionalize a faster, better, more organized, more aggressive, and all-inclusive plan for preemptive actions that would preclude a Gaza/Lebanon/Yemen or Ukraine from ever happening again?

    A suggestion is to have President Trump, in a major speech on Foreign Affairs to the American people and world leaders, describe in some detail a concept of operations for a new world order that is free from conflict; world peace forever.

    PRESIDENT TRUMP’S PROPOSED ADDRESS TO THE NATION WITHIN A WEEK AFTER ASSUMING OFFICE ON 20 JANUARY 2025.

    President Trump speaking:

    My fellow Americans and our friends abroad who may be listening in. Right now, my staff is busy forwarding copies of these remarks to the leaders of the other 192 countries that are member states of the United Nations and the two countries that are non-member observer states. I want them to see my proposal directly  not after the remarks have been laundered through the media.  

    Seeking the means to achieve world peace is not a new subject; some background is appropriate to set the stage for a way forward. Let’s take a quick look back over the past hundred years at previous endeavors.

    THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS:

    With technically-advanced machine guns, tanks, an aerial view of the battle space and chemical warfare, World War I was optimistically referred to as “The war to end all wars.”  January 1918, U.S. President, Woodrow Wilson, outlined an idea for an organization that would be charged with resolving conflicts before they exploded into bloodshed.  In 1919 the structure of The League of Nations was laid out in Paris and the Treaty of Versailles went into effect in January 1920 with 48 member countries. Our U.S. Congress failed to ratify membership in the League.  Between 1920 and World War II there were numerous opportunities to act, but the organization never did.  The League of Nations was abandoned during World War II.  The League was not necessarily a bad idea, but numerous times, when actions were required, European countries found it too difficult to put together an effective united front against a potential aggressor.

    THE UNITED NATIONS:

    In June 1941 representatives from thirteen nations (the U.S. was not included) met in London and signed the Declaration of St. James’s Palace expressing a vision for postwar world order.  The next step was the Atlantic Conference in August 1941, at which U.S. President Roosevelt and U.K. Prime Minister Winston Churchill laid out a more detailed form of the alliance called The Atlantic Charter. The final step was the Yalta Conference, in February 1945 when Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin agreed on the establishment of the United Nations as well as the structure of the UN’s Security Council.   

    Despite having endured for 79 years, generally speaking, the UN is a weak-intentioned, expensive (2024 internal budget of $3.9 billion) bureaucratic mass that is involved in everything and accomplishes very little.  Case in point, did the UN respond to the Russian invasion of Ukraine 22 February, 2022?  Yes, on March 3rd they voted overwhelmingly for a resolution deploring Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and called for the immediate withdrawal of its forces. That was it, no actions taken.

    The UN is an established international organization perfectly positioned to be a greater force for the greater good of the collective world.  But in its current condition, it is incapable of deterring or bringing to a close a conflict such as exists in Ukraine today. We need to completely rethink this issue right now.  Change is possible.

    THE UN TODAY: 

    The overarching mission of the UN is, I quote, to ensure international peace and security. But they are incapable of doing so and that is primarily because of how the Security Council functions.

    THE SECURITY COUNCIL:

    By way of explanation, the Security Council consists of five permanent members, the U.S., China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom and ten elected UN members.  The presidency of the Council rotates among the fifteen members, each serving for one month.  Is anyone surprised that Russia was president in February 2022 when they attacked Ukraine?

    Under the United Nations Charter, the principal function of the Security Council is also, and I quote, to ensure international peace and security. Additionally, and this is important, the subset authority allows the Council to: 

    One, investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction.

    Two, recommend methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of a settlement.

    Three, formulate plans for the establishment of a system to regulate armaments.

     Four, determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and recommend what action should be taken.

    Five, call on members to apply economic sanctions and other measures not involving the use of force to prevent or stop aggression. 

    And six, take military action against an aggressor. Those six represent a very comprehensive list of positive actions, especially the sixth and final authority to take military action against an aggressor. Unfortunately, none of these routinely happen.  

    The problem is, the Security Council rarely acts decisively because of their decision-making process. All Security Council decisions have to be approved by at least 9 of the 15 members.  The problem is that any one, it just takes one, of the five permanent members, U.S. Russia, China, France or the UK can veto a proposal. One veto by a permanent member and the issue, no matter how important, becomes a dead issue with no action. Reality is that China and Russia can and do routinely prevent the Security Council from acting out, and I quote again, to ensure international peace and security.

     The bottom line is that the UN has never been the answer to world peace and never will be. We need a new and different way forward.

    WHAT IS THE ONE-WORD FORMULA THAT CAN MAKE WORLD PEACE A REALITY?

    That word is deterrence. That is, fear, in the minds of a potential aggressor, of rapid and decisive retaliation by a superior force.

    My intent tonight is to outline a concept of operation that can potentially involve support from most of the 195 nations of the world to join a new organization outside and separate from the United Nations. My proposal is to call the organization, United for World Peace and the military contingent would be called the International Deterrence Force, IDF. This is not to be confused with Israel’s IDF which stands for Israeli Defense Force. The IDF I will now describe to you has absolutely nothing to do with defense. It is all about deterrence based on a very large and capable offensive force. The organization would look like this:

    First, establish two small headquarters, one in the European area and one in Asia.

    Secondly, there will be an elected civilian Secretary General serving one six-year term.

    Third, there will be an experienced 4-star military IDF Commander and an equally qualified 4-star Vice IDF Commander; one stationed in each of the two IDF headquarters.

    Finally, the fully operational International Deterrence Force I will describe to you in a moment that is forward deployed in the member nations.

    The United for World Peace mission statement could be pulled directly from the UN Charter. That is to ensure international peace and security by:

    One, investigating any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction.

    Two, recommending methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of a settlement.

    Three, formulate plans for the establishment of a system to regulate armaments.

    Four, determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and recommend what action should be taken.

    Five, call on IDF members to apply economic sanctions and other measures not involving the use of force to prevent or stop aggression. 

    And, six, most importantly, be ready every day to rapidly deploy a tailored, highly trained offensive IDF elements against an aggressor.

    That’s the framework I am recommending to the United for World Peace organization. At this time let me strongly emphasize that this is not a U.S. organization and the IDF will not be a U.S. force.  Everything will belong to the member nations.

    Given this framework, let me give you my view of the initial internal workings. 

    Importantly, this will not resemble the over 120,000 UN employee operation. In my view the United for World Peace organization will be a lot closer to 12 hundred in size than 120,000.

    My Vice President, J.D. Vance, will select twelve counterpart Vice Presidents from member nations to act as a selection committee.  Member nations will, if they wish, forward the name of a candidate for Secretary General along with a detailed resume. Those will be studied by VP Vance’s Committee and three candidates will be selected to compete in an election, one vote per member nation.  The winner will become the first Secretary General and immediately begin serving a six-year term. 

    A similar action will simultaneously take place to select the IDF Commander and Vice Commander for four-year terms.  

    Every member nation must agree to contribute to the IDF elements from their existing force structure that can be deployed anywhere in the world within seven days.  Every nation will contribute according to its capabilities. Let me give you a sense of how that can work with some examples.

    The U.S. has the greatest capability in the world for worldwide force-projection.  For example, the world watched in awe in 1990 as the U.S. deployed an overwhelming force to the Gulf War in support of a coalition of 38 nations which rapidly defeated the Iraqi forces; more specifics on that later. One U.S. contribution to the IDF could be our entire air-cargo fleet to fly directly to various countries and transport their IDF contributions directly to the targeted area.   Another critical U.S. contribution could be our fleet of about 99 aerial refueling tankers. 

    Countries with few or no actual military resources (only 136 nations have a defense budget) could provide field hospitals, portable field surgical units with doctors and nurses, aircraft maintenance capabilities, truck drivers, border patrol personnel, police, etc. Nations with only small maneuver organizations could provide, for example, man-portable air defense and anti-tank teams and snipers.  There would be a very long list of non-combatant rear-area support requirements. 

    Countries with established air, land and sea combat forces will provide special operations personnel, armored units, light infantry, artillery, helicopters, tactical aircraft, naval vessels, air defense, combat engineers, all the elements for a military theater of operations. Selected nations in several regions would be responsible for providing an airport that can be quickly transformed into a full-up military operation with multiple runways, an expanded tarmac, maintenance facilities, and housing for the military contingent.

    Two of the member nations, preferably among those without an existing military budget, will fully support the two IDF military headquarters’ needs. 

    Imagine a world-wide International Defense Force organization with little or no annual operating budget.  I hope you are getting the impression that this entire concept of operations for continuous world peace can be unique, simple, highly trained, focused, rapidly deployable to anywhere there is a need while also being very austere. By contrast the 2024 UN budget was $3.9 billion.

    One uniting factor is that the United for World Peace organization will borrow NATO’s Article 5 Concept.  That is, an attack on one member is an attack against all members. Let’s pause right here to define what we mean by the word attack. That would be direct or indirect interaction with ground, air or sea systems as well as the use of non-military systems such as cyber-attacks on member nation civilian and/or military targets.

    The first order of business for the IDF military commanders will be to conceptualize what a series of aggressor contingencies might look like. Additionally get current inventories of all the members’ military manpower, organizational structure, weapons systems, etc.  From all that raw data the planners will tailor, on paper, a draft lean-and-mean, full-time, rapidly deployable force that can take down the aggressor nation or organization. That tailored force, in total may come from several member nations and form up in the conflict area of operations. Always overestimate the IDF requirements.  That is, always plan to take a machine gun to a knife fight. Every deploying force should plan to win with overwhelming force and win fast.

    The IDF Commander will establish and publish standards for every contributed element.  Every nation will provide a very detailed quarterly readiness report on the trained-to-standard and deployability status of their IDF contributions.

    The IDF headquarters will maintain a robust intel-processing element linked to the intel gathering capabilities of all member countries. 

    All contributing nations will exist in a state of one of four different IDF Readiness Conditions, IDF-REDCON.

    IDF-REDCON 1:  Normal peacetime condition.  A completed plan will be in place in every member nation.  Readiness standards will be in force for every IDF element.

    IDF-REDCON 2:  The Secretary-General and IDF Commander, having identified a potential threat to a member nation, will tailor a force for deployment and place them on 24-hour alert.

    IDF-REDCON 3:   All personnel and equipment for the designated units will move to assembly areas. Deployment aircraft will move to their first pick-up airfield.

    IDF-REDCON 4:  Deployment of all designated elements to the target area and preparing to initiate an overwhelming counteroffensive.

    SOME OF MY CONCLUSIONS FROM ALL OF THIS DETAIL.

    What does all of this detail come down to?  The answer is deterrence. The objective of having a highly recognizable superior force that can rapidly deploy anywhere at any time can become so overwhelming for potential aggressors to think about that the IDF will never have to deploy and world peace will become the order of every day.  That is the meaning and objective of deterrence.

    My second conclusion is that this IDF concept can annually save trillions of dollars in member nations’ defense spending.  How can that happen? There are currently multiple nations that have the full range of heavy, light and special forces along with the entire array of specialty services such as engineers, signal, intelligence, air defense, artillery, helicopters, air forces, ships and on and on. Under the IDF organization a nation only has to sustain and train the particular forces they are to deliver to the deployable force. For example, one nation may train and deploy only air defense systems.

    SOME POTENTIAL SCENARIOS FOR THE IDF

    An attack on small-country “A” in Africa by a larger neighboring country “B” appears imminent.  The IDF Commander determines that inserting a couple of infantry battalions on the ground could possibly sufficiently deter the attack. But, using the intent to always have an overwhelming advantage, the commander will deploy a full infantry brigade along with combat supporting forces and tactical air support. Result, Country “B” packs up and goes home. Deterrence is a powerful force for world peace. 

    A more serious and far-ranging scenario might look like this:  China continues to threaten Taiwan with aggressive air and naval operations.  It is determined that the demonstrations are a rehearsal for an actual attack.   The Secretary-General and IDF Commander agree to go to IDF-REDCON 3. That is, all personnel and equipment for the designated units will move to assembly areas.  Deployment aircraft will move to their first pick-up airfields. 

    China’s Achilles heel is imported oil, about 11 million barrels per day.  Inform China that an overwhelming IDF naval force is in route to the South China Sea to create an impenetrable blockade of all incoming gas and oil tankers.  Additionally, missiles and aircraft capable of taking out the gas and oil pipelines from Russia will be immediately forward deployed.   The Secretary-General will request China publicly sign a pledge to acknowledge that forevermore Taiwan will be considered an independent nation free of all ties to China and provocative military actions against Taiwan are forbidden. Deterrence in action in support of world peace. 

    During the fall months of 2021, Russia moved a massive army to the Ukraine border giving every indication they would attack which they eventually did on 22 February, 2022.  Had the IDF been in place and an IDF-REDCON 3 announced to the world, there is every reason to believe the Russian invasion would never have taken place.  Again, deterrence in action, keeping the peace.

    The next step could be for the IDF Commander to visit North Korea to discuss ICBM and nuclear testing.  Then on to Iran to discuss Iran’s role as the world’s leading sponsor of terrorist organizations as they routinely finance, train, equip and lead terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah and Sunnis  

    The UN is incapable of deterring any of these example scenarios.

    Why would countries sign up to be an IDF member? Here is a starter list of ten answers as to why a United for World Peace organization is needed now. 

    One, Middle East countries and Israel are fearful of the hegemony intentions of a nuclear-equipped Iran but powerless individually to stop it.

    Two, South Korea and Japan are very nervous about North Korea’s aggressive offensive missile and nuclear programs but powerless to do anything about it.

    Three, Taiwan is fearful of a China invasion. 

    Four, Europe is fearful of more Russian aggression and use of nuclear weapons.

    Five, former Soviet Republics are fearful that they may be next on Putin’s list.

    Six, the Baltic countries and Finland are fearful of Russia.

    Seven, India is in a constant state of unrest over China’s border incursions.

    Eight, African border disputes are a recurring concern. 

    Nine, Iran’s support for terrorist activities threatens the world.

    Ten, aggressors who would use cyberattacks to inflict humanitarian and economic disaster on another nation is a growing threat. 

    During the first one thousand days of the Ukrainian border conflict there have been an estimated 1 to 1.5 million combined dead, wounded, and missing Ukrainian and Russian soldiers and civilians. 

    Another reason to join other nations as a member in the International Deterrence Force is that there will no longer be a reason to belong to other alliances such as NATO or to maintain ready forces in support of bilateral treaties for mutual protection. 

    With world peace assurances in place, the next step could be a world without nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, or biological weapons.

    The UN “peacekeeping force” budget for 2024 was $6.1 billion.  With active worldwide deterrence and an overwhelming rapidly-deployable counter-offensive force trained and ready, peace will be the standard world-wide day-to-day condition.

    With a proactive International Deterrence Force in place, no nation would ever need to feel alone or stand-alone.

    About now more than a few of you are still skeptical about the feasibility of putting together a coalition of nations and then being capable of moving a large combat force possibly thousands of miles into combat. I am here to tell you this proposal is certainly within the art of the possible. Here is why I am convinced and I believe you will be also when you listen to this brief after-action-report.

    OPERATIONS DESERT SHIELD AND DESERT STORM

    Many of you will recall that on 2,3 and 4 August 1990 Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi forces attacked, defeated and occupied their neighbor Kuwait with what Saddam Hussein used to brag was the Mother of all Armies.

    Pay particular attention to this time-line and the size and number of operational elements that deployed from a dead start on 2 August:

    3 August, U.S. President Bush announced that U.S. navy ships had deployed to the Persian Gulf.

    7 August, President Bush began a military operation named Desert Shield which formed a 35-nation coalition to defend Saudi Arabia and ultimately liberate Kuwait.

    7 August, 15,000 U.S. troops, 32 navy destroyers, 100 helicopters and a contingent of fighter planes arrived in Saudi Arabia.

    8 August, the U.S. 18th Airborne Corps began forward deployment to Saudi Aribia, 7,500 miles away.  

    14 September UK and France announce the deployment of troops to Saudi Arabia.

    15 January, 1991, the UN deadline for Iraqi forces to be withdrawn from Kuwait expired.

    17 January, the coalition operation Desert Shield transitioned to Desert Storm with the following results:

    Coalition: 39 countries, of which 28 contributed combat forces.

    Force size: Approximately 670,000 troops from 28 countries, 425,000 of which were from the United States. I’m going to round off the numbers for ease in comprehension.

    Coalition air component size: 2,500 combat aircraft, 1,800 of which were American.

    Coalition airlift: 509,000 passengers and 594,000 tons of cargo carried.

    Coalition sorties flown: 100,000 plus.

    Aerial refueling: 15,400 sorties dispensed 110 million gallons of fuel.

    Number of dumb bombs dropped: 210,000.

    Number of smart bombs dropped: 9,300.

    30mm depleted uranium rounds fired by A-10 manned aircraft (tank-killers): 782,000.

    Duration of air campaign before the ground invasion: 39 days.

    Iraqi tanks lost during the war: 3,700 out of 4,300 oh hand.

    Number of U.S. Carrier Battle Groups on station: 6.

    Coalition POWs taken during the war: 26.

    Iraqi POWs taken during the war: 70,000 plus.

    U.S. combat related deaths: 147

    Iraqi military deaths: 100,000 plus.

    Ground war duration: 100 hours.

    Yes, a highly effective multiple-nation coalition can be organized in days.  The U.S. has done it once and we can show our IDF allies how to do it again.

    FINAL THOUGHTS:

    A final IDF deterrent posture will not be a threat, it will be a promise.  

    There is currently a lot of discussion about the New World Order. Well, here is a new twist on The New World Order, call it World Peace.

    I want to emphasize one more time, this initiative will not be a United States-led organization. It will belong to the member nations.  I do not want to hear the media reporting tomorrow that the United States is trying to become the leader of the world.

    There is no intent with this initiative to do away with the United Nations.  They play an important role in humanitarian relief around the world. But we also must accept the fact that they are powerless when it comes to their mission of ensuring international peace and security.

    A personal note to the leaders of the world’s other 194 nations.  My staff will be contacting your offices beginning tomorrow morning to inquire if you would like to personally discuss this initiative with me in more detail.

    Time is of the essence.  The Middle East could erupt into World War Three at any moment and the Ukraine conflict could escalate into a nuclear war.

    My vision is that if the first 100 of you, the leaders of the world’s nations, can come forward quickly and sign up, at least tentatively, as members of the United for World Peace organization, we could within a few weeks have the 3 members of the Command Group (Secretary General, IDF Commander and Vice Commander) on board with at least a skeleton staff.  Soon thereafter the IDF Commander could be assessing potential member military contributions, airfields, logistics, headquarters locations, etc. and drafting deployment plans.

    The point being that there is potentially so much to be gained and so little risk or expense involved, that it should not be a difficult decision. Try to think about a year from now when some unstable national leader or terrorist organization decides to launch an invasion of all or some portion of your nation.  Immediately, on day one, the score card on the battlefield will be 100 against 1 and the aggressor will ultimately loose decisively and quickly.

    This concept need not be a multi-year plan for activation.  We can make it happen now and insure, as time goes forward, that we gain additional United for World Pease members, improve our capability, agility and deployment times and thereby institutionalize our commitment to world peace forever. 

    Thank you.

    End of President Trump’s presentation on foreign affairs to the world’s leaders and the American people.

    Author: MARVIN L. COVAULT, LT GEN US ARMY retired

    Email: MandDcovault@yahoo.com

    PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SCHEDULE 21 JANUARY, (DEI)

     THEN, 2020: Equal opportunity for all was the goal in a merit driven culture. Military readiness was high, and deterrence was active.

    NOW, 2021-2024:  On 25 June 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order that: “Establishes a government-wide initiative to advance diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in all parts of the Federal workforce”.

     That Executive Order charged, “all agencies with assessing the current state of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility with their workforces, and developing strategic plans to eliminate any barriers to success faced by underserved employees”.

    Biden also ordered agencies to, “seek opportunities to establish or elevate Chief Diversity Officers within their organizations.”

    That order, of course included the Department of Defense.  The DoD is a different type of organization by design and necessity. They take in a cross-section of Americans every day and indoctrinate them into a culture of accountability, trust and respect.  They are trained to kill and blow things up and defeat any and all enemies and do it without losing their moral compass. It’s a tall order and not easy to accomplish.

    It begins the day an American raises his/her hand and takes a solemn oath. From that moment forward they live and breathe in a powerful and pervasive culture that provides every single service member equal opportunity and freedom to not only succeed but to excel as an individual and team member; to be all they can be every day. And the entire organization understands that their individual advancement is based on merit, not some artificial senseless identity-group pronouncement that, it’s-your-turn.”

    DIVERSITY?  President Truman’s Executive Order Integrated the Armed Forces, 26 July 1948. The U.S. military has led the nation over the past 76 years in creating a cohesive organization from a cross-section of all Americans. 

    INCLUSION? The U.S. military has been and is today the master of the culture of acknowledging, embracing, supporting and accepting those of all racial, sexual, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds.  All a soldier needs to know is that those to his right and left have his back. He/she could care less about their heritage.

    EQUITY? Equity is pure poison to the military ethos. All military training is based on standards for every military individual and team task; how to, how many, how fast, how far, how accurate.  Every day some soldier somewhere will perform a task to a new, higher, better, faster standard and thereby set the precedent for all future training of that task. Not everyone can or is expected to meet that new standard but it is there for everyone to see and try.  To have a military built around the concept of equity (“ensure everyone can achieve the same outcome”) serves only to dumb-down the entire organization to the point that it becomes mediocre from top to bottom. 

    That is what has happened to our military since June 2021 and remarkably degraded our capabilities. Why is that important?

    DETERRENCE

    Our strength for decades has provided deterrence. NATO is a great example with consistent combat readiness and strong leadership since 1945.  Soviet Union/Russia has been held inside their borders with the exception of the annexation of Crimea in 2014 under Obama/Biden and most recently the Ukraine invasion which Biden initially described as OK if it is, “a minor incursion.”  Deterrence means our potential enemies believe we can take them on and defeat them; it keeps them at bay. With degraded strength and deterrence today, our enemies no longer fear us, our allies no longer trust us and neither respect the current Commander in Chief. From that our vulnerability, especially over the next two months, is potentially at the highest point in our history.

    WITHOUT DETERRENCE THERE WILL BE SERIOUS NATIONAL VULNERABILITY, FOR EXAMPLE TODAY…..

    THE GRID. One example of our vulnerability is our power grid. It consists of about 55,000 power stations like the ones in your community. If a specified nine of the 55,000, yes just nine, of them were taken down simultaneously by some sophisticated hackers from the China/Russia/Iran/North Korea cabal, the entire country could be without power indefinitely.  An estimated 9 of 10, about 300 million, Americans would die within the first year.

    EMP. A second vulnerability is an electromagnetic pulse.  EMP can emanate from a high-altitude nuclear detonation that does not blow things up or harm people.  What it can do is fry all the electronics over a very large area of the U.S. Or, with simultaneous blasts, can cover the entire country. Every vehicle would immediately stop in place and never move again plus all of our daily electronic items to include the power grid would be nonoperational.  

    A fascinating book published in 2009, One Second After by William Forstchen, describes a post-EPM all-to-realistic environment that would be similar to passing us back in time about 300 years. It is a very scary possibility that we now live with in today’s world.  EMP survival is nearly impossible.  Hello China/Russia/North Korea/and soon-to-be nuclear-capable Iran. Just place some submarines with nuclear-capable missiles off the coasts of the U.S. and in minutes it could all be over for this nation. We are that vulnerable today.

    A few days ago, President Biden reportedly gave permission for Ukraine to use our long-range tactical missiles capable of attacking deep into Russian territory. Putin has already warned Biden that doing so, “would mean NATO and Russia are at war.”  So, there we are.  To make it worse, the missiles, reportedly, will be used against the ten thousand cannon-fodder North Korean soldiers recently deployed to the Ukraine border in support of Russia.

    A note about North Korea and Kim Jong Un.  Kim began a very aggressive program a decade ago to advance his nuclear weapons and intercontinental missile delivery capability.  When he verbally implied he could use them to attack the U.S., President Trump went to Asia three timed to meet personally with Kim.  There is no public record of their private conversations but after the third visit, Kim shut down his entire nuke/missile programs.  Of course, after Biden’s inauguration Kim was full-bore back advancing his nuclear and missile programs while his people starved.  Not a word from the Biden White House.

    Kim is a certifiable nut case who wants to be recognized on the world stage and has joined the China/Russia/Iran cabal with his sophisticated toys of destruction.  It does not take much imagination to conger up a scenario wherein China/Russia would/could, use their lacky Kim to take out our power grid thereby taking the U.S. off the world stage and giving China/Russia/Iran free reign throughout the world.

    Back to President Trump’s meeting on 21 January.

    WHAT SHOULD PRESIDENT TRUMP DO?

    Do first things first.  On 21 January 2025, there should be a classified, not publicly announced, meeting at any location led by the president and attended by all (44) of the 4-star generals and admirals in the U.S. military plus the 3-star Commandants of the Service Academies.

    This is his message directly from the Commander in Chief to every single senior military leader.  He could tell them….

    The Executive Order issued to you from President Biden June, 2021 on the subject of DEI is as of this moment null-and-void. 

    Upon return to your headquarters, you will each issue direct orders to every element in you command that DEI as a subject, as operational guidance is hereby immediately discontinued in its entirety. There will never again be any DEI training, lectures or indoctrination by any one at any time anywhere in your command. 

    Take care of the DEI people. Reassign them to their previous military occupational specialties or provide training for them to be reclassified.  DEI is not their fault; they must not be punished for following the previous Commander in Chief’s directives.

    Today is Tuesday; this will all be completed before the end of this week.  No press release is required or desired.  This is internal business.

    Is there anyone in this room who does not understand my intent or understand exactly what you personally are to accomplish? This task does not get delegated to anyone else, you do it. 

    Are there any questions or comments from anyone on this subject?

    If you cannot do this, you may resign this week. Rebuilding our deterrent strength is too important to our national security to accommodate your personal views or desires on the subject of DEI.

    CONCLUSIONS

    It is possible that every officer attending the meeting on 21 January was nominated by Biden for their current position and therefore have previously convinced the Congressional confirmation hearing committee that they were 100% on board with DEI.

    Based on their previous Congressional testimony, the attendees may have an intellectual conflict going forward. However, I predict that most of the chain of command will comply with the Commander in Chief’s directives. But it will take time, perhaps years, to completely drain the DEI swamp and replace it with a strong, overarching, deeply engrained, operational culture of accountability, trust and respect up and down the entire chain of command.

    BOTTOM LINE

    Our country cannot afford to sacrifice our national security for a half-baked operational culture that cannot successfully function inside any military organization.

    Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of two books, Vision to Execution and Fix the Systems, Transform America as well as the author of a blog, WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.

    THE CONGRESS, FIX IT

    In 2020 when the pandemic was beating up every aspect of our society the Congress concocted a 5,593-page-Bill monstrosity for Covid-19 relief, The Cares Act.  Of course, it passed; nearly everyone could use a little relief from Covid and the taxpayers were stuck with the Bill, all $1.8 trillion dollars.  But here is the pathetic part; under the guise of helping Americans through the pandemic, members of Congress took the opportunity to pork-up the Bill with dozens, if not hundreds, of earmarked funding directives that had absolutely nothing to do with Covid or Covid relief.  Here is a sampling:

    $10 million for “gender programs” in Pakistan,

    $300 million for fisheries,

    $100 million for NASA,

    $300 million to Endowment for the Arts,

    $300 million to Endowment for the Humanities,

    $300 million to Public Broadcasting,

    $500 million for Museums and Libraries, 

    $720 million to Social Security Administration,

    $315 million to the State Department,

    $90 million to the Peace Corp,

    $492 million to National Railroad Passenger Corp,

    $526 million grant to Amtrak. 

    $4.7 Billion in foreign aid to nine countries.

    The takeaway from this example is that under different circumstances, each of these expenditures could have/should have seen the light of day in one or more congressional committees where expert witnesses would have testified to the pros and cons of passing the funding.

    The second takeaway is that the Covid Relief Act was not a one-off occurrence. Producing multi-thousand-page Bills has become the norm. No one who votes for them has actually read them and therefore do not know what they are voting for or against. Should we be borrowing money for earmarks that have never been exposed to public scrutiny? If viewed separately by the American taxpayers, would they all pass the smell test?  Absolutely not.

    For years politicians have been emphasizing the need for infrastructure spending.  So, in 2021 Congress finally passed, in a bipartisan vote, a $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Bill which, by the way, is also funding universal pre-K, child care, enhanced child tax credit, earned income tax credit, Affordable Care Act subsidies, Medicaid expansion, medical hearing benefits, affordable housing, Pell grants, children’s nutrition, immigration, state and local tax deductions, etc. etc. etc.  Only about 25% of the expenditures actually exist for real infrastructure such as roads, bridges and airports. What happened to the remaining $900 Billion?

    We just finished a fiscal year with $1.8 trillion in deficit spending, up from $1.7 trillion in 2023.

    Those opening paragraphs are just attention getters.  Now to reality.  It has become obvious in the first week after the election that President-elect Trump is serious about cutting needless spending.  My all-time favorite, “$10 million for gender programs in Pakistan.”

    In a great attention-getting move President Trump has selected a couple of very smart patriots, who have themselves built huge, successful, lean, efficient organizations, to downsize government and cut needless expenditures of many Billions of dollars; namely Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.  I am at this point a little unsure if they are just going to concentrate on the Executive Branch or will they also look into the Congress.

    This Musk/Ramaswamy endeavor is a great start for the following reasons.

    A mammoth, sprawling, uncontrollable, federal government currently numbering about 4.3 million plus hundreds of thousands of contract employees was never the vision or intent of the Founding Fathers.  Organizations have a propensity to grow to a point of diminishing returns; cease to be efficient, effective, and/or no longer perform the functions for which they were created.  At that point, a large organization will tend to look inward and become self-perpetuating rather than value-added for the greater good.

    Their downsizing and reorientation of the Executive Branch will undoubtedly cut hundreds of Billion in unnecessary spending.  But there is a second arena that when turned inside-out and looked at through a microscope can potentially save additional hundreds of Billions of dollars annually. That is the Congress, coming up next.

    UP-FRONT WORK

    First President Trump should do a couple things.  One is to call in the Congressional leaders and tell them he has no intention of signing into law any passed Bill that is thousands of pages long.  I will not sign Bills that you have passed but not yet read. Additionally, I will not sign a Bill in which all of the expenditures have not been analyzed in relevant Congressional Committees and voted out of committee before going to the Floor for a vote.”

    This would be the beginning of a complete overhaul of the concept of operations for the Congress.

    Additionally, the entire project of reorientation, reorganization and spending cutting in the Executive and Legislative Branches should be the overall purview of Vice President Vance. He should be the Spending-Cut Czar as his immediate and number one priority project as Vice President for at least the first year.  This would be an important delegation by the President.  It would be the best possible training ground for the VP. It would set him up for a successful run for the presidency in 2028. Finally, as effective as the Musk/Ramaswamy team might be, the downside is that they are not in the chain of command. A reluctant Department leader could nod his/her head yes every day and then just blow them off and continue with business as usual.  The VP is in their chain of command and can make sure those under review clearly understand who is in charge. 

    What follows is a suggested concept of operations for the Congress which currently is a lethargic, undisciplined, ill-guided failure as an operating organization that routinely wastes hundreds of Billions of taxpayer dollars every year thereby creating annual deficit spending and additions to the unsustainable national debt which is currently approaching $36 trillion.

    THE NEW CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR CONGRESS

    Begin by institutionalizing a set of seven new operational standards and then establish a small oversight organization that will make sure the standards are in place and utilized every day in every way.  An organization without standards is a failed organization.  

    THE CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDRDS AUTHORITY, CLSA

    This small agency will be formed under the Inspector General (free from Congressional influence) inside the General Services Administration (an independent government organization). The CLSA’s sole purpose will be to enforce these seven standards and to administer the life-cycle of a piece of legislation. The CLSA will NOT be in charge of the Congress.  They will NOT make policy.  But they will become the administrators of the day-to-day process of creating new legislation and a new budget.  The Congress has proven that it is incapable of successfully and efficiently administrating themselves.  The CLSA can become something akin to the very valuable oversight we see from the Congressional Budget Office whose work is objective, impartial and nonpartisan. 

    Under the CLSA every Bill will first appear on a Congressional web site operated solely by the CLSA that is totally dedicated to enforcing the standards for every Bill.  Every member of Congress will receive an alert each time a new Bill is proposed and posted on a congressional new-legislation website. 

    This website will be managed solely by the CLSA; The sponsors of a Bill may contact the CLSA at any time to update schedules, to notify members of committee hearings, to make changes to the legislation, etc.  But the CLSA employees are the only ones who can access the site to add, delete or change any piece of information.

    The CLSA does not have the authority to recommend changes, additions or deletions to the intent of the legislation.  Their function is to determine if the proposed legislation meets certain established standards, with particular emphasis on Standard Number Three, Applicability. 

    STANDARD NUMBER ONE, OUTLAW “EARMARKING”

    An earmark is a provision inserted into a discretionary spending Billthat directs funds to a specific recipient while circumventing the merit-based or competitive funds allocation process. Most earmarks are attached to a “must-pass” Bill so that it is protected from non-passage or presidential veto. My definition of an earmark is an idea that would not have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting passed if, standing alone, it was exposed to the light of day.

    STANDARD NUMBER TWO, SUNSET LEGISLATION

    This is a measure, within a statute or regulation, that provides that the law shall cease to have effect after a specific future date, unless further legislative action is taken to extend the law. Most laws do not have sunset clauses and therefore remain in force indefinitely. Keep in mind that most laws cause some new Executive Department organization to be created.  Our government is full of agencies, divisions and branches that require annual funding, while having outlived their requirement to exit.

    STANDARD NUMBER THREE, APPLICABILITY

     In the 2020, a 5593-page Covid-19 relief Bill there were scores of organizations funded from that Bill that had absolutely zero association with the Covid-19 outbreak or relief thereof.

    Hereafter all of the provisions of a particular Bill must clearly identify with the subject, purpose and intent of the Bill which could save hundreds of Billions of needless expenditures per year.  It will prevent publishing Bills that are too lengthy to read; e.g., not a single Representative or Senator actually read the 5593-page Covid-19 relief Bill before they voted on it.

    STANDARD NUMBER FOUR, STAND-ALONE

    Every Bill will be a single-issue piece of legislation. Period.

    STANDARD NUMBER FIVE, TIME LIMITS

    There are two different situations to consider.  One is the federal budget process and the other is all Bills other than those in the budget process. 

    The non-budget Bills will get processed in one continuous timeframe not to exceed 90-days per Bill.  The CLSA will grade the scheduling of all activities to insure it is ready to be voted on within the 90-day timeframe.  The exception to this is, at any time the Bill’s sponsor or committee may pull it from consideration. (We will get to the federal budget process in a few minutes.)

    STANDARD NUMBER SIX, LEADERS CANNOT HIDE A PENDING BILL

    The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader in the Senate too often practice sitting on Bills, not allowing them to be voted on for protracted periods of time. This will not be allowed.  Every Bill will be voted on or before the end of its 90-day window.

    STANDARD NUMBER SEVEN, STANDARD WEBSITE FORMAT

    Every piece of legislation will be formatted with four specific sections and pages as follows:

    SECTION ONE OF THE CLSA STANDARD FORMAT IS ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY AND WILL LOOK LIKE THIS:

    CONGREESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDARDS AUTHORITY

    Page 1, Administrative data

    Current as of: ____ (date ____(All of the below data will be filled in as it becomes available from Congress.  For each new or changed data point, this “current as of” date will also be updated.)

    Title of the legislation:  ___   ($10 million for “gender programs” in Pakistan)_________

    Date which starts the 90-day calendar: (the date the CLSA initially uploads it onto the website and notifies all legislators that it is there for them to act on)

    Not-later-than-date to be presented, debated and voted on the floor of the House of Representatives or Senate___(90 days after the above “start” date)_____

    The member of Congress who is the principal sponsor: ______________________

    co-sponsors: _______________________

                                                    _______________________

                                                    _______________________

    Author of the proposed Bill: ______________ (a member of Congress, the White House, a Congressional committee staff, Executive Branch Department, Non-governmental organization, lobbyist, private citizen, etc.)

    Sunset legislation date:  ___(a date that must be included inside the Bill)_______

    Schedule for committee hearings: ___(determined by congressional leaders)____

                ____(Foreign Affairs Committee)______

                ____(___etc.______Committee)______

    COMMENTS ON DRAFTING OF LEGISLATION:  

    Lobbyists. There are nearly 12,000 registered lobbyists in the U.S.  They work for businesses, professional associations, cities, states, non-profit organizations, etc.  They get paid to make things happen in government and mostly that is in the form of special interest legislation. Lobbyist are a prime source of today’s legislation and earmarks. It is not a completely negative concept but the downside is that they can too frequently get politicians to earmark appropriations that are self-serving and not in the best interest of the general public. 

    Congressional committee staffers.  Staffers write much of the legislation today and therein lies a big problem.  Because many issues rarely fit nicely inside the domain of a single committee, there will ultimately be multiple committee staffers, working on behalf of their politicians and bringing their individual thoughts and prejudices to the effort. Too often, having begun in good faith to build a thoroughbred race horse, they end up with a herd of camels. Under today’s system that “camel” ends up earmarked to some “must pass” Bill and eventually in some Executive Branch, department or agency for execution. By then, the original intent for the Bill may be so convoluted that it is potentially a complete waste of time, energy, money and is one of the causes of the gross inefficiency of government. 

    The Executive Branch of government, to include the president, should author a larger portion of the Bills.  Why?  Because they know the who, what, when, where, why and how details of their proposals that should not be delegated to lobbyists or congressional staffers. Why not let the experts, those who will be responsible for execution, do the up-front piece?  For example, if the Department of Homeland Security needs $400 million for border security, they should write the proposed Bill and seek out some member(s) of Congress to sponsor it.

    SECTION 2 OF THE STANDARD WEBSITE FORMAT WILL LOOK LIKE THIS:

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDARDS AUTHORITY

    Page 2, Legislation Intent

    Current as of: ____(date inserted by CLSA)_____

    (CLSA Instructions:  This narrative must be limited to one single-spaced page, font 12 and must begin with the words, THE PURPOSE OF THIS LEGISLATION IS TO…….

    Intent is one of the least used and most important aspects of any law.  Congress and the authors of a Bill should not leave it to the applicable governmental departments to infuse their own intent for what the laws should or should not be about and thereby create unintended consequences.

    SECTION 3 OF THE STANDARD WEBSITE FORMAT WILL LOOK LIKE THIS:

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDARDS AUTHORITY

    Page 3, Component outline

    Current as of: ____(date inserted by CLSA)_____

                (CLSA instructions: provide an outline of the major elements.  The format

    will be similar to a Table of Contents but with a few sentences explaining each entry.

    SECTION 4 OF THE STANDARD WEBSITE FORMAT WILL LOOK LIKE THIS:

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDARDS AUTHORITY

    The Entire Bill, (e.g.HR-12 or S-16}

    Current as of: ____(date inserted by CLSA)_____

    (The entire Bill should be carefully crafted and consist of a very limited number of pages that can be easily understood by the general public.)

    SIX CONCLUSIONS about having Congressional Legislation Standards Authority oversight of day-to-day stand-alone legislation.    

    One, “$10 million for gender programs in Pakistan.” After the fact; that’s when we found out about this and dozens more ridiculous “Covid-19 relief” packages.  Who knew about them before they became law?  None of us.  Why?  Because the Congress can waste our tax dollars almost at will while hiding behind a wall of anonymity. What happened to accountability?  Without standards there is no accountability.

    Two, under the above proposed CLSA program, we would have known on day-one who sponsored this insane earmark.  We would have known when a committee was going to discuss it.  We would have known weeks in advance when it was going to be voted on.  We would have known all this because it would have been a stand-alone Bill, not hidden inside a 5593-page unread Bill.  Accountability and transparency would have been front and center. The fact is, it would never have made it to the floor for a vote because visibility by the press and by we-the-people would have caused it to go away. 

    Furthermore, one of the great advantages of a standards-based legislative process is that in all likelihood, the Bill would never have been written because anonymity is non-existent.

    Three, journalists will use the CLSA website as a source for up-to-the-minute reporting on pending legislation.  Citizens can read it, learn what the legislation is all about, understand the positives and negatives of the intent and weigh in with their elected legislators before, not after, it becomes the law of the land.

    Four, after about a year, this simple process will guide all new-legislation activities in the Congress and will be accepted as the new normal.  This process has the potential to save hundreds of Billions of dollars per year.  It will have the effect of spending our tax dollars first in support of we-the-people.

    Five, additionally, and perhaps most importantly, this more disciplined approach to legislation could have the long-term impact of moving toward greater fiscal responsibility building towards a future balanced budget mindset.  

    Six, successful, admired organizations operate this way every day. It is as simple as one-two-three.  One, thoroughly define a single TASK at hand.  Two, define the CONDITIONS, in this case stand-alone Bills. Three, set and enforce the operating STANDARDS without exceptions.  Task, conditions, standards; this new approach to doing the peoples’ business in Washington is within the art of the possible and it will not cost a dime to adopt and institutionalize operational change.  But it will take strong leadership to put it in place and make it happen.

    THE FEDERAL BUDGET PROCESS STANDARDS:

    As previously stated above in STANDARD NUMBER FIVE, TIME LIMITS, there are two different situations to consider; the non-budget related Bill with sections 1-4 defined above, and now a look at the federal budget process legislation.  

    THE FEDERAL BUDGET PROCESS LEGISLATION: To develop and pass a new budget with twelve separate appropriations Bills is supposed to be a standardized eight-month process from early February through the end of the fiscal year on 30 September. 

    THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH RESPONSIBILITIES:  Each October federal agencies begin compiling their budgets for the following fiscal year and submit their proposals to the President via the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  OMB edits, calculates, and coordinates the budget for final review and approval by the President.  The President then forwards the approved proposal to the House and Senate, hopefully, by the first Monday in February.  

    CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ACTIONS: The Budget Act of 1974 lays out the required congressional actions, February through September of each year, in order to have a completed, agreed upon and signed budget by 30 September. Upon receipt of the president’s budget, various Committees begin reviewing their respective sections of the budget; the process is spear-headed by the Budget Committee.

    BUDGET RESOLUTION:  Upon receipt of the President’s Budget, the Budget Resolution document is then worked in the House and Senate. The budget resolution process allows Congress to establish a framework within which the House and Senate will consider budget-related legislation and set revenue and spending levels. The Budget Act set a target date of 15 April for adoption of a budget resolution by both chambers. The CLSA will closely monitor the resolution process looking for violations of the standards on earmarking and applicability.

    BUDGET RECONCILIATION

     The Budget Act further sets a target date of 15 June for completing action on reconciliation legislation if required in able to complete the resolution. Without resolution between the House and Senate there are no rules, no timelines, no standards and no discipline.  All of that leads directly to the chaos and disasters of completing a budget for all twelve separate appropriations Bills by 30 September.

    Following budget resolution and reconciliation, April through June, the 90-day CLSA standard window begins for passage of the twelve budget appropriations. 

    The Budget Act of 1974 lays out the timelines for Congress in the passage of an annual budget by 30 September each year.  So, how are they doing?

    According to the Pew Research Center, “Congress has passed continuing resolutions to keep government agencies running between budgets in all but four of the last 40 years. The last time Congress completed all Bills on time was in 1996.”

    Congress has only adopted a budget resolution prior to the April 15 target date on four occasions since fiscal year 1985, with the most recent being fiscal year 2004.

    Because Congress usually doesn’t pass its 12 appropriations Bills on time, it then uses continuing resolutions and omnibus Bills, which cover several appropriations. The consequences are a less effective, more expensive government that wastes taxpayer dollars and burdens current and future generations with massive debt.

    The 12th and final appropriations Bill for FY 2024 was finally passed 23 March 2024; six months late.

    Before adjourning for the summer recess last August, Congress had passed only one of the 12 appropriations Bills for FY 2025. By the time they all got back to work, they had only 11 days to pass the remaining 11 appropriations.  It didn’t happen. September, 2024 the House and Senate approved a stopgap measure to keep the government funded for three months. Therefore, they are currently facing a funding crisis next month in December.

    One of the most basic Constitutional tasks for Congress is to pass a fiscal year budget and do it on time.  However, Congressional indiscipline continues to place the day-to-day functioning of the federal government in jeopardy and thereby negatively affecting nearly all Americans in some way.

    This is unacceptable institutionalized irresponsibility and ineptitude.  The system is seriously broken because of the failure of the senior leaders, House Speaker, Senate Majority Leader and Committee Chairpersons.

    STANDARDS FOR THE ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS, FEBRUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER.

    STANDARD NUMBER ONE:  Leaders publish detailed plans, well in advance, for action with hard suspense dates for accomplishing all assigned tasks. That includes all Committee chairpersons.  If they can’t get their act together, replace them immediately.

    STANDARD NUMBER TWO:  Leader’s schedule and take frequent IPRs, In-progress reviews.  If committee work is behind schedule, the senior leaders will direct night and weekend work to ensure on-time results

    STANDARD NUMBER THREE:  Runing out of time is not a valid excuse.  Work hard, work long, work weekends if necessary but get it done.

    STANDARD NUMBER FOUR:  Election year schedule. When 435 Representatives and 1/3 of the Senators are home campaigning every other year, that needs to be taken into consideration and not become a valid excuse for not accomplishing any of the budget tasks on time.   

    the Congressional Legislation Standards Authority needs to come into play again as follows beginning with these website pages:

    CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION STANDARDS AUTHORITY, CLSA and THE ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS

    The Speaker of the House, the Majority Leader in the Senate and House and Senate Budget Committee chairpersons will be required to prepare and publish a Concept of Operations for the next fiscal year budget preparation process published on the CLSA website not later than 15 January.  Their narratives will cover the who/what/when/where/why and how of the process in great detail. 

    (The CLSA will, prior to putting the above proposals on the web site, reconcile any conflicts in dates or products.) 

    CONCLUSIONS

    We the people should not stand for the irresponsible, wasteful consistent conduct of our elected leaders and members of Congress.

    Given the overall irresponsibility and potential waste of Billions of dollars in the current approach to the annual budget process, does it make more sense to produce a biannual budget that will be required on 30 September of every non-election year?

    BOTTOM LINE:

    President-elect Trump is working hard to cause the swamp to be drained and for the Executive Branch to become more efficient and less costly. He should take advantage of this popular initiative and press hard for the Speaker of the House and Leader of the Senate to immediately demand an update to the Budget Reform Act, 1974 to give it some teeth and demand Congressional actions that will cause the entire budget process to be completed on time every time.

    TWO NOTES TO SUBSCRIBERS

    One, parts of this concept of operations was first published about three years ago but it fell on deaf ears of the Biden/Harris administration. Much has changed and is changing just since the 5 November election. If you know the president or his staff or advisors, please make them aware of this potential initiative that could cut hundreds of Billions in spending. 

    Two, with President-elect’s attitude towards change and improvement there are a number of concepts of operations that could potentially interest him.  They are all contained in a book entitled, Fix the Systems, Transform America.  the subjects include:

    Our Education System

    Race Relations

    Illegal Immigration

    Voter Fraud

    Federal Deficit Spending Cuts by,

                Reducing Size and Scope of the Executive Brance

                Fixing Congress

    Term Limits

    Universal Service for Young Adults

    Achieve World Peace Forever

    I’m not trying to sell books; I want to help fix America and now could be the time for several or all of these topics to take flight. As a minimum, the concept for operations is included to fix each one and could be a start point for a team to begin thinking through these problems as opposed to beginning with just a blank piece of paper.

    PS: During the presidential campaign Harris was constantly advocating, “a new way forward” because it was a catchy phrase, not because she actually could articulate one.  While not naming “it,” her new way forward that she did articulate was more taxes, more spending, bigger government with more regulations. President-elect Trump, on the other hand, and without using the phrase, is in fact actively working on a new way forward that will positively impact all Americans…..smaller government, fewer bureaucrats, balanced spending, secure borders, economic growth, strength through real deterrence, law abiding communities, deported criminals, and hopefully some of the issues named above.  Need your help expanding the president-elect’s horizon with some suggested problems/solutions in the book.  

    Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of two books, Vision to Execution and Fix the Systems, Transform America as well as the author of a blog, WeThePeopleSpeaking.com

    CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

    Thankfully the 2024 election cycle is over and the presidential race is not being decided in the courts. But being over does not mean there aren’t things to do. In fact, it is the perfect time to fix some things while they are fresh in our minds. Campaign finance reform should be one of them.

    According to Forbes, the 2024 election will go down as the most expensive in U.S. history, with a projected $15.9billion in spending across all federal races; presidential, the House and the Senate.   

    At the center of it all is a record-setting presidential race. Kamala Harris’ campaign committee and outside PACs raised $1.6 billion, compared to Trump’s $1.1 billion. While the final numbers are not all in, their combined $2.7 billion already beats the $2 billion raised for Trump and Biden in 2020 and dwarfs the $1.2 billion raised in 2016 for Trump and Clinton.

    Among other big doners, Harris was backed by Michael Bloomberg and Bill Gates who each contributed $50 million in support of her campaign. Trump received nearly a quarter of a billion dollars from just two backers, Timonthy Mellon and Elon Musk, who pumped millions into pro-Trump PACs.

    But the 2024 campaign is not unique.  Going back to 2020, Forbes analyzed the top 20 contributors and found they spent a total of $2.3 billion in contributions.

    What are they spending the money on? According to AdImpact, the total bill for ad spending in the 2024 election hit almost $11 billion, a new record and $2 billion more than in 2020. You remember the almost continuous flow of campaign ads that we got so sick of watching we almost wore out the mute button on our TV remotes.

    That whole campaign finance gig just has a really bad smell. It’s influence buying on steroids. The whole contribution concept of operations does not represent the general public, it has become a contest within a contest to see which candidate can sell their soul to the highest bidding billionaires. Shame on us.

    THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION is supposed to be in charge of all this.

    “The FEC is an independent agency of the United States government that enforces the Federal Election Campaign Act, 1971 which covers U.S. campaign finance laws and oversees U.S. federal elections. It is led by six commissioners who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.”  First question, if FEC members are nominated by the serving president how, if they are all of one party, do they function as an “independent agency” without some bias?

    The commission describes its duties as, “to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections.”

    Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, in place for 2023 and 2024, an individual can donate to more than one candidate (for president, House and Senate) in both the primary and general elections.  The limit is $3,300 to each candidate in each election.

    How then did billionaire Michael Bloomberg get $50 million into the Harris campaign? The short answer is through a PAC.

    POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES, PAC

    A PAC is typically organized for the purpose of raising money to either elect or defeat a political candidate or ballot issue. 

    Every PAC is required to register with the Federal Elections Committee within ten days of its formation. 

    There are three main types of PACS.

    One, Separate Segregated Funds, SSF, is a PAC organized by a corporation, labor union, membership organization or trade association. This kind of PAC can solicit money only from those connected with the association that sponsors it. 

    Two, a Nonconnected PAC is independent of the above organizations, and therefore permitted to solicit donations from the public.

    Three, Super PACs may solicit and accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labor organizations and other PACs.  They may not accept contributions from foreign nationals, federal contractors, national banks or federally chartered corporations. Super PACS can use their contributions to bankroll independent expenditures and political activity. 

    WHY PACs?

    PACs are not an essential part of our important election process. We can do without them.

    There is certainly a downside to the overall election process that contains a provision for, “unlimited contributions.”

    What do we lose if we just rely on contributions from individual U.S. voter-eligible citizens?  Nothing important.  There will certainly be less TV advertising.  

     CHANGE THE LAW

    Campaign financing for all federal candidates (president, House, Senate) should consist of one, and only one, source and that source is the voter who is geographically associated with the candidate.  for example, any legally registered voter may donate to a presidential candidate; any registered voter in a state may contribute to their U.S. senatorial candidates; and any registered voter in a congressional district may contribute to their House of Representative contest. 

    During the 2023-2024 two-year election cycle the limit for contributions by individuals to federal candidates for President, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives was increased to $3,300 per election per candidate.  That is, $3,300 to a candidate for President, the House and Senate for a total of $9,900 for the primary election and $9,900 for the general election. Anyone found to have contributed more than these limits will be guilty of a federal offence and subject to a fine and/or imprisonment.

    HOW TO POLICE THE CONTRIBUTION SYSTEM

    Concurrently, every federal candidate must scrupulously and continuously account for every campaign expenditure. For every national election, the federal election commission could have temporary auditors operating in all 435 congressional districts and they will have open access to every candidate’s campaign finance records.  The FEC auditors, operating in each congressional district, will also audit senatorial and presidential campaigns. FEC auditors will, throughout the campaign, audit candidates’ books with the objective of aligning contributions and expenditures. 

    Candidates are to file periodic reports that disclose the total amount of all the campaign contributions they receive, along with the identity, address and occupation of any donor who contributes more than $200 during the campaign period.

    How can the FEC accountants, in each of the 435 Districts, monitor individual contribution input from the voters and identify the voters who are exceeding the contribution limits and thereby identify the candidates who are accepting those too-large contributions? One way is to identify every contribution with the voters’ Voter ID number.  I know, Voter ID is not yet a reality but it is the solution to many other potentially fraudulent actions throughout the election cycle.  

    If Voter ID can become a reality, the auditors will immediately know that the contributor is a citizen and an eligible voter. With contributions sorted by Voter ID numbers they can immediately know if the total contributions have exceeded the legal limit to any one candidate during the primary/general election cycles.

    During each calendar year of a national election, the FEC could create some number of panels consisting of five retired federal judges for each panel.  All accounting irregularities will be immediately referred to a FEC panel of judges. If the panel finds conclusive evidence of gross campaign finance irregularities, the candidate could be subject to being disqualified by the FEC. That regulation alone, will encourage accurate and legal reporting into the election system.  

    CONCLUSIONS

    The election process should lead us to the best qualified person being elected, as opposed to ending up with the best fund raiser.

    The Federal Election Commission cannot provide effective oversight when forced to deal with an “unlimited contributions” provision leading to multi-billion-dollar campaigns.

    Super PACs are for the most part uncontrolled.  Analysis of the use of Super PAC contributions reveals that it is primarily used for negative campaigning. “The role that super PACs often play is to do the dirty work for a campaign,” said Chris Karpowitz, co-director of the Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy at Brigham Young University. When name-calling and character assassination become the dominant message, the American people tune out and probably gain a healthy disrespect for both candidates.

    BOTTOM LINE

    There is little goodness in multi-billion-dollar political campaigning.  It’s not hard to fix it so it should become one of President Trump’s 100-day initiatives while it is all fresh in our minds.

    Marvin L. Covault, Lt Gen US Army, retired, is the author of two books, Vision to Execution and Fix the Systems, Transform America as well as the author of a blog, WeThePeopleSpeaking.com.